Throughout all of history, people have tried to convince those around them of a certain idea. The only way these people could get others to listen or to follow them is by speaking or writing persuasively. In order to thoroughly convince them, the speaker/writer would have to proficiently use the technique of rhetorical devices. Political leaders especially use particular word choice and sentence structure to ensure the target audience believes every word they’re hearing so the leader can play into their emotions by using the rhetorical device pathos, they’re moral values by using ethos, and they’re logical thinking by using logos. Specifically, Adolf Hitler was one of the most influential leaders and speakers in history due to his masterful
Reinhold Niebuhr 's quote does put things in perspective, we are a small snapshot in a much larger picture, we need to do our best with hope, faith and love to steer the ship in the proper direction. The quote also ties into Palmer 's idea that we shouldn’t be judging ours with effectiveness as the ultimate measure. It’s a little hard not to see the irony in the statement of not using effectiveness as our measure, especially after just finishing a business course which put emphasis on such measures. However, Niebuhr 's quote really does resonate the importance of our internal values versus our external success.
With all of the books written about President Lincoln, one might believe that there is nothing more to learn about this great man. However, Doris Kearns Goodwin wanted to show an unconventional analysis of Mr. Lincoln and how he used politics to his advantage. Three well educated men with similar backgrounds were compared alongside Abraham Lincoln who was considered to be much less educated and unqualified for the position. This trio of officials was astounded when Lincoln won the election. Over time and years of working together, the four of them had become friends and respected each other.
He then asserts that Trump successfully utilized oratorical tactics to manipulate the unconscious mental frames of voters for political support. He categorizes Trump’s oratorical tactics into repetition and “metaphorical thought”. Trump combined their usage to develop a person which subconsciously connects to voters by altering the way voters perceive his character. Using Trump, Lakoff effectively highlights the power and danger associated with “metaphorical thought” in political rhetoric. Nonetheless, he fails to account for Trump’s use of emotional appeal (pathos) embedded in his rhetoric, as a means of persuasion.
I chose The Autobiography by Benjamin Franklin. I am very familiar with it because I did a project on it, so I will be able to explain it in greater detail than if I had chosen another story. It was quite enjoyable and informative, too, so I find it interesting to discuss. The Autobiography is about Franklin’s journey to become a better person. He originally wanted to become perfect, but he was never able to achieve this goal.
Frankenstein Rhetorical Analysis Essay An abandoned life from society and that doesn’t follow normal activities could make you a romantic hero. In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, she portrays the main character, Victor, as a man that is intent of learning more about nature. Victor begins to make mistakes which causes him to be full of sorrow and exiled from society. Victor begins to possess some traits from Byronic list of traits that romantic heroes possess.
Upon receiving your letter, I have had mixed emotions: both enthrallment and fear. These feelings have led me to my final decision, paired with my conscience and ethical judgement. As a consequential moralist, of course I had to contemplate the consequences of each action and decide which one would be best for myself and the Jewish people. On a deeper reflection, I regret to inform you that I have decided to reject your request of aiding you in the assassination of the Führer.
Elie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech Analysis Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and winner of a Nobel peace prize, stood up on April 12, 1999 at the White House to give his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. In Wiesel’s speech he was addressing to the nation, the audience only consisted of President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, congress, and other officials. The speech he gave was an eye-opener to the world in his perspective. Wiesel uses a variety of rhetorical strategies and devices to bring lots of emotion and to educate the indifference people have towards the holocaust. “You fight it.
Hitler’s use of pathos and ethos made him seem very emotional towards the topic. His use of pathos by using hand gestures to express more emotion while he talked as well as letting tension rise by making people wait made his speech more effective. He used ethos when he talked he would start in a lower voice and get higher while he made it sound like was really looking out for the German people. He wanted to gain their trust. When he would say sentences such as “The delusion that some are the conquerors and others the conquered destroys the trust between nations and thereby also destroys the world economy.
In President Bush’s address to the nation, he uses many rhetorical devices. A rhetorical device is a literary device that is used to persuade the audience to support the argument made. Bush’s address uses Ethos, Logos, and Pathos. They were invented and studied by the famous greek philosopher Aristotle. Ethos appeals to credibility, Logos appeals to logic or reason, and Pathos appeals to the audience’s feelings.
In President Roosevelt’s speech, there are multiple rhetorical devices that can get a point across. Using these rhetorical devices, the audience may be able to become swayed by the main message being expressed. The goal of a speech is to catch the audience’s attention greatly and persuade them to gain similar beliefs on whatever is being spoken of. In Roosevelt’s speech, the mood expresses a ray of hope yet a feel of strictness. One rhetorical device used by Roosevelt is personification.
Furthermore past leaders have used rhetoric in their quest for power. Rhetoric is defined as “The art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing”(Oxford dictionary). Orators and compelling leaders use rhetoric to influence their audience. Marc Antony in “The tragedy of Julius Caesar” uses rhetoric beautifully to sway the Romans from Brutus’s side to his. “You all did see that on the Lupercal.
Award winning writer, George Orwell, in his dystopian novel, 1984, Winston and O’Brien debate the nature of reality. Winston and O’Brien’s purpose is to persuade each other to believe their own beliefs of truth and reality. They adopt an aggressive tone in order to convey their beliefs about what is real is true. In George Orwell’s 1984, Winston and O’Brien use a variety of different rhetorical strategies and appeals such as parallel structure, pathos, and logos in order to persuade each other about the validity of memories and doublethink; however, each character’s argument contains flaw in logic. Winston debates with O’Brien that truth and reality are individual and connected to our memories.
This proves that Hitler’s use of pathos alone causes the stadium of people to be persuaded. Moreover, Hitler uses ethos to build his credibility as a leader of the Nazi Party. Hitler does this by standing upon a podium, making him seem more important and with more power than if he were to stand on an eye-level with the audience. Furthermore, Hitler has the Nazi sign behind him, causing the German people to think about joining the Nazi Party due to the repetition of symbols present. Also, Hitler is wearing a uniform that is militaristic.
President Eisenhower, in his address to the country, more specifically the people of Arkansas, discusses the inevitable situation involving racial segregation occurring in Arkansas. Eisenhower’s purpose is to convey to the country that he will fight to preserve the decision that the Supreme Court came to on racial segregation. He adopts a personal tone in order to convey to the people of Arkansas that he understands how they feel in this situation. After establishing that he will do whatever is necessary to protect the rights of the students and connects with the Arkansas people by addressing the fact that his decision wasn’t based on his personal beliefs, Eisenhower shifts his focus to validating the citizen’s feelings of anger and feeling slighted. Eisenhower through logically crafted arguments asserts that he will use his powers to ensure the students’ rights aren’t withheld.
SCENE REVEALS TO A MASSIVE FORM OF DIGNIFIED SOLDIERS IN UNIFORMS LINING UP. WE SEE ALL THE SS AND NAZI PEOPLE SITTING NEXT TO THE SPEECH TABLE. FROM THE STADIUM ENTRANCE, A MAN IN DEFINITE POWERFUL ENERGY WALKS UP. GERMAN LEADER, ADOLF HITLER, IN FULL OF TENSION. A COMPLETE SILENCE REMAINS FOR A MOMENT UNTIL: ADOLF HITLER (I.G) (Raises up his eyes, salutes) SA & SS, Heil! SOLDIERS