A letter written by Lois Frazier consists of additional opinions, on Jeremy Rifkin’s article “A Change of Heart about Animals.” Rifkin is an animal rights advocate, he conveys his belief that animals are quite similar to humans. Frazier supports Rifkin’s humane ideas and voices several novel opinions of disproportionate rights, such as confinement, affliction, and depletion. In the letter, she sheds light on concerning topics that Rifkin does not address. She first concentrates on an animal’s right to be free and live in a safe environment. Then elucidates her solutions and goes into further details.
so there is no doubt that violating animal rights is an ethical issue that leads us to take a good look and appreciate more the issue we are heading up to .However some people now a days claim that the right place for animals is in zoos, aquariums and circus because to them animals are just serving their slaughtered needs for food sport and fashion,with the ignorance of killing their natural habitat by keeping them in zoos, and the suffer that animals go through in
In the article A Change of Heart, the author exemplifies different animals and tests based on how they feel toward one and other. He also explains how the wild creatures feel, sense, and can attract its own emotions. Jeremy Rifkin, a political science writer, the author of the article infers, “they [animals] feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love -- and these findings are changing how we view animals” (2). What the author has stated is that with the same moral features animals
In Jeremy Rifkin’s article, “A Change of Heart about Animals”, proves his statement that many of our fellow creatures also “feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love..”. I agree that animals share similar feelings as us, and I believe that they should be treated in a way that they can feel comfortable and care in their surroundings. Just because animals may not be completely the same as us, that should not give the right to a human to mistreat and abuse of an animal’s life. Animals can be well treated and cared for without giving them the right to be treated as a human. In Victoria
They won’t think otherwise before killing a person. Animals who are able to surpass these barriers are able to receive our empathy and their rights, but in Jeremy Rifkin’s, “A Change of Heart About Animals,” he talks ideas about all animals should receive our empathy for great acts of the few. The individual animal receive its equal rights, not by a single entity achieving it for the mass, but by the individual must showing intelligences, emotions and feelings, and most importantly, the ability to co-exist with others; including human and other animals alike. An animal must show intelligences, the ability to communicate, solve problems, and follow simple instructions. In “A Change of Heart About Animals,” Rifkin refers to a gorilla, named Koko, who learned sign language.
It was assumed the animals with wisdom would govern the farm as shown, "... the pigs, who were manifestly cleverer than the other animals, should decide all questions of farm policy." (ch.5 pg.47) It all clearly points to the fact that all animals (and humans) have different strengths and different jobs and that they are not equal. This is also the case because some of the animals capabilities elevated their status within their society. This inequality sometimes helped the farm by providing a firm government but often lead to harsh mistreatment of many of the animals. The only reason animals often listened to the leader was because he had ferocious dogs protected him and in certain cases he used that power to protect his own interests.
In the article All Animals Are Equal, written by Peter Singer addresses the inadequacies surrounding the rights of animals in the societies of today. Singer opens the article by presenting a scholarly parallels between the fight for gender equality, banishment of racism and the establishment of rights for “nonhumans.” In order to explain this constant set of inequalities that seem to riddle our society, Singer readily uses the term “speciesism”, which he acquired from a fellow animals rights advocator, Richard Ryder. Essentially, this term is defined by Singer as a prejudice or attitude of bias in favor of the interests of members of one's own species and against those of members of other species. Singer claims that if this idea of speciesism
Having exotic and large animals secured in enclosures, these places also allow researchers and scientists to perform studies to better help us understand the way animals work. This could be helpful in saving more of them. 3. Zoos help with animal survival. Out in the wild, some animals would have a very little chance to survive, especially those on the endangered list.
In the book, “Animal Liberation” the author, Peter Singer, defines “speciesism” and how animals and humans should be considered equally due to the fact that they both feel pleasure and pain. Singer’s focus is more towards the way we should treat animals and feels that they should
Gary Paulsen is targeting on the style related with man vs. nature for most of his work. In fact, they engages that style to help such a magnitude that his fictional reputation continues to be constructed all around this. Paulsen writes not simply connected with mankind's battle next to nature, but also connected with his or her capability to live harmoniously together with nature, demonstrating his love along with respect intended for nature. Brian's communion while using the animals using to whom he or she gives you his area displays Paulsen's view which Brian contains yet another portion of the surrounding rather than a separate business. He undergoes lots of the exact same struggling how the dogs knowledge.