Aristotelian ethics Essays

Virtue ethics, primarily founded by Aristotle, was the dominant approach in Western moral philosophy until Enlightenment [1].Its importance re-emerged with the dissatisfaction associated with deontology and utilitarianism, two theories unable to address issues such as moral character, moral education, friendship etc. Virtue ethics emphasize moral character and virtues, focusing on three central concepts: virtue, practical wisdom and eudaimonia. Cultural Relativism is the view that holds that moral

In Book II of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotelian virtue is described as a purposeful disposition that lies in a middle and is motivated by the correct reason. Virtue is a steadfast attitude. It has a purposeful disposition as well. A moral person makes a conscious decision to act morally for their own sake. According to Aristotle, the most significant virtue is prudential knowledge. Soldiers in battle must act prudently by basing their decisions on experience. Because bravery necessitates making

Aristotelian and Utilitarianism Ethics on Abortion Abortion, for a long period of time, has been debated upon focusing on either the law or essentially on politics. Perhaps then, the debate has been based on outlawing abortion through treating the act like a murder of a fellow human being or either defining the act as an individual’s legal right. Whether the choice should be accorded to the individuals or the law, abortion constitutes fundamental ethical issues which over the time have not been given

Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics by risking his own life to realign the inner workings of the Enterprise to save his crew. This is true because he is trying to act virtuous and he wants to do the right thing. Captain Kirk dying, he tells Spock that he knows he would have done the same thing. This shows that Spock is a virtuous character and Kirk wants to be the same, so he does the morally right thing by fixing the ship, despite the radiation poisoning that comes. Spock exemplifies Kantian Ethics when he cannot

one would call happy…” (Ethics 938). It is not enough to state that one is virtuous, nor is it enough for someone to be born virtuous and end there. Rather, it is the continuous pursuit, the juxtaposition of virtuous activity and of that which isn’t, that allows an individual to flourish in an Aristotelian society. We can deduce, then, that “…human

In order to understand leadership ethics, we need to understand the difference between a leader and a manager, the difference between a good and a bad leader, and to know how to analyze the relationship between good and evil, duty and obligation, right and wrong, justice and fairness and also to understand the relationship with all humans and nature. Ciulla in her article “The state of leadership ethics and the work that lies before us” stated that the main characteristics that need to be analyzed

important issue to one of the Care Ethic, because the relationship that one has with the rest of the creatures, human or otherwise, leads them to protect one another. At its core, Amazon’s social responsibility is centered on care. They care for their communities, and they care for the world. They want their customers and shareholders to believe this. They do this because they have a responsibility to the people that they serve. It is very much in line with the Care Ethics principles, and it is entirely

Happiness is an unending topic of discussion in philosophy. This paper explores the similarities and differences in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism to coin a position in whether or not happiness is the ultimate end that human society aspires to acquire. In a critique of both the works, the paper adopts the Aristotelian thought citing that actions of human aims to fulfill goodness, which arguably is the happiness, one that arises from virtues practiced out of

would have to be virtue ethics. Famous philosophers like Aristotle and Aquinas, spoke highly of virtue ethics and each developed their own theories on the topic. Although Both of these philosophers wrote about virtue ethics, their approach was quite different. So, what is virtue ethics? According to Lewis Vaughn, “a moral theory that focuses on the development of virtuous character”(Vaughn 808). Although both Aquinas and Aristotle had different approaches to virtue ethics, there was a consensus on

correct moral ideal, the spectrum varies from person to person. Two very important people, in understanding moral value were Aristotle and Immanuel Kant. Kant has a person of moral worth whereas Aristotle believes the moral ideal is someone of Aristotelian virtue. I believe Aristotle’s ideal person of virtue is the correct morally ideal person, in comparison to Kant. I will be elaborating more on the person of Moral Worth and Virtue throughout this essay, while comparing and contrasting the two elements

constructed in opposition to what truly exists. Idealism can be believed as a way to deal with philosophy in which the fact of the matter is accepted to be rationally developed contrary to what genuinely exists. 2 From the Greek word for essence (ousia), Aristotelian form is that which is in matter and makes a thing what it is. According to Aristotle, form makes a substance what it is. This kind of substance making form is

Additionally, there is utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics of which people can choose to base their own moral compass. However, for some, their moral compass is not immediately visible, such as Tony Stark. It is especially difficult for Tony Stark because he does not fit any of the criteria for the three major schools of philosophy, in fact he is “Aristotelian because [he] joins the person with the deeds” (112). Others, such as Batman, clearly have a moral

Aristotle: The Father of Modern Ethics Undoubtedly, the most prevalent author in the philosophical world throughout all of human history, Aristotle’s work has remained of the highest regard for some 2300 years. His historical resume includes many major developments in myriad fields that continue to be studied today, including astronomy, politics, zoology, logic and most notably, philosophy. Although he studied all of these topics, Aristotle stated that it was philosophy that was his true passion

John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, Immanuel Kant’s Deontology, and Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics all provide unique perspectives in answering moral dilemmas. In a specific instance, deciding whether or not succumbing to Body Identity Integrity Disorder is ethical, each aforementioned philosopher would use certain justifications from their respective theories to come to a conclusion. Kantian Deontology provides the best, most wholesome explanation in this case. Body Identity Integrity Disorder (BIID)

Different cultures build different grounding experiences, because experiences are not understood without interpretation. As they experience things, people interpret them. One cannot be objective while interpreting any given, since social and cultural features influence any interpretation. There exist no “innocent eye” in any experience. If experience of normal situations cannot be separated from interpretation, neither can experience from virtue. There can be no uninterpreted, universal, pure grounding

He drew attention to notions on mythology, mathematics, architecture, and moral ethics. He highlighted certain features of the persons in his paintings because he wanted the audience to know who was who. In, The School of Athens, he placed the philosophers in specific places to emphasize the distinction between their philosophies. He

Anita Okoye Worldview and Ethics Dr.Kyle Martins 10/26/15 We are talking about the eight questions, comparing Sire and Hiebert worldviews, and how it is telling us the meaning in what Sire and Hiebert are looking for. The primary beliefs and the presuppositions at heart of the modern worldview, (it is helpful to start with the Sire’s 8 questions from pp 22-23 of the Universe Next Door, though you may depart from these if something you want to say doesn’t fit neat into Sire’s list). According

encouragement. Community was also mentioned as a key factor, people who work for corporate must think as if they are a member of two communities, one which is for themselves and then the public. 2. In what sense does Solomon think the Aristotelian approach to business ethics better than the Kantian approach? The Kantian approach lacks emotion. These would be compassion, sympathy and even happiness. The Kantian approach focuses on duties rather than on

Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is a compilation of books, or scrolls, designed to be an all-encompassing work on ethical goals, and how they may be achieved. In the work, Aristotle lays out a position uncommon in ethics, which doesn’t directly take into account the moral standing or concern of others, but places emphasis on one’s own happiness, a position akin to egoism. This position is defended by Aristotle in his stating that happiness is the primary goal in life in the same way that victory is

Aristotle first discussed ethics, virtue, and their relationship to happiness around 340 BC. in The Nicomachean Ethics (trans. 1953). This work, later known as Aristotelian ethics identifies the struggle to come to terms with living a good life. These are questions that have been pursued through the ages and in this essay, I will be investigating the theory behind the identification of my own signature strengths and corresponding virtues as proposed by Seligman and Peterson (2004), touching on