Imagine the numbers are as one percent of the convicted are wrongfully convicted that is still a significant amount of people serving prison sentences for nothing. The recidivism in many cases are so strong and that idea once a criminal always a criminal gets set in. In the event a person who truly is not a criminal gets sentenced to prison and learns to be a criminal while in prison. Are all of their crimes exonerated when they are freed from the original conviction or are they a slave to the situation they were placed in due to the courts wrongdoing? There is an unlimited amount of questions that can come from the wrongful convictions.
Rapists receive years of imprisonment for the crime they have committed as far as discipline. However, they do not receive the mental help they need to understand why they did it and to help them to not do it again. Serial killers are reprimanded but do not get the mental assistance they need to help them with this illness. A drug addict that has been arrested multiple times for acting upon the effects of the drugs they are on so they receive jail time. Drug addicts don 't need jail they need rehabilitation to help with their addiction.
The federal charges Devries face was credit card fraud, money laundering, and embezzlement. The crimes stated above carry 121 months in prison, restitution, and other charges. Everyone in the community wanted to max for each charge, however the suspect made a deal with the state federal prosecutor. Under the circumstances, the deal stood for Devries to serve 110 months in a federal state prison without a chance for parole. The prison’s sentence occurred to be lite from the sentence that was requested by law.
The purpose of this paper is to examine recidivism and public perception. Every year thousands of ex-offenders are returned to prison for a variety of reasons. Many jurisdictions lack the resources for ex-offenders to have a successful return to society (James, 2011). The disadvantages of recidivism effects not only the lives of felons, but also their families and surrounding communities. Recidivism occurs when a person has been previously incarcerated, and later released, reoffends, and returns to the correctional system.
Jail bonds are the specified amount of money an accused person must pay to get out of jail as soon as possible while awaiting trial. I believe that these jail bonds violate the human right of no unfair detainment. These Jail bonds are discriminatory against the poor and working middle class as the amount to be paid sometimes is so high that most middle class people and below can’t afford to pay this bail. The purpose of these jail bonds are to ensure the person will stay and await their trial, however if everyone is innocent until proven guilty why do accused people have to buy their freedoms? Jail bonds are a violation of human rights because they contradict the Bill of Rights, discriminate against the poor,
After reading both articles about incarceration, I am in more support of the article The Greatest Correctional Myth: Winning the War on Crime Through Incarceration. There are many reasons as to why I chose to support the claims made in this article. Firstly, almost everyone who has been previously incarcerated or is currently incarcerated will eventually be released back into society. With that being said, the way our correctional system is set up is not beneficial for those released convicts. Having individuals locked up and hidden from society is not the right way to go about punishment.
Personally, I do not think that a person shall be sentenced to death regardless of how bad the crime is. The government is not morally fit to make the decision to take someones’ life away, but they can put the person in prison if the judge is convinced the person did the crime. The decisions being made are not always going to be correct. What if the person being accused is totally innocent and they have already served plenty years in prison? Should there be reparations for the person who was wrongfully accused?
Everyone makes mistakes in life, some are excusable and some are not. Thomas Hobbes felt that if there were no contract then people would just act on instinct- rape, pillage etc- human beings in their natural state are inclined to war and distrust. There is a reason why we have the prison system, so that criminals pay for their actions and to protect the people. He states he has a wife that is expecting and two kids on the way. If he is a good and harmless guy as he states he is then it would never cross his mind to being involved in an
Members of a gang, when arrested, will sometimes take larger sentences than they would if they would have come clean and admit their mistakes. But the fear of being perceived as a snitch is far too great compared to the fear of many years in prison. This is why apologies and owning up to mistakes just do not suffice for everybody. Going on with the topic of apologies bringing shame rather than pride, serial murderer and cannibal Jeffrey Dahmer was left with a pressing moral conflict when deciding whether or not to admit to his crimes. Dahmer was so afraid of disappointing his father, that he would have accepted the guilt of a dirty conscience rather than apologizing publicly, to the victim’s families.
Emma Damare Professor Jones English 103 5 February 2018 Death Penalty: More Harmful than Helpful The death penalty has been around causing problems for decades, starting before the 1800’s and still creating issues today. The only people who gain anything from having the death penalty is the government. This is because they determine whether or not the inmate is “curable” from their possible mental sickness based on the crime they commit. Some inmates get out for good behavior or parole, but the rest aren’t given a second chance at life. Why is the death penalty a bad thing to have?