it’s ok, we’re not angry.’” (Benway 355). My topic of inquiry relates the effects of both genetics and upbringing on childhood development. This quote shows the correlation that parenting styles do affect how a child's personality develops, and genetics are not the only factor in personality development.
The exposure to a child’s birth culture will help the child decide if their birth and/or adopted culture accurately reflects their identity
Ridley talks about facts and uses logic in regard of divorce rates in twins and criminal records of adoptees in Denmark. Closely observing that divorce rates in twins are partly supported by genetic variation and partly by non-shared environmental factors, it was concluded that, “You are no more likely to divorce if reared in a broken home than the average.” This shows that non-shared environment-- home and parents-- do not affect the person’s choices, characters or personalities but it is rather the environment consisting of peers along with genes that play a role. Similarly adoptees that have a criminal record usually diminish once adopted in a neighbourhood and going to school with non-criminal backgrounds and good morals even if biological and adopting parents have a criminal background. These two examples show strong reasons to support Ridley’s
The first-born children have a certain identity because of the way their parents raised them. The mother and father both have most likely never raised a child before, and are therefore very over-protective and concerned about everything their child does. For example, Gross shows how parenting affects a first-borns identity when she states, “Because they have so much control and attention from their first-time parents, they are over-responsible, reliable, well-behaved, careful and smaller versions of their own parents.” The first child develops an identity based on how his or her mother and father are paying attention to every single move the child makes.
Levitt and Dubner discuss different factors that do and do not have a significant role in creating higher test scores. Levitt and Dubner concluded that a “child’s academic abilities are far more influenced by the IQs of his biological parents.” This is apparent due to the nature of adoption, typically those adopting are of higher economic class (adoption is expensive), are more educated, and are born into a better household. A person who puts their child up for adoption is more likely to be less educated, younger and more likely to “not take the same prenatal care as a woman who is keeping her baby.” This revelation was the fundamental argument of chapter 5: no matter what a parent does, the strongest correlation between higher performances in children is genetics.
Throughout the story, there are subtle hints suggesting Caroline subconsciously or genetically mimics certain behavioral similarities exhibited by her birth mother. Barring disease, certainly, the topic of personality formation is interesting to ponder in fiction or in reality. Ultimately, as a society, in relation to adoption, discussions can become destructive. Each day, in the United States, more than 400,000 children are in foster care, many of these youngsters eventually become available for adoption.
Society most of the time recognized exceptional individuals, whose performance in sports, science, arts, politics is vastly superior to that of the rest of the population. Speculations On the cause of these individuals’ extraordinary abilities and performance are as old as the first records of their accomplishments. Such as the influence of the ecology of the bodies, or the incidence of the stars and planets the day of the birth, or special gifts. As the humanity evolution all these theories loose acceptation. Others believed that the illustriousness of these individuals is inherited.
My birthday is in October 2001, meaning that I am unfortunately often the youngest in my class. According to the Matthew effect, I should have difficulties keeping up since “it’s hard for a five-year-old to keep up with a child born many months earlier” (Gladwell 28). In the 1990s, my parents immigrated to the United States from China. With them, they brought the Asian ideology where hard work triumphs over any adversity, since they themselves came from extremely poor families. Over the years, I have been taught discipline and endurance, which ultimately led to my academic success.
Kaffir Boy Essay: Passbooks In Kaffir Boy, Mark Mathabane describes how a small stack of papers carried by people in Alexandra sustains control over their existence. These “papers” define the whole life of an African person without any type of documentary reinforcements. In Alexandra, people are forced to bear passbooks at all times to strictly limit the movements of black Africans.
As Karl Marx famously said “[People] make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past." Likewise, the selection of her family and the environment in which she lived were not determined by Baby. Baby was born in an unstable and derelict environment, paired with minimal parental support
In our life, we often have experiences that teach us how and what we want to be like when we grow up. Everyone has ups and downs from time to time that make one want to stop and other times make one want to run while individually they feel free. The Garden Story by Katherine Mansfield and The First Born Son by Ernest Buckler both show how parental pressure, social pressure, and family pressure around an individual can influence the way one will treat others. Once in a while it is an advantage when they want to change the world to make it better for others, but oftentimes it is for the worse because they personally accept the problems they have and never trying to fix them. Both stories have parental influences that want them to stay as they are, tradition influences that professions stay in the family, and they are always compared to the better child that is more like by parents.
In the afterword the author talks about some of the speculations people have as to why Wes 1 and Wes 2 ended up so different. Naturally, the question of genetics and nature always comes up as an explanation for the defining difference between the two Wes Moores. On the other hand, certain points in the nature/upbringing of the two Wes Moores, such as Wes 2’s parents neglecting birth control, were speculated as the defining reason for the outcomes of the two Wes Moores. The author emphasizes that all these factors are actually woven together (Moore, 183). Similarly, the concepts of nature and nurture are closely meshed in the field of psychology (Textbook, 73).
Having a unique childhood with distinguishable experiences will shape a person’s maturity and sophistication levels more so than their age. Some people were not
In David Rettew’s TED talk, “Child Temperament: How We Start to Become Ourselves,” he defines what child temperament is, where it came from, how it could be developed over time, and how parents should respond to their children’s temperaments (Rettew, 2015). Children contain different temperaments, such as being anxious, angry, or calm (Rettew, 2015). According to twin studies, 50-60 percent of temperament is genetics, while the rest of the percentage comes from other influences, such as from the environment (Rettew, 2015). The type of environment a child is exposed to could influence a child’s temperament by them adapting certain traits to test if they are a good fit for that environment (Rettew, 2015). There is a correlation between the environment
The book I have chosen to review is Boy 21, a fictional read that is written by Matthew Quick. Quick is a New York Times best-selling author debuting in novels such as The Silver Linings Playbook and Love May Fail. To best describe this book, it is a captivating read that is comforting for the mind, as it canvasses the raw and unflinching life of a high school senior who displays love for basketball and life relationships. Furthermore, set in a troubled Belmont city of Philadelphia, Quick incorporates the presence of mobs and violence which is captivating towards the reader and audience. I was intrigued about how the novel was written through Finley the main protagonist, which was Quick’s childhood perspective of life in Philadelphia and his passion towards basketball.
