Within this essay I will be anylyzing the Crito in Plato’s five dialogues. In this portion of the book, Socrates has been confined in a prison due to his misfortunate trail, where he was unjustly accused of corrupting the youth, and failing to acknowledge the gods that the city acknowledges. Here he waits for his execution, and contemplates escaping prison to save his own life with Crito. Crito, who is a dear friend and follower of Socrates teachings, attempts to sway Socrates away from his decision
Philosophy Thesis: In Crito, Socrates justifies the idea of the social contract to Crito, his strongest advice being that one should not return injustice to anyone, despite their outgoing treatments on others or on yourself, however, Socrates is hypocritical in saying that one should live freely and rightly so, but he himself chooses to die because it is just. We are introduced into the story by the disputive dialogue between Socrates and Crito regarding Socrates' escape and the opportunity for himself
Socrates’ Arguments in the Crito In The Crito, Socrates argues that he should not escape prison because it would be morally incorrect. He says that the really important thing is not to live but to live well. Therefore, by escaping prison, not only will he suffer the consequences but also his family, his friends, and the city of Athens. Socrates argues that the city of Athens would be affected if he escapes from prison. By escaping from prison, he would be breaking the laws of the city. Since the
provoked to either, retaliate or escape the oppression. In Plato’s Crito, Socrates is condemned to death because of his occupation and must defend his obligations to remain in Athens to Crito. Socrates dismisses the fact that he has been judged unjustly by the Athenian democracy and rejects Crito’s proposal to help him flee Athens. By defending his decision on principles of rational-based ethics, Socrates attempts to persuade Crito that, neither his nor the consent of their friends, justify the plans
Jason Iloulian Professor Farley First Paper Oct 26-2015 Is Socratesʼ position consistent between The Euthyphro and The Crito? Does he display the same attitude towards authority in each dialogue? The Crito is a story that Plato tells that involves the last days of Socrates while the Euthyphro involves the story that relates to Socrates trial and defense; before his ultimate judgment and death. Each story contains many consistencies. For example, his demeanor in the face of near certain death seems
Crito arrives early in the morning to help Socrates to escape into exile. However, Socrates has already accepted his pending death, and a sophisticated argument between the two occurs. To reduce bias, Socrates says that if both he and Crito come to an agreement that escaping is just, then he will proceed with it. Crito claims that Socrates’ death will harm his reputation to which Socrates replies that the thoughts of the majority are not as pertinent as the thoughts of the wise, for the wise knows
The Story of Crito by Plato is essentially a dialogue conversation between Crito and Socrates. Socrates is awaiting execution at the hands of the state. Crito has an elaborate plan in place to free Socrates from execution. Crito has paid the prison guard off so that Socrates can escape and has other loyalist to Socrates ready to help him escape and live his life in exile. Socrates is nearly 70 years old at the time and somewhat feels like his life is essentially already over. Crito tells Socrates
Socrates is sent to jail to await his execution. Crito arrives before Socrates is scheduled for execution and offers him a chance to escape. Crito believes the jury's decision was unjust. In Crito's eyes, Socrates is innocent and therefore has the right to escape. However, even though Crito believes Socrates has the right to escape, Socrates disagrees with him. He reminds Crito “no human being should do injustice in return, whatever he suffers from others”(Crito, 49c). Socrates argues even if the jury's
The Crito is Plato’s account of the conversation that took place between Socrates and his wealthy friend Crito in a prison cell while he awaited execution. Crito is amazed by how serene and peaceful his friend Socrates is sleeping (Plato, Tredennick, & Tarrant, 2003, p79). At the same time, Crito is sleepless and depressed, and it would be not hard to think that Socrates should be the person in that state. Crito is desperately attempting to convince Socrates that his execution would mean not only
In Crito by Plato, Socrates argues that he should remain in prison because escaping would go against living a just and honorable life. If Socrates escapes prison, he will harm the city; this means that Socrates will not be just and honorable. However, Socrates’ argument includes that breaking the law is not just and honorable. I will argue that Socrates should have escaped prison since his argument to remain in prison failed to consider that some laws should be broken because they are unfair. Crito
Topic 3 : Does Socrates, in the Crito, reject civil disobedience? If yes, show where. If no, explain what he does reject. Crito tries to persuade Socrates to flee Athens to escape from the death penalty in the Crito. Instead of acquiescing into Crito’s persuasion, Socrates makes several arguments against leaving the city, namely because Socrates believes that one should never disobey the law. The belief that a state is the ultimate superior and disobedience destroys a state does make Socrates a
Plato’s: “Obedience to the State” is a passage that takes place after Socrates has been condemned to death by the jury of Athens. Crito, a student of Socrates appears outside of his cell and makes one last attempt to persuade Socrates to flee Athens and save his life. Crito makes many valid points in trying to convince Socrates to escape, but Socrates feels he should accept the decisions that has been made regardless of the lethal ramifications. The following paragraphs will analyze Crito’s arguments
In Crito, Plato portrays Crito as Athens’ common man. Though wealthier and more educated than most, Crito’s intellect is used as a tool to exemplify how Socrates’ dedication to the polis differs from the majority of Athens’ population. Socrates maintains that “not living, but living well is to be regarded as most important” and therefore escaping from prison is not an option because it would be violating this principle (48b4-5). Socrates justifies this to Crito by refuting his arguments for escape
be of their own interest or the betterment of the other. Shortly before his execution by the Athenian senate, Socrates was approached by lifelong friend Crito who urged him to escape into exile than suffer execution. Plato transcribed the dialogue between the two men; Socrates describing his lifelong duty to uphold the social contract and Crito stressing the importance of morality above all else. Despite history recording Socrates staying and executed, his reasons for doing so, despite Crito’s urging
In the Crito, Socrates and his long-time friend Crito discuss the complex question of whether or not Socrates should escape from jail due to his impending execution. Their argument questions whether citizens should always follow the law. They originally have different opinions and reasoning, but Crito eventually comes to agree with Socrates. Both Socrates and Crito express many valid points on the subject. Crito comes early in the morning to visit Socrates early in the morning and bribes the warden
The main theme of the book of Crito is about whether should Socrates break the law and escape from execution or stay and accept his death penalty. At the very end, Socrates pointed out that trying to escape breaks the law, and any act that breaks the law is unjust . Therefore, Socrates refused to escape and decided to accept his death penalty and execution. Socrates responded each of the three arguments Crito brought out. However, are Socrates’ arguments reasonable and is it always right to obey
The setting of Plato’s dialogue is Socrates having been found guilty and imprisoned thirty days before his execution. His friend, Crito visits him and expresses the purpose of his visit to Socrates. Crito persuades him to escape from prison and go avoiding his sentence of death. The difficulty Plato faces in composing this dialogue is to justify Socrates' decision to stay in prison rather than try to escape after his wrongful condemnation. Plato lists a few ideas from Socrates’ education that
In the text “Crito”, Socrates converses to Crito his beliefs about one’s Obedience to Authority. Socrates is incarcerated “for having corrupted the youth and not believing in Athenian Gods” and is “sentenced to death by drinking hemlock” (Zwolinski 109). Since Socrates has a day or two until he must be put to death, Crito believes that he should try to escape his death as soon as possible. Socrates does not believe that it would be right for him to escape because “this is an attempt to destroy the
Socrates was sentenced to death. Crito, a friend of Socrates comes to him while he is awaiting his punishment. Crito tries to convince Socrates to escape to another city, but Socrates chooses to stay and face his punishment in Athens after taking a look at the reasons to escape and the reasons to stay. Philosophical and personal issues were also contemplated by Socrates while making his decision. Socrates allows Crito to make his arguments, then Socrates makes his; after Crito fails to convince Socrates
The Philosophical Meaning behind Crito In the Apology (29c-e) Socrates’ says he would decline to comply with the Athenian court on the off chance that they were to absolve him on the condition that he stop philosophizing. In the Crito, then again, Socrates over and over demands complete compliance to the city of Athens and its laws. It is a true disagreement for Socrates to decline to escape from jail in the Crito and subsequently enthusiastically submit himself to execution, while in the Apology