Carl Erikson's Concept Of Personality Analysis

950 Words4 Pages
There are different ways to perceive the concept of personality. Some scientists define it as a set of characteristics that are dependent of culture, ethnicity, and gender. The first is the psychoanalytic perspective that describes that the childhood experiences and the unconscious mind are responsible for creating the personality. Erikson described that social elements are important in carrying out the development of individual personality. Carl Jung took an entirely different perspective, and totally focused on personality archetypes which are present in the unconscious mind as a collective identity. The humanistic perspective focuses on the development of free will and personal awareness. It describes that people of inherently good, as long as they are not affected by a bad experience during their developmental years. Another perspective is in terms of traits. This perspective describes that human personality can best described in terms of specific characteristics that allows us to understand how different individuals behave and compare with each other. The social cognitive perspective…show more content…
We all have that undeveloped part of our mind that raises questions of taking part in different pleasures. The superego represents the concept of our inner conscience, which is also termed as our moral compass. This is often developed through our particular experiences in our social setting and therefore, brings in the social element. The ego provides rationality to human decision making in this case, and essentially describes what is “self” in other methodologies such as Jung’s theory of archetypes (Freud, 2011). Although we have different concepts present on personality, I still believe the original concept of Freud as having different parts of human nature conflicting with each other, has the capacity to explain personality development and its rational
Open Document