(Brennen, 2013) With the strengths of the both qualitative research and quantitative research, triangulation research method will be conducted to enhance and validate the research. Triangulation research Triangulation research is a term which refers to the integration of quantitative and qualitative data within a single study. (Park, 2012) The combination of two research methods leads to a greater validity to the paper as there are variation in data collection from different perspectives. Triangulation research is frequently used to have a comprehensive data and a better understanding of the quantitative results and qualitative findings. In this research paper, triangulation research is conducted by distributing surveys and conducting an in-depth interview.
Research Design This study will use a qualitative, descriptive research methodology. Qualitative research can be defined as an overarching concept of several forms of research which help to illuminate and explain the meaning of phenomenon in social settings (Merriam, 1998). The data collection methodologies included in qualitative research are observations, interviews, and analysis of written documents and artifacts (Patton, 2002). The interview using the guide questions will allow for greater analysis of individual depth and detail. The case study method is the preferred choice of methodology given that it allows the researcher to explore additional avenues of information that may arise in the case study of the participating higher education institution (HEI).
Because of the way that it can be connected to analyze any bit of correspondence, content analysis is utilized as a part of numerous practice fields, running from showcasing and media, to writing, ethnography and social investigations, human science and political science, and numerous different fields of requests. Moreover, content analysis mirrors an association with political and psycholinguistics which assumes a vital part in the improvement of false
Additionally, both quantitative and qualitative researchers use techniques to verify their data. Quantitative investigators incorporate numerous control procedures and random sampling techniques to maximize internal and external validity. Respectively, qualitative researchers use an array of methods for assessing the auditability or credibility of qualitative research (Tuli 2010; Lincoln & Guba 1985). Lastly, Onwuegbuzie and Leech (2005) also note how both type of inquirers attempt to explain complex relationships that exist in the social science
4. Methodology: 4.1. Qualitative Research methodology: We will be using the Qualitative research methodology for collecting and analysing the data for this project report. Qualitative research can be defined as a broad base methodological approach, one that can encompass many research methods. Qualitative methods help examine not just “what”,” where”,” when”, or even "who" but also the “why” and “how” of decision making.
More and more people have astonish worked in their fields they research on their fields and bring new era in their fields. Theories, methods, and tools It is difficult to describe the system thinking as compare others.To clarify something based on huge knowledge & investigation. Its also use altos of tools hardware and software to achieve the extensive results. System thinking is well known by its theories, tolls and methods Theories like Catastrophe theory, Cybernetics, Chaos theory, General systems theory, Learning organizations theory, Path dependency theories, Punctuated equilibrium. And methods like Agent-based modeling, Network Analysis, Scenario planning, Systems dynamics modeling.
Section III. Choice of Research Method: Quantitative, Qualitative or Mixed? The selection of data analysis techniques to deal with research questions or hypotheses and the techniques chosen for the data collection is informed and guided by what we call the research method. Hence, research method is a procedure, and also the analytical techniques to be chosen and the methods to be chosen will also be dictated by the choices of the methodologies made and by the theoretical framework (Sumner and Tribe, 2008). Research methods for knowledge claim and strategies is of three types: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods.
Each individual knower gains knowledge through the ways of knowing reason and emotion (amongst others); these ways of knowing shape and are shaped by our perspective. More often than not, the knowledge that we pursue has been given to us by another knower, especially in areas of knowledge like history; in this case the previous knowers perspective also shapes our pursuit of knowledge. Thus, in areas of knowledge where shared knowledge is pivotal we draw upon a shared perspective, not just that of the individual knower. Due to perspective affecting knowledge in such a magnitude of ways, it is essential in all areas of knowledge. Through exploring the pursuit of knowledge in three different areas of knowledge: the arts, history and the natural sciences, it becomes apparent, that although to different extents, perspective is essential in shaping each.
Energies are engaged to systematically develop theory, but the two approaches to the research task is different. The qualitative researcher's emphasis is on the construction of the theory to agree with data, and the quantitative researcher's emphasis is on the testing of the theory to prove. The difference in approach may, in part, be due to the differences in the phenomena being studied, and the questions asked and the techniques considered appropriate for confirming or refuting the conjecture (Morse, 1996). Qualitative research requires methodological versatility; researchers have to create the knowledge fitting their research group through any of numerous strategies that depends on design, and therefore have an extensive knowledge of social science theory, to interact competently with others, and persistently focus on objective, and single-mindedly commit to research. He/she, the researcher must constantly distinguish between another's world and that of the participant researcher, and yet become close enough to the lives of another that it be both experienced and analyzed
Interdisciplinary research involves integrating knowledge and methods from different disciplines, using a synthesis of approaches (Repko et al., 2017). Basically, in interdisciplinary research, incorporating perspectives from multiple disciplines allows people to construct a more comprehensive understanding of a problem being addressed (Repko et al., 2017). There are both advantages and disadvantages to interdisciplinary research. The main advantage is that interdisciplinary research both draws from and integrates the different backgrounds and perspectives of multiple disciplines and then combines them into a single functioning unit, which allows for a more comprehensive understanding of a problem (Repko et al., 2017). Interdisciplinary research fosters greater critical thinking, synthesizes multiple disciplines, and develops life-long learning skills (Jones, 2010).
Is the design appropriate, given the research question? Does the design end itself to a thorough, in-depth intensive examination of the phenomenon of interest? The qualitative design is appropriate to my research question. Given my research project is broad and complex, this design allowed me to refine my ideas and goals. This design allowed me to follow a path that leads to understanding of past experiences or occurrences in evaluating the effectiveness of universal MRSA screening.