With the upright things that come with civil disobedience, there are things that aren’t that magnificent. For instance, in a democracy civil disobedience will never, under any circumstances be justified. Also, anarchy will materialize if we do not comply with the rules, even if they are unreasonable. Civil disobedience doesn’t always make an adjustment in a regulation. It may take time for this to generate a change.
As stated before civil disobedience allows for minorities to have say when it comes to making laws. Other forms of protest like legal protest, boycotting, and protest with permit are not as good. These methods are not as likely to get the attention of the majorities because you are not putting yourself at risk and not showing how bad the law is. They also cost money and time for the person to use these forms of protest. If a person performed civil disobedience and got arrested for it, the majority can then see the effect of the
In the Crito by Plato, Socrates argues against civil disobedience, seeing it as an unjust act. Contrasting this view, Martin Luther King argues for civil disobedience against unjust laws, and seeing it as a responsibility of citizens. Civil disobedience is the active refusal to obey certain law, commands or requests of the government. I will argue that the view of Socrates is superior to the view of Martin Luther King on the justness of civil disobedience. Using the argument against harm, I will show that even if a law is viewed as unjust, you must not repay an evil with another evil, as evident in the Crito while contrary to ideas presented by MLK. I will also show that civil disobedience is an action in which it is probable that anarchy will
Rosa Parks is an African American that grew up in one of many segregated cities, Montgomery, Alabama. Being the “First Lady of Civil Rights”, she had many opinions on the daily life of African Americans. But born in Tuskegee, Alabama on February 4th, 1913. She stood up for what she believed was right, and succeeded. Due to her courage, what she did to make history, and her race, Rosa Parks made a statement in the Civil Rights Movement.
Rosa Parks is known for her refusal to surrender her seat to a white passenger on a public bus in Montgomery, Alabama. Due to the bus incident, it caused a citywide boycott, and helped launched a nationwide effort to end segregation in the public. She is one of the greatest people in history, for her beliefs and actions.
One way civil disobedience is effective is because protesters do not use violence which means no one dies, no one gets hurt
Rosa Parks’s influence on the fight for equality was arguably the most impactful of all the leaders in the Civil Rights Movement. Rosa Parks first embarked on her Civil Rights journey by becoming involved with the NAACP. The author of the History website page on Rosa Parks claims, “in December 1943 Rosa also joined the Montgomery chapter of the NAACP, and she became chapter secretary” (Rosa Parks). Rosa started out as a follower, but became dedicated to the organization so she ran for a board position. About ten years later, the famous Rosa Parks story took place in Montgomery. The author of the Rosa Parks page emphasizes that, “By refusing to give up her seat to a white man on a Montgomery, Alabama, city bus in 1955, black seamstress Rosa Parks (1913—2005) helped initiate the civil rights movement in the United States” (Rosa Parks). Simply put, Rosa inspired the rest of the African American communities around the United States to protest through boycotts whenever they had the chance to do so. Determined to get the bus segregation law overturned, Parks and her fellow NAACP
Martin Luther King Jr. and other African American protesters used civil disobedience, and they were effective and became heroes, and the method of civil disobedience proved effective. With civil disobedience, there is more communication between the government and people, and to be a democracy there must be an open avenue to the people. With this open avenue, there is more communication between the government and the people, and more communication between the government and the people helps protect human rights.
Civil disobedience does lead to progress, just like Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. disobeyed the laws which gave African Americans more rights.
“It was time for someone to stand up or in my case, sit down”.( “Bush, Randall k”) . Rosa Parks was an African American woman. She was born in Tuskegee, Alabama. In 1955 Rosa refused to give up her seat on a bus to a white man. Rosa Parks is known for the mother of civil rights;her knowledge in civil rights led to her rebellion against racism and hate.
I am going to tell you about an enchanting story about a woman named Rosa Parks and her mongomery, bus boycott. Rosa Parks was born on February 4,1913 in Tuskegee Alabama U.S.A she died on October 24,2005 [age 92] in Detroit, Michigan U.S. before she got arrested for boycotting a montgomery bus Rosa Parks went to school like a normal child. She was raised up on her daddy's farm and raised as a normal girl but she did have to go to a different school then the white people in 1929 when she was in 11th grade she had to go out of school because her grandmother got sick and she had to help her.
Overall, I believe that civil disobedience depicts a positive element regarding society as a whole. Though it seems like protesting without harm does not carry an instant effect, the long-term effects are what makes it worth while. If Rosa Parks were to physically harm every single white male on that bus, then the situation would've been completely different. However, her composure inspires people to not let the government get a rise out of her. In reality, the more mature a person acts about the situation, the more upset the opposing argument will
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so."-Socrates. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because the society is not free unless it's able to check the government. As long as the protest of the law remains peaceful it is a good thing. It is the public telling the government that they will not let them gain to much power and crush their human rights.
I consider civil disobedience to be an easily-ignored pillar upon which our democracy was founded. In fact we are only established as a nation now because our founding fathers engaged in civil disobedience themselves. We were in a “social contract” of sorts with Great Britain and when we felt that they had not upheld their part of the contract (they did not allow us to create courts to maintain order, or to create a navy to defend ourselves, or to sustain our economy due to an inability to trade with any other countries), Thomas Jefferson concluded that it was our not only our right, but also our duty to break away. And it was Thomas Jefferson that combined all of the works of the great thinkers before him such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke
Civil disobedience has been around for ages and it is still going on to this day.An example of old civil disobedience is the boston tea party where a group of colonists dressed as mohawks went aboard a ship full of tea and threw the tea overboard because of the tax on tea.Hence causing one of the first events of civil disobedience and the Revolutionary War.Meaning Civil disobedience is a way to make political and social change because it can create real change,It draws attention to the situation,And because you can create change without breaking the law.