The chemicals are everywhere Chemicals have always been a part of our life. The chemicals are in things that the people have to have to live a normal life. We do not always think about it, but many of the chemicals are actually very dangerous. Examinations has shown, that the chemicals used in everyday products can have an effect in our health. Some of the chemicals actually makes the risk of getting a dangerous disorder very high. This is a serious problem, because most humans are in contact with chemicals everyday. The chemicals are almost everywhere. In the shampoo, plastic toys, water bottles and so on. Even smells can have serious amounts of chemicals in it. Gordon Gribble who is a chemistry professor says: “Most people don’t know they are routinely exposes to a host of compounds in non-toxic concentrations in what they eat and drink each day” He also says, that the chemicals also are in the air most people breathe, but it’s not dangerous because it is not inhaled in large amounts. The chemicals is everywhere We are all in contact with chemicals. Everyday. Maybe we don’t think about it, but the chemicals are almost …show more content…
Is we go 100 years back in time the amount of chemicals was not as big as today. Because the society is evolving people gets more and more modern. And that means the things have to be in a definite way. That makes the use of chemicals necessary. The chemicals are in many things so it will be hard to remove it all. And many people don’t even think that is is possible because of the evolution. People are used to the things with lots amount of chemicals in it and it would be difficult to remove it. The sad thing is, that the people don’t care about their health but only on the smart things they have in their everyday life. But can we do anything about it? Is there a way to replace the dangerous chemicals with some less dangerous
Carson appeals to the arousal of the basic emotions, such as the arousal of fear in the public. Carson also appeals to pathos, or the emotions, by questioning the “highly intelligent” creators of these pesticides. Carson believes irrational bad decisions based on faulty evidence threaten the future existence of mankind. “Along with the possibility of the extinction of mankind by nuclear war, the central problem of our age has therefore become the contamination of man’s total environment with such substances of incredible potential for harm-substances that accumulate in the tissues of plants and animals and even penetrate the germ cells to shatter or alter the very material of heredity upon which the shape of the future depends.” However, the statement supports Carson’s intention to present a persuasive, and logical point of view without confusing the reader; suggesting she ment to go against a patient audience rather than an impatient one.
Although this chemical helped at the time, it ruined lives in the
Styrene is most commonly found in an industrial workplace. Styrene can alter the DNA sequence. However, by limiting exposure to cancer causing chemicals, longevity of life can be preserved. Also, in Document B, it states, “Much cancer is caused by ‘environmental factors’ broadly defined to include food,drink, and habits such as smoking tobacco and basking in the sun.” The chance of being diagnosed with cancer depends on the extent of exposure to a carcinogen.
A New York Times article examines the changing of EPA regulations regarding toxic chemicals. Despite scientists warning that certain chemicals cause birth defects, cancer, and other health issues, the EPA has made it harder to evaluate the effects of these chemicals and thus regulate them. The deregulation has been spearheaded by a representative of the chemical industry, who now holds a high position in the EPA. The decision to deregulate chemicals that pose a danger to the public is a prime example of the trend that government increasingly caters to powerful interests.
Chemical warfare has been brought up multiple times throughout history. One of the most significant times chemical weapons have been used was during World War I. World War I introduced chemical weaponry to an extreme extent and for harsh purposes. There was a convention created called the Hague Convention which “discussed the issue of using chemicals as weapons” (First). The people within this group foresaw the potential use of chemicals during war, and wanted to try and prevent people being killed by this harsh weapon. There was later a second Hague Convention which added even more restraints to chemical weapons to further deter the use of chemical weapons.
“Toxicity and the Consuming Subject” Summary In Nan Enstad’s essay “Toxicity and the Consuming Subject”, Enstad focuses primarily on the idea of toxicity in today’s consumerist society and how capitalism is the main contributor to the distribution, flexibility, and accessibility of it. The essay begins by telling of reporter David Ewing Duncan that, in an attempt to see how many chemicals are acquired through our water, air, and commodities, tested himself for 320 toxic chemicals and a little over half were found present in his body, many over estimated levels. National Geographic provides evidence of how toxic material is deposited in a consumer’s body through commodities they consume or have been exposed to. In an attempt to illustrate the
There is not a large amount of the chemicals but it can eventually cause harm. Consumers are not aware of what it is they eat and corporations take advantage and use cheaper ingredients. Companies use inhumane factoring to produce their products and consumers are completely unaware by using labeling that promotes it as healthy.
Chemical warfare is the use of harmful chemicals as a weapon, these chemicals can be asphyxiating, poisonous, corrosive, flammable, etc..Chemical warfare was first used during World War One on April 22, 1915 in Ypres, Belgium by German forces. The Germans dropped over 150 tons of chlorine gas, also called bertholite,with the use of artillery bombardment against French Colonial Divisions in Ypres (Second). This first use of chemical warfare proved to be very effective by causing mass panic in the French Colonial Divisions and forced soldiers to retreat and regroup back in Ypres. Following this attack, the British and French began to create and develope their own chemical weapons in response to Germany. At the end of the first World War over 124,000 tonnes of various chemical weapons had been used resulting in more than one million casualties and 90,000 fatalities (History).
Everyday people buy plastic things from the cafeteria, from plastic containers, lids on cups, and things as small as straws, and like 50% of plastic used it will be thrown away after one use. However, do you ever stop and think, what happens to the plastic? If you’re thinking that it just magically goes away you 're wrong. It will most likely end up in a landfill somewhere or in the ocean, and as you may think that your actions do not impact the world, think again. Everyone in the world has at least used one piece of plastic, adding to the problem of plastic pollution and helping certifying the terrifying statisticc that acooording to the 2018 Earth day video, “by 2050 there will more plastic in the ocean than fish”, which almost is impossible to think of.
“Chemists created hundreds of new projects, from medicines such as aspirin to perfumes and soaps. Newly developed chemical fertilizers
In today’s world, there are many people creating new chemical substances that has negative effect to our world. Rachel Carson, in her article "The Obligation to Endure" argues that the pesticides and other chemicals we use are harmful to more than just the environment. I agree with Carson in her article, in that we should reduce most of the harmful chemical use and instead use technological inventions. Carson is a person who seems very passionate about the environment and is very concerned of its inhabitants. It is hard to believe that intelligent human beings would use bad chemicals substances that would affect the environment and themselves negatively.
We all know that it is impossible for pollution to be 100% gone since the cause of it is also from nature itself. But there are always solutions as to how to reduce pollution. It’s unbelievably foolish to know that pollution is the number 1 cause of death, and yet, pollution solutions are relatively low-cost. It’s great that we already have many companies trying to end pollution. Other companies try to be more eco-friendly and, for example, use plastic that decomposes faster.
Gases like Carbon Monoxide have the potential to kill people if taken in large concentration. The consequences of these pollutants in human health are
being used in the traditional foods, but not in organics, but then those chemicals used in the traditional foods are said to be safe for human health. People are beginning to realize as the demand for food has increased with the population growth, so has the use of chemicals fertilizers antibiotics and hormones by farmers and livestock growers. The consumption of produce and meat, grown with the use of these means has led to the increase more diseases and cancers. People are beginning to believe that the only way to have a healthy
CHAPTER 1 1. INTRODUCTION The air we respire contains mixture of natural and man-made chemical, physical and biological elements that modifies ambient air quality. Among all air pollutants, the most threatening for human health include particulate matter and gaseous pollutants such as carbon monoxide, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide (WHO). The movement of people into urban areas and the growth of industry within these areas has carried more people into contact with air pollution than any other time in recent memory.