The Analysis- Nowadays, the internet becomes an indispensable tool in our world, especially in politics and business world. There is the common phenomenon always happen in our life. Most people prefer to communicate on the phone rather than communicate with peers face to face. People also prefer read electronic books and news rather than read it in the papers. Therefore, the internet becomes a controversy point today. Most people are arguing whether the internet is harmful to human’s life or not. The most representative article of this controversy topic was Nicholas Carr - < Is Google Making Us Stupid?> in 2008. In this article, Carr stated that the internet has begun to change our ways in many aspects. For example, the Internet has begun …show more content…
The first part is to use anecdotes to support his argument. The second part is to use the psychological experiments to present how Internet use affects cognition. In the anecdotes of Carr’s article, he not only used the pathos, but also used the logos-based rhetoric elements. Carr provided the anecdotes for two to three pages. When I read these anecdotes, I really feel like our thinking ways are controlled by the Internet. When I read “Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy…The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle” (Carr 57) these sentences, it really touched my heart. It is rarely people will have their own critical thinking after reading an article, most people just chose skim to read …show more content…
In the article, a small list of the years provided: 1882, 1976, and 1936. If Carr can provide some examples happened anywhere near the creation of the internet, it will be more supportive of his article. The weakness of Carr’s article is that lack of some modern evidence to support his arguments, otherwise, he really makes his argument consistent well and presents well under rhetorical strategies. The most importance thing I learn from Carr’s article is how to use rhetorical strategies well to support your arguments. At the end, Carr also shows an example of an opinion that is in a very minute minority, still manages to hold a persuasive
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
He attempts to show us in his essay how our minds have changed due to the use of the Internet. Summary Nicholas Carr examines in an essay how digital technology affects our intelligence. Nicholas was educated at Dartmouth and Harvard and is a member of Encyclopedia Britannica’s editorial board of advisors. He has written a book name “The Big Switch: Rewiring the World from
Carr describes the way our brains have changed as a consequence of using media. He later reports that when new or improved technology enters our lives, we begin to take on the qualities of those technologies, because it changes our “intellectual technologies”. He also uses the analogy of a clock, presenting the idea that we eat, work, sleep, and rise based on what time of day it is, instead of listening to our own senses. Carr then uses the claim from a 1936 British mathematician named Alan Turing that computing systems are subsuming most of our other intellectual technologies such as our map and our clock, our printing press and our typewriter, our calculator and our telephone, and our radio and our television. Likewise, he explains how the internet assumes what we are thinking and injects its context with hyperlinks, blinking ads, headlines, and other propaganda.
As previously mentioned, Carr likely wants his audience to critically think about the internet; persuasion that the internet might bring about intellectual tragedy comes second to that. Personally, a lot of his examples of ethos are effective only if the “authorities” mentioned were familiar names. For example, the bloggers were people I have never heard of, and thus, their testimonies are the same value to me as the testimonies of someone who posts on Twitter. However, in gauging whether he succeeded in getting me to think about the internet more, Carr definitely succeeded. All in all then, Carr’s article was one that wants to critically challenge thought by revealing the points of view from both side and letting the readers make their own
Starting his article, Carr’s use of personal stories and experiences further his point. He talks about the issues he’s had with concentrating on long readings since technology has become more prevalent in
Is the internet changing our ability to focus? Or more importantly, is the internet harming our ability to focus or enhancing it? Based on my interpretation of Nicholas Carr’s essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, I believe he thinks it is making us worse. Although he did bring up a few valid points, his opinion is flawed due to the many benefits of the internet as well as a few assumptions he’s made of the effects it’s had on the human population. Nicholas Carr’s essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, brings towards us the argument that the Internet is changing the way think and do day to day activities.
Is Google Making Us Stupid? The article "Is Google Making Us Stupid"? By Nicholas Carr depicts that the internet has become the most approved sources for modern research and studies as it contains all the information which might be needed. Carr uses ethos, logos and pathos to show his audience how the internet has changed our lives.
Carr’s article describes his newfound struggle to focus his attention and immerse himself in longer pieces of literature (92). Carr also indicates that many of his colleagues are struggling
In his article, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?", Nicholas Carr contends that the consumption of information through the Internet has made people dim-witted due to poor concentration and comprehension. Carr starts his article by specifying the scene of Dave disassembling HAL in Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, Carr builds up himself as a dependable storyteller by showing himself as an abstract master who knows about well-known culture and can associate famous media to his contentions. To the reader, this makes Carr seem less disconnected from his general audience when he continues to discuss the negative effect of the Internet on interpretation and focus on the remains of the article. Carr seems more like a well-versed expert who altogether
In the last twenty to thirty years, a vast surge of technological innovation has swept over the world. The internet is a giant collection of databases stored all over the world, allowing anyone with a computer and internet access to view virtually their heart desires. Today the internet has blown up into a juggernaut of political activism, business schemes, and freelance writing. In his 2008 article entitled, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published writer Nicholas Carr goes to the depths of the current global debate regarding beliefs that the internet has changed the way humans think.
He observes from his own experience of how deep reading that once came naturally is becoming a struggle. His claim may be persuasive and touching to some, but his use of experience is not enough evidence that the Internet has changed our minds. Even though it comes from people that spent their lives around writing and reviewing books, it is not a reasonable claim to believe the human society is not as intellectual and that we are more so skimming thought material only because technology has advanced throughout the years. Carr should revise his argument and get scientific or psychological proof that states that the Internet is “changing our minds.” If the article was better structured it might have been more convincing.
“The Internet is the first thing that humanity has built that humanity doesn't understand, the largest experiment in anarchy that we have ever had” This mystery of the internet will always stay unsolved, but in my opinion, I think that this mystical internet delivers a bad impact on one’s life in many prospects but it benefits us as well. In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Carr tries to explain his point that the internet is playing a very crucial role in one’s life and the virtual life is taking its toll on society compared to the reality. Carr’s theory of google making us stupid is extremely useful because it sheds insight on the consequences which are a result of excessive use of the internet. The internet has directly influenced
The Influence of Technology In the essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr argues that utilization of the internet has an adverse effect on our way of thinking and functioning in everyday life. Whether it be reading a newspaper, or scrolling through Facebook, internet media has forever stamped its name in our existence. Carr explains to us that the internet is a tool used every single day in today’s society, but also makes most of us complacent with the ease of having the world at our fingertips.
Nowadays, the internet is the biggest marketing and media tool that people can use today. It can have various effects on people’s daily life ranging from bad to beneficial. In the essay “Is Google making us stupid” by Nicholas Carr writes about how internet usage in the 21st century is changing people’s reading habit and a cognitive concentration. Particularly, he emphasizes on Google’s role in this matter and its consequences on making people machine like. Carr also stated that the online reading largely contributes to people’s way of reading a book.
Nicholas Carr's argument against the internet was very strong, and it persuaded me. It is very difficult for me to go against his opinion. I agree that the internet is changing us, but not in ways we think. There are long-term effects of using the internet as often as we do. He states that the internet is changing the way our brains function such as having a shorter attention span, negatively changing the way we critically think, and negatively changing our reading skills.