Analysis Of Steven Shapin's The Scientific Revolution

898 Words4 Pages
In Steven Shapin’s book, The Scientific Revolution, he described the massive scientific changes that occurred from the late 16th to the early 18th centuries. Shapin utilizes the scientists and their findings to demonstrate the changes that affected Western civilization. He describes his theory of the Scientific Revolution as he proves that the world has always had scientific advances. Steven Shapin states his thesis which influenced the modern world, that the Scientific Revolution did not happen during a single time period through the use of the three essential questions: What was known, How was it known, and What was the Knowledge for. Shapin’s thesis is thought to be illustrated through the first line in the book, “There was no such thing as the Scientific Revolution, and this is a book about it” (1). Steven Shapin expounds on this throughout the book as he portrays the many scientific findings during this time but states that it is not a revolution. He believes that there is not one revolutionary change that would allow this time to be considered the Scientific Revolution. There were scientific findings before the 16th century and there were more to follow the 18th century. Shapin’s thesis covers that there was no specific scientific distinction between the 17th century and the rest of time for this period to stand out and be a revolution but he explains that the Scientific Revolution is more of a process. Shapin still believes that the scientific findings of this time

More about Analysis Of Steven Shapin's The Scientific Revolution

Open Document