Crime Control with Due process 1
Crime Control with Due process Christian Rousselle Lethbridge College
Due process protects the legal rights of the accused, to insure that officials from the Criminal Justice 2 system follows procedures when arresting and processing Individuals. Due process makes sure that innocent people are not convicted of criminal offences that they never committed. The criminal Justice Officials are constantly
…show more content…
A witness came forward and said that he saw someone else stab Seale. Ebsary was tried and convicted of manslaughter. Due process was not followed during the process and the Justice System officials went against Marshall’s legal rights, as well as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The reason why the court had found Marshall guilty of murder was not because they believed he did it, but because he was native. In 1990 it was determined systemic racism had contributed to his wrongful imprisonment. "The criminal justice system failed Donald Marshall Jr. at virtually every turn from his arrest and wrongful conviction for murder in 1971 up to and even beyond his acquittal by the Court of Appeal in 1983," the report said.
“Marshall was one of 13 children of Caroline and Donald Marshall Sr., once the grand chief of the Mi 'kmaq nation. Following his exoneration, he became known as a "reluctant hero" to the First Nation for his role in fighting for native rights".
Then in 1999/09/17 Marshall was charged with three offences set out in the federal fishery regulations: the selling of eels without a licence, fishing without a licence and fishing during the close season with illegal nets. He then admitted he had caught and sold 463 pounds of eels without a licence and with a prohibited net. The Crown lawyer argues that the appeal judge made several errors in the
Abdulrahman Zeitoun and Mumia Abu Jamal were two names I did not know. These two men have both undergone hardships and were both wrongly accused of crimes not committed. The comparison of these cases is hard due to the fact that Zeitoun’s case was not any type of legal and did not follow any type of normal or legal judicial proceedings. Jamal’s case however did follow judicial proceedings “legally”. The first case to point out was the fact that both of these men are innocent in my eyes.
“On July 30, 1992, an innocent person was convicted of a heinous crime”. Guy Paul Morin, an ordinary man, was arrested, imprisoned and convicted of first degree murder. The victim was Christine Jessop, a nine-year-old girl from Ontario, Canada. She was found murdered in a field about fifty kilometres from where she lived. Due to the investigation team’s carelessness and tunnel vision, the systematic failure of the justice system, and the poor handling of evidence by the crown there was not only one, but two victims in this case.
Justice Cromwell and Chief Justice McLachlin perceived this case through a distinctive approach as compared to the majority. As an alternative of viewing the trial as a whole, they decided to concentrate on the functions of the jury which include, representing the community, presenting a protective barrier against unfair/harsh laws, and performing as informative means of the criminal justice system (Pinder, 2015). Without these factors, the trial would be deemed as unfair as the jury is viewed as the foundation of the trial and every matter follows accordingly (2015 SCC 28, para. 24). Cromwell and McLachlin stated the only means of exactly determining if the province abided by section 11(d) of the Charter is to evaluate the Province’s conduct considering the situation and how they tried to recognize the problem – if any. The Justices concluded there was an appropriate link relating the Province’s manner and the absence of diverse representation of the jury as stated in the Charter (Pinder,
Manufacturing Guilt Wrongful Convictions in Canada, follows the theme of the first edition where the authors demonstrate what leads to wrongful conviction. We all know that innocent mistakes happen however, wrongful convictions are usually the result of deliberate actions of those working in the criminal justice system and not unintended errors. By using Canadian cases as miscarriages of justice, the authors argues that understanding wrongful convictions and how to prevent them is incomplete outside the broader societal context in which they occur, particularly regarding racial and social inequality. This book also analyzes how forensic science is used as a resource for prosecutors rather than seeking the truth. What is miscarriage of justice?
Both men were successful in their appeals as a verdict of guilty could not be settled upon as the case was based on improbabilities and circumstantial evidence that could not lead to a definite
The crown appealed on the acquittal of the first degree murder charges, as the error in the charge to the jury had influence the jury to find him “not guilty”. Additionally, the crown stated that the initial trial should have included the remaining twenty murder chargers and not just the six. The Crown also argued that the judge should have included dismemberment and disposal of the victims' remains as being deliberate and planned during his charge to the jury. The Defense also appealed the case on the error in the charge of the jury, requesting a retrial claiming the trial judge had not been precise enough in his charge. The British Colombia Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge’s decision saying that the errors were not serious enough to cause a change in the outcome.
The United States of America has been a long-standing symbol of liberty; the pledge of allegiance even states “with liberty, and justice for all.” However, digging not-so-deep into America’s government and justice system reveals anything but liberty or justice. Luckily, there are many people out there willing to push to reform the system and help those who have been treated unfairly. Bryan Stevenson is one of those people, and his anecdote about Walter McMillian intends to show the deep rooted problems in the justice system, as well as the fairly easy solutions to make strides towards repairing it and the people who have been wronged by it. He does this by using a somber tone about the life of McMillian, as well as using a hopeful one when
Due process is complicated and often misunderstood legal concept, especially as it applies to criminal law. Due process rights are established through the fifth amendment. Due process protection were extended to the states through the fourteenth amendment. The fifth amendment states that" no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law".
Working closely with people placed on death row, incarcerated children and many others; Bryan Stevenson is able to provide some clarity as to how unjust the criminal justice system truly is. Mr. Stevenson graduated from Harvard University Law School and is currently a Professor of Law at the New York University of Law. He is the founder and Executive Director of Equal Justice Initiative, with the help of his team he has been able to successfully “relief or release over 115 wrongly condemned prisoners on death row.” As well as establishing “life-without-parole sentences for all children 17 or younger are constitutional” through various cases handled by the United States Supreme Court. The cruelest of acts are those committed under the false
It can be argued that the jury was not a proper representation of his peers. Along with other factual errors surrounding Dixon’s false conviction,
In the formal criminal justice process, there are important decision makers that decide whether to keep the offender in the system or dismiss the suspect with no future consequences. Suppose a law was set in place
What is the “Due Process?” The due process is a fair Treatment through the normal Judicial system, especially as a citizen’s entitlement It respect all legal rights that are balances the power of law of land and protects the individual person. What does it do?
Today in America we have a crime problem that has been around for generations. Governments in each states spends an enormous amount of money for prisons, police salaries, courthouse and etc. just to try to keep up with the growing amount of law offenders that we have today. Whether we, the citizens like it or not we are exposed with violent behavior from the movies we watch to the music we listen to. Watching the evening news and the top headline news is about the “Orlando Shooting” suspect kills 49 (CNN.com) you are already exposed to violence.
There are three components that make up the criminal justice system – the police, courts, and correctional facilities – they all work together in order to protect individuals and their rights as a citizen of society to live without the fear of becoming the victim of a crime. Crime, simply put is when a person violates criminal law; the criminal justice system is society’s way of implementing social control. When all three components of the criminal justice work together, it functions almost perfectly. For a person to enter the criminal justice system, the process must begin with the law enforcement.
Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher Name Academic Institution Author Note Class Professor Date TABLE OFCONTENTS1 CASE/OFFENDER 3 OFFENSE/CRIME 4 MOTIVATIONS/BACKGROUND 4 THEORY 5 VICTIMS 6 COSTS 7 ADJUDICATION/DISPOSITION (PROSECUTION/SENTENCING) 7 CONCLUSION 8 REFERENCES 10 Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher