Analysis Of Into The Wild, By Jon Krakauer

583 Words3 Pages

Written by Jon Krakauer, Into the Wild (1996) is non-fiction story that addresses the matters of how to be recognized by humanity and how searching for one’s identity occasionally clashes with being an existent citizen in the society. Chris McCandless left to discover some kind of illumination. Also, he tried to discover his way into the woodlands with very little physical belongings because of the belief that it can make the flight more gratifying. His life-threatening adventure was the hubris that ultimately caused his demise. Chris McCandless trusted that daily existence was a strain and assumed that everybody must go out and explore the world’s true beauty.
Jon Krakauer constructed an illuminating prism by which he reconvened the unsettling truths of McCandless’ life. Acknowledging a …show more content…

Yes, the book was striking but McCandless still vanished from the records of reminiscence, into challenging Alaska. It seemed like it he dreamt of vanishing. He saw abandoned bus and made it a dwelling. He tried hunting but he was not really fruitful. He depended on land-living, but the land was not compassionate. Two of the more straightforward statements in contemporary culture are that we all need help from other people, and that we should occasionally rely on the kindheartedness of strangers. If we are not aware of these two,we might eventually end up in an abandoned bus too. According to Krakauer (2013), “From a cryptic diary found among his possessions, it appeared that McCandless had been dead for nineteen days...The probable cause of death, according to the coroner’s report, was starvation... I speculated that he had inadvertently poisoned himself by eating seeds from a plant commonly called wild potato, known to botanists as Hedysarum alpinum... it became impossible for him to hike out to the highway or hunt effectively, leading to

Open Document