Why did we choose this? Justify its relevance. Content analysis is a strategy for outlining any type of object by checking different parts of its essence. This empowers a more target assessment than contrasting elements in light of the impressions of an audience. Content examination starts with distinguishing research directions and picking a unit or examinations.
Research Design This study will use a qualitative, descriptive research methodology. Qualitative research can be defined as an overarching concept of several forms of research which help to illuminate and explain the meaning of phenomenon in social settings (Merriam, 1998). The data collection methodologies included in qualitative research are observations, interviews, and analysis of written documents and artifacts (Patton, 2002). The interview using the guide questions will allow for greater analysis of individual depth and detail. The case study method is the preferred choice of methodology given that it allows the researcher to explore additional avenues of information that may arise in the case study of the participating higher education institution (HEI).
The categories and concepts are grounded in the data, which gives them validity in the real world, but the interpretation and construction of theory results from the researcher's interaction with the data. In grounded theory, the researcher is encouraged to develop some level of abstraction, objectivity and sensitive to words and statements throughout the research process (Patton, 1990). It is therefore worth considering grounded theory methodology for examining managerial
Conclusion This paper has thus far considered multiple aspects of the book’s research design, considering both its strengths and its weaknesses. While its methodological advantages lie in its approach to data, these are also tempered by counterfactuals, the questionability of the validity of its sources, the strong possibilities of confounding variables and its fundamental assumptions regarding the unit homogeneity of its independent
This means that, opposed to being an individual, more ideas and creativity can be incorporated in order to achieve the goal. 2.2. Question 3: Academic writing, research and referencing 3.1.1. Vuuren, Stein and Van Der Merwe (2014) states that: “Your general sources should be Relevant, Readily available and Reliable.” This is a process for proper research and it can be further elaborated. Relevance This part of the process is about how pertinent the source is, which depends on the content of the information, the style that it’s written in (e.g.
Descriptive phenomenology is the method of choice in this study since the researcher is interested in seeking objective and unbiased findings within the participants’ answers. As well as searching for forms inside the meanings of the studied phenomena by asking participants who have experienced phenomena using open exploratory questions (Guignon, 2012). However, if the researcher aims to reveal the hidden meaning instead of the normal one and go beyond from description to interpretation then interpretative phenomenology is the method of choice (Cooney,
In order to unmask the some other secreted factors which were not recognized by quantitative analysis, qualitative method of data collection was also used. Qualitative analysis is an efficient tool for obtaining information regarding values, attitude, opinions and behavior of specific population (Mack et al., 2005). Qualitative investigation in current study was mainly based on key informant interviews. The key informants are the informed people whose experiences, views and annotations relevant to the specific topic; are shared by the researchers in order to explore a occurrence under study (Patton, 1990). Different people have different capabilities for explaining and verbally expressing information however, it is useful to take small number
Mixed methods approach can also be useful when one methodology does not provide the information that is required (Bulsara, n.d). Thus, the use of mixed methods is important because it is more than simply collecting and analysing both kinds of data; it also involves the use of both approaches in tandem so that the overall strength of the study is greater than either qualitative or quantitative research (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2007) and it is exploratory. The data provided by qualitative method is data typically collected in the participants’ setting, data analysing inductively building from particulars to general themes, and the researcher making interpretations of the meaning of the data (Creswell, 2007). The purpose of mixed methods is that both quantitative and qualitative research in combination provides a better understanding of a research problem than either research approach alone. The aspects of using mixed methods raises issues such as
The mixed methods approach –both quantitative and qualitative methods— has been used for collecting and analyzing data in this study. This approach provides a better understanding of subjects of study and hopefully offset the weaknesses of qualitative and quantitative methods when we used alone. As Crestwell (2003) proposed, in this strategy, the researcher collects both quantitative and qualitative data at the same time, then compares the two data sets to see if there is convergent, difference, or some combination (p.
It is primarily an exploratory research and is used to understand the innate often unexpressed reasons, opinions, and motivations of people (test subjects). It provides insights into the problem or helps to develop ideas or hypotheses for potential quantitative research (Harwick, 2016). It can also aide in identifying trends in people’s opinions give deeper insights to the problem (Harwick, 2016). Structured and unstructured are the two types of Qualitative methods for collecting data. Focus groups, individual interviews etc.
According to Berg and Lune (2012), focus groups are a valuable tool for an ethnographer. The focus group can be used in different ways; from gathering information to start a project, to gauging attitudes about a topic or validating information that an informant/interviewee has described. Much in the way one would get a second opinion from a doctor after a diagnosis, a focus group can strengthen the insight obtained and potentially uncover other cultural information, terminologies and even subcultures. Unlike individual interviews, a focus group can be broader reaching and more dynamic, but could potentially be sabotaged by stronger participants. It is through the group’s discussion that information is gathered, one individual’s comments
Is the design appropriate, given the research question? Does the design end itself to a thorough, in-depth intensive examination of the phenomenon of interest? The qualitative design is appropriate to my research question. Given my research project is broad and complex, this design allowed me to refine my ideas and goals. This design allowed me to follow a path that leads to understanding of past experiences or occurrences in evaluating the effectiveness of universal MRSA screening.