1994 saw South Africa getting its chance of the first democratic elections from the hands of a Nationalist Party, the apartheid government-ruling party which ruled the country from 1948. The new government, under the African National Congress (ANC) came with political, economic and social changes that saw South African as one of the most respected democratic countries in the world. The current South African film industry (post-apartheid cinema) emerged as a result of governmental involvement, private initiatives, and the country’s emergence as one of the top-five production locations in the world (McCluskey, 2009). Nonetheless, the country’s industry is still struggling with establishing and developing the local audience for its products. The responsibility for this struggle is partly attributed to the apartheid film industry which served white consumers only with little access to black audiences. A historical influence of South African cinema dominated by white oppression, white supremacy, and white nationalism has …show more content…
According to Lott (1991), when defining black cinema, ‘blackness’ – as a concept - is always a burden because it is often defined based on biological or cultural criteria. In the context of this research paper, “blackness” will be defined in political terms, which means, any people that were politically, economically and socially oppressed by slavery, colonialism, apartheid. In this sense, blackness in the South African context includes Blacks, Indians, and Coloureds. With regards to the definition of blackness, Thomas Cripps’ defines ‘black cinema’ as a “cinematic experience that is produced, written and performed by black people primarily for black audiences (Cripps in Lott, 1991:40). I define a cinema of Black Consciousness not as a cinema of black filmmakers, but as an inclusive cinema for any filmmaker of any skin colour who is willing to use cinema as a tool for the needs of black
In contrast, Nelson’s film was “seemless and easy-to-follow” and It displayed race relations and politicized
The documentary "The Black Power Mixtape 1967-1975" directed by Göran Olsson explores the Black Power Movement in this time period. It distinct itself from other documentary in the way it presents its content and arguments. This is mostly due to the fact that the footage was taken at the time, while many commentaries are from the 21st century. Authenticity and an informed presentation of events are reinforced through several social codes. However, both, the archival footage as well as the film were created by a Swedish film team and it begins by presenting an outside perspective of the makers themselves.
In the essay Two Afro-American Contributions to Dramatic Form, Eleanor Traylor talks of the roots and traditions that were brought to the original American theatre from black African-Americans. The importance of knowing where devices and ideas come from is important in all things, but in theatre we sometimes seem to overlook these things. Instead of discovering where our entertainment comes from , we as a society look at the believability or even the fantasy of the thing and then leave our opinion at face value. Discovering where the stories originated and how they have transformed is just as important to current theatre.
Many of the speakers are frustrated at the fact that systemic racism is still very much alive, yet they remain professional. They discuss issues and problems in detail to give the audience a full understanding of the topic. Because of this and their desire to be direct, glossing-over details and censorship does not occur. The documentary has two main points of discussion: the history of oppression in America, and the prison industrial-complex. During the first half of the film, wherein the speakers discuss the discrimination of African-Americans, the tone used is factual and [smth].
For one, black people did not get the opportunity or given the chance by society to be able represent themselves through media and cinema. As black people, they were unable to present themselves as themselves in attempt to show a correct view of the black experience, but instead that moment was taken away from them, which can be dated back in black history, which deals with the power struggle between black and white people. In economy, and especially looking into cinema and film, white people have always had an upper hand on black people, carrying all the power in their hands, and choosing not to share the power amongst the American people. Finding a positive representation of black people, especially in today’s context, can prove to be challenging because according to white people, black people
In Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s essay “The Disuniting of America”, was more descriptive and informative. Schlesinger gives very good pints as well. Schlesinger talks about how other races cannot well are told they cannot, reenact or direct films about blacks. Schlesinger provides more examples. I believe by providing clear examples the reading is more understanding about what is going on.
Within the documentary, a segment focused on the critically acclaimed motion picture, Birth of a Nation. The motion picture was not only a major blockbuster, but according to it also confirmed the beliefs of “White America” wanted to see. The movie depicted blacks in a lewd and terrible manner. The white political elite needed black bodies working, and the Birth of a Nation provided with cause to make blacks criminals. By being deemed criminals, whatever human rights a black person had, were automatically taken away.
Briley suggests, “Birth of a Nation was calculated to arouse hatred and predjustice between whites and the Negro races” (455). Although D.W. Griffith firmly believed his film did not shame the African American culture, Briley emphasizes, “The film director considered himself a progressive and did not believe the film slandered African Americans” (455). However, the view of African Americans and their culture was shifted dramatically by this
Diversity is something I stand for. I am half Caucasian, half African-American. My parents adopted me at birth and although they had two Caucasian sons already, they accepted me as one of their own and two years later adopted another biracial baby girl. Diversity has been my whole life, not conforming to one race or the other, but accepting both and all others. Film, through my eyes, knows no color
Ethnicity and Hollywood Racism is always issues which take a huge part of American history. Until the twenty-first century, although people tried to make the country becomes the freedom and equality nation, these issues are still happening everywhere. According to "In Living Color: Race and American Culture," Stuart Hall argues that racism is still widespread in the society and "it is widely invisible even to those who formulate the world in its terms" (qtd. in Omi 683). Indeed, situations about race quietly exist in the movie industry, which "has led to the perpetuation of racial caricatures" to the majority audiences and even minority audiences (Omi 629).
Have you ever wondered why most American movies portray people with color or origin as terrorists, maids, or just secondary characters? Have you ever thought of why specific ethnicities and races are represented most of the time as inferiorities? The representation of race, gender, and ethnicity in the media is accompanied by a stuff stereotype, and this is leads to the negativity and discrimination in our society today. I have chosen the movie “Maid in Manhattan” since it portrays and handles the issues of race discrimination and social class inequality. I will be handling each issue separately.
Throughout the 70s, innovative and impactful movies featuring heavy African-American involvement hit the scene of thousands of theaters across the United States. The overall positive perception of Blaxploitation films provided many opportunities for black involvement in America’s entertainment industry that Hollywood failed to provide. Audiences positively perceived things that were not brought to light in the white dominated entertainment industry such as, new stereotype defying roles, uplifting messages, and the exposure of different communities and their issues. Blaxploitation was a result from African-Americans having a very strong desire to “see themselves empowered” in films (Christian). This genre of 70s cinema, were mostly set
One of the most important events was the Civil Rights Movement which responded to a racial discrimination towards African-Americans during the 1950s (Berry, 2009). The growing power of the movement had much influences on American society, including on Hollywood and film industry. It caused a number of the large film productions began to involve more black casts and also shifted the representations and views of African-Americans in films (Siham, 2010). Things slowly changed thanks to actor Sidney Poitier’s arrival on several Hollywood scenes, and his name quickly became synonymous during the 1960s (L. Johnson, 2017). Poitier pushed Hollywood’s boundaries of racial integration in film even further (Siham, 2010).
The film reflects on the struggles of South Africa and reaches out to the audience, knowing that many would have lived through the terrible apartheid period and Eastwood uses this too seek to inform them on the massive change that South Africa went through as a result of the effective and immense leadership of Nelson
Being a visual medium of presentation, a film creates an instant, direct and more convincing impression on its audience fulfilling its dual purpose of entertaining as well as sensitizing the audience. A lot of movies based on social issues are now being made to create awareness among people about the issues besides entertaining the audience, which is perhaps the foremost purpose behind the making