Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Us Constitution

In 1777 congress adopted the Articles Of Confederation which failed to give the United States an effective government so most the power went to the Federal government. The Articles of Confederation had many problems that would loss of power in the government. The Federal government wanted power in the national government and felt the Constitution would help manage the debt. The Anti-Federalist wanted power in the states and wanted limited federal power. Congress had done things that benefited the United States while the second continental congress created a government that lacked power which cause problems.

At a time many thought that the effects of a revolution would cause another one. The Articles of Confederation was the center of attention for this problem. After the fight for Independence the new America had to have a type of government. The Congress of this newly established nation created the Articles of Confederation. Of course problems would arise due to the ability of them knowing what they didn’t want when they should’ve known what the should have.

What problems would a Federalist have had with the articles of confederation and constitutional convention? A federalist (someone who believes in coexisting and strong federal and state governments) (Morone and Kersh 59) wouldn’t have liked the articles. This is mostly due to its structure (Morone and Kersh 53). Mainly, states had more influence than the federal government ("Independence and the Articles of Confederation."). In one case, because of one state, a tax couldn’t be raised (Morone and Kersh 54).

If the war had not been won, independence would not have been given, and America most likely would not be what it is today. Another reason that the war is impactful is that it led to the ability to have government. The government was also finally able to publish laws. Without success in the war, having a good government would be difficult. This is because in

After the tyranny of the British rule, the new citizens of the United States wanted a severely limited government. They had pushed this idea greatly in the Declaration of Independence. The leaders structured the Articles of Confederation to only have a legislative branch giving each of the

One of these rough patches was the Articles of Confederation, which taught us that a balance of power is of great importance. We abandoned the Articles of Confederation and adopted a new Constitution because of State powers, and lack of Congressional powers. The fear of a Central Government like Great Britain led The United States away from having such a strong Central Government. So the States were given autonomy to make most decisions & have many powers under early American Government. The States could never be enforced to do anything, except for war and closing borders, the States could

The Articles of Confederation, in contrast to the Constitution, deprived Congress of the most basic opportunities. Congress could maintain an army, conduct foreign affairs, declare a war, coin money, and establish post offices. However, Congress could not tax the people, elect a president of the central government, or enforce laws (congressforkids.net). This

Final Exam Question 1 Back in 1787, the Constitutional Convention had to answer a very essential question that would determine the office of the presidency: Should the U.S. even have a president? The Founding Fathers feared executive power such as monarchies, yet they also knew that state governments weren’t strong enough to keep the republic afloat. They had to find a balance between a leader that was both strong and dependable, yet gave a healthy amount of power to the people. In the Constitution, the office of the presidency is vaguely mentioned, yet it mentions three types of powers given to the president: 1) Expressed Powers, which are explicitly granted from the Constitution itself 2) Delegated Powers, or powers granted by Congress, and 3) Inherent Powers, which are assumed by the president during times of crisis. The use of these powers determine if the president is going beyond the limits of the office.

The economic and social structure changes after the French and Indian War inevitably lead to political structure change. Before the war, colonists had, for the most part, their own self-government with little participation by British officials. Royal governors were appointed for most southern states, however their roles were limited. After the war, Great Britain attempted to give more power to British officials so that they could enforce the laws of trade and taxes more prominently. The growing idea of Liberty in the colonies also brought a realization to the colonists that they were in need of "actual" representation in Parliament instead of the "virtual" representation they were given.

In many ways the Constitution was largely a Federalist victory where few but important compromises were made in favor of the Anti-Federalists. When the Articles of Confederation were originally drafted the framers intended to create a government that was the polar opposite of what they had experienced under the authoritarian centralized British rule. With freedom and civil liberties as their main concerns the Articles of Confederation gave ultimate power to the States, with the idea that the 13 states be united under a weak central government that could recommend policies, but without the authority to enforce these policies if the states refused (Shea, Green, Smith 51). “On paper, at least, this Congress had power to conduct foreign affairs,

The U.S. Constitution The U.S. constitution established America’s fundamental laws, National Government, and guaranteed rights for the citizens. We needed this document because our national government was weak and the states where separated into independent countries. There was not a president and this gave congress the power to govern foreign affairs, conduct war and regulate currency. After the United States gained independence from Great Britain our country needed a stronger central government. The Articles of Confederation were the first written constitution of the Untied States.

Without the Bill of Rights, the government could do whatever they wanted to the citizens because the Constitution did not state the rights of the American people. To conclude, the new Constitution created more flaws than benefits for Americans. Although it did help America unite as one nation, it also could’ve fixed simple errors that we have today. The new Constitution made the national government too strong, it gave the President too much power, and it didn’t include a Bill of

With that, they believed that the constitution drafted by the Federalists was not enough to protect individual rights. The Anti Federalists failed due to a lack of organization. They could never get all thirteen states to fully cooperate and create a piece of legislation that could battle the Constitution. Yet in the end, the Articles of Confederation were kept as guidelines to help individual freedoms, of both people and of the

The United States of America is not a democracy for many reasons; Rule by law, we are more a republic than a democracy, and the founders of a nation didn 't want a democracy. Most of the states in the U.S are controlled by laws set by the government. In a democracy the laws created are supposed to be voted on by the people. As of today we need confirmation if the law can be passed by all three legislative branches. This is the complete