Rhetorical Analysis

Gretchen states, that while Hitler was fighting for power, he found ideas that he needed already in place. He lent his authority to the racist ideology, and the scientists gave him their prestige and their

People in Germany wanted to impress Hitler by pursuing in the propaganda being done. "Most Nazi propaganda was intended to build up the image of Nazi leader Adolf Hitler..." ("Propaganda and Wars"). How Hitler thought about the Jewish people was that they were evil and couldn 't be trusted at all. Hitler also believed that the Jews were considered an enemy of Germany. Therefore, wanting to belittle them so they would get out of the country ("Propaganda and Wars").

George Washington declared that “Common Sense” drove the war into their favor, and thus quoted, “I find Common Sense is working a powerful change in the minds of men” (Bigelow 102- 103). However, some people viewed it as a defector when Paine allegedly declared that King George III as a “Royal brute of Great Britain” (“Common Sense”). Furthermore, Paine also emphasized a powerful attack on the British monarchy, thus demanded a strong federal Union to strengthen the Patriots morale ("Thomas Paine Biography”). Paine emphasized his attack through the use of words, some people might view the Paine as a person who would hide behind his pen and write. However in fact, Paine exemplifies characteristics of that a soldier.

In this case, Ojeda’s counter argument should have been more expanded and increased with such powerful words. For example, when Ojeda highlights, “He didn’t like being denied,” she could have proclaimed that “Hitler does not appreciate the act of disapproval and he dislike being excluded.” The quote that she proceeded by Max Rothman, should have been more detailed and aggrandized. Also, she did not have a concluding sentence on her counter argument. Whereas her third paragraph and her conclusion did not have any concluding sentences as well. Overall, Ojeda did a very decent job on proving that Hitler’s environment led him to become a dictator in Gernmany.

Despite Jackson’s best interests for the common people, his actions did have dire economic consequences. However, his actions proved that Jackson was truly the common man’s president and supported the majority

Transportation meant more interactions of people and information, but often had devastating effects due to the human folly of wanting to decrease time. Women in the work force increased the production rate, as well as a boom in the economy, but were often treated in inhumane conditions and regarded lowly. Banks allowed vast opportunities for the wealthy investors, but also ended up disabling the poor working force, especially in the depression. As such, while there were evident benefits to the market revolution that heavily boosted the economy and development of the country, the drawbacks still outweighed the positives. Death and people taking advantages of others led to the market revolution being a dark time in American history.

Propaganda, terror and repression played a significant role in the Nazi regime. Hitler used each to supplement and complement each other with the main focus to make Hitler appear a strong, powerful and all-knowing man who was in favour of the Nazi vision of the ‘national community’. This all impacted the German people by preserving support for Nazism and ensuring that the community that didn 't agree with the Nazi regime would not be heard by any

Which brings me to the next Enlightenment philosopher Voltaire. Voltaire had a very big impact on society as he encouraged people to start having their own ideas. In Voltaire 's time period people were constantly punished for not agreeing with the church or the government. Voltaire believed that society would be much better off if there was freedom to have your own ideas. Voltaire believed that diversity was the key to success for society as he stated in The Philosophical Dictionary, "To be a good patriot is to wish that one 's city may be enriched by trade, and be powerful by arms"(Voltaire).

In a way, Antony does follow these guidelines but sarcastically. Antony manipulates his own words to create a sarcastic speech so that the common folk are able to comprehend that Caesar’s death was unnecessary. Antony had said, “Caesar was ambitious: If it were so, it was a grievous fault, And grievously hath Caesar answer'd it.Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest--For Brutus is an honourable man;” (III,ii). Manipulation is not limited to fictional Roman

Then towards the end of the story, repetition is utilized to make the Plebeians want to interrogate Brutus about his loyalty as he utters," Yet Brutus says he was ambitious: and Brutus is an honorable man... And sure he is an honorable man." Next, in Brutus speech the rhetorical devices that exist are logos, rhetorical question, and pathos. These devices were used to illustrate how ambitious Caesar was and how hungry he was to hold the crown. As an example, logos is used to send a message out to the judges to take a step back to look at the big picture when Brutus announces, "Censor in your wisdom, and awake your sense that you may the better judge. "(Shakespeare 17-18) After that, a rhetorical question was addressed to manifest why he eliminated Caesar to free everyone from being serfs which questioned,"Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar was dead, to live all free