Anger is an innate feature and feeling that is present in all human beings. It is a feeling the leads man to feel that he is not restricted and free. It gives one the motivation to face everything and create his own predestination ( Grasso1).Vincent K. Bissonette believes that anger is a respond to the injury and unfairness that the mind receives towards something (126). Aristotle declares that anger is a motivation that accompanied by pain. It leads to the idea of trying to make the other suffer throw taking revenge from him without any reason (20). Carol Tavris asserts that anger, from an evolutionary view, is an essential and fundamental response to existence (46). It is also the last step that one reaches to after frustration and annoyance. It is a very negative emotion that leads one to destroy the society he lives in or reform it (17). After the second World War, a lot of people felt angry due to the oppression and unfairness that were exercised against the working class by the indifferent rulers. The second World War resulted in the unemployment of a lot of people as a result of the economic crisis that happened due to the …show more content…
Those angry young men were various British novelists and playwrights who emerged in the 1950s. They expressed "scorn and dissatisfaction with the established sociopolitical order of their country" (Merz and Brown 18). The political, social and economical conditions of their society had affected their writings. They were expressing the hypocrisy of the upper class society (Esslin 15). Those angry young men were of the working class or lower middle-class origin. Their plays reflected their anger towards the inferiority and injustice of their society. These writers left all what was belonging to the pre-war society. They innovated new contents and forms. They reflected the feelings of their country which were ' more defeated than victorious" (Nicoll
Young people in the 1960’s would have responded in shock because of the realism of the play. This play is still relevant today since it can relate to any person. Due to the fact, that war will always be
World War I, known as the war to end all wars at the time, had massive impacts on the U.S. Soldiers that were being sent off into the battlefield not knowing whether they would return home dead or alive. Soldiers fought, slept, and lived in trenches for the entirety of the war. Although, soldiers were not the only ones experiencing poor conditions during the war Citizens, and even countries, were affected by the war in various ways. Citizens in the U.S were stripped of their right of freedom of speech under the first amendment. WWI caused a large epidemic in the U.S regarding health safety.
Anger is a memory never forgotten. You only tame it”.
When someone is angry they’re not really themselves and any of their actions or words may be done in a fit of rage. This unpredictable aspect of anger could hurt someone else unintentionally resulting in
Economy. According to the Oxford Dictionary, it is “The state of a country or region in terms of the production and consumption of the goods and services and the supply of money.” World War Ⅱ was a devastating time for everyone in the early 1900's. Pain and loss was a common occurrence, and people were struggling. This war affected multiple countries and colonies around the world, socially, politically, and economically.
Anger is a common disease possessed by many humans. How people deal with anger is what makes them different. Some, the second they are confronted, act out violently. Some hold it in until they cannot possibly take anymore, then explode. Some, let other people act out for them.
Riots and fights, strikes and curses, have been the effect of unhappy
Anger is an emotion in which an individual becomes fulfilled with hatred and energy that has a larger impact than guiltiness. The strong emotion of anger can cause an individual to react to different situations in different ways. For instance, in To Kill a Mockingbird, Jem shows anger and hatred when he loses his temper to when Mrs. Dubose insults Atticus. He destroys her camellia bushes with a baton. Jem’s rage is displayed when Scout describes his actions, “Jem snatched my baton and ran flailing wildly up into the steps into Mrs. Dubose’s front yard, forgetting everything Atticus had said, forgetting she packed a pistol under her shawls, forgetting that if Mrs. Dubose missed, her girl Jesse probably wouldn’t.
Twelve Angry Men “A person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.” In the play, Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a nineteen years old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence were presented, the three that are weak include the one of a kind knife, the old men who heard the words “I’m going to kill you!” and the woman who is in question because of her glasses. Based on these, the boy is not guilty.
Oscar Wilde wrote his plays against the backdrop of the Victorian English society. It therefore helps to discuss the salient aspects of the Victorian society. Victorian England is known for many paradoxes -- glaring contrasts between the rich and the poor, insistence on morality on the one hand and the practice of cynicism on the other, blooming creativity pitted against blatant constriction, imperial grandeur since Britain was then ruling almost one fifth of the total surface of the earth and domestic squalor since the majority of people did not have decent means of livelihood, and finally collectivity dictated by tradition opposed to the rapidly developing individualism. The class system denied the talented members of the lower classes access to social and economic advancement. The upper classes alone had the privilege of working in the government, the armed forces, and the church, while trade was monopolized by the rising middle class.
In the movie “12 Angry Men”, various Ways of Knowing are identified by the TOK course such as emotions, perception and reason. The film demonstrates the role that emotion plays in the aim of knowledge, if we can truly trust our sense to perceive what the world really is, and is arguing through reasoning significant? Emotion plays a role in the search for the truth whether it is the aim for new knowledge or the jury’s search for a solution in the case. “12 Angry Men” displays how emotions can aid our judgment. When the juror’s expressed outrage, it was because they had heard something that they didn’t approve of therefore, they expressed an emotion that reflected their opinion.
Rather than traditional anger, he seems to suggest that anger is meant to refer to the recognition of the suppression of their culture by the invading force of American culture, which should foster a conscious need to remain separate from said culture. In “The Trial of Thomas Builds-the-Fire,” Thomas states: “Some may have wanted to kill me for my arrogance, but others respected my anger, my refusal to admit defeat” (Alexie 98). If this sentiment were transposed into another equation similar to the survival equation Alexie wrote about, it would read “anger = resilience.” Anger is rooted in the wrongs of the past for the Native Americans. When combined, as Alexie suggests in his equation, with a strong imagination that can envision a better world or at least a future where Indian culture can be positively viewed, the product is survival in the
Conversely, rage is solely out of self-interest and a byproduct of not being loved.
12 Angry Men:-Psychological Behaviour Analysis Signs Of attributions There were many examples of attribution errors and biases in the movie. For example (an actor observer bias) the kid (Victim) is known to have yelled "I'm going to kill you" on the night of the murder. Cobb says no one would threaten to kill anyone unless he mean it (internal attribution)(0:46:25)&(0:46:45) .But after some time Fonda involves cobb into some argument and indirectly makes him yell "I'll kill you".
The movie “Twelve Angry Men” illustrates lots of social psychology theories. This stretched and attractive film, characterize a group of jurors who have to decide the innocence or guiltiness of an accused murder. They are simply deliberating the destiny of a Puerto Rican teenaged boy accused of murdering his father. Initially, as the film begins, except the juror Davis (Henry Fonda), all other jurors vote guilty. Progressively, the jurors begin trying to compromise on a point that everybody agree because the decision of the jury has to be unanimous.