Ethics In The Criminal Justice System

The principle in law that one is innocent until proven guilty has created much discourse. There are those who feel that the moment that one is arrested, there is reasonable belief that they committed the crime. However, there are those who feel that just as the principle states, one is, and should be taken as a victim and the outcome could be either way: guilty or not guilty. In fact, this argument is supported by the many cases of malicious prosecutions and mistaken identities.

However, although Rachel’s argument is influential, what makes it weak is that the evil intentions of Smith and Jones do not directly correlate to the two forms of euthanasia. In the Smith and Jones case, they both intended harm to their cousin to gain a large inheritance. For this reason, because they were both morally wrong, there is no moral difference between the cases. Also, just because one fails to prevent the death of someone else does not mean that they have the same moral intention an active killer. For example, failure to prevent someone’s death could be due to inaccessibility or ignorance.

In contrast, opposing evidence suggests that such a bias would essentially break our justice system. While both sides of the issue have valid points, the claim that victim rights should not trump criminal rights is the strongest position, the position supported by the preponderance of the evidence cited in the passages. The most convincing and forceful reasons in support of this position are that the Bill of Rights protects people accused of crimes, such a stance presumes guilt, and the accused has much more at stake than the victim. Accordingly, these reasons and opposing viewpoints will be discussed next.

It is also extremely difficult to get a well-paying job in order to pay for housing, healthcare, and food. The lack of healthcare, food stamps, and well-paying jobs can result in people turning towards crime because of issues such as mental health, physical health, and employment options. One reason that people turn to crime is because of the lack of healthcare. Even when healthcare is available to people, a large portion of them are not able to

Here, the primary focus is on the offender. The two components that social control agencies do is punish and treat the convicted felons. Ultimately, these agencies were created to help, but the effect of creating this involvement is rather harmful. Patrons of this perspective believe that justice agencies should lessen their engagement with the criminal. Noninterventionists also disapprove of the labels that agencies and society gives the offender.

Without proper education, the young adults do not receive the prospect of a bright future like those living in privileged neighborhoods do. Instead, the undereducated urban youth are led down the path of stealing, violence, substance abuse, and eventually, drug trading. Later on in life, El Barrio drug dealers discover that they do not have the cultural capital to gain legitimate work. Cultural capital in the workplace entails types of knowledge and education, skills, and any advantages one has—such as family or friendly connections—to improve their societal status. In In Search of Respect, Primo learns of his unawareness of professional propriety.

In Douglas B. Weiss and Doris L. MacKenzie’s article “A Global Perspective on Incarceration: How an International Focus Can Help the United States Reconsider Its Incarceration Rates”, they write, “Many suggest that the incarceration rate in the United States is so high because it experiences higher crime rates... While violent crime rates in the United States are high relative to these other nations, they do not appear to be exceptional. (Weiss, MacKenzie 271)” Yes, we have higher crime rates, but looking back again, a lot of the criminals that are imprisoned are either committing a nonviolent crime, or a very low leveled crime; hence the “they do not appear to be

One reason for this is more money is spent on the U.S. correctional system than the US educational system. The U.S. also has a rise in extreme incarceration conditions while simultaneously having decreasing availability of rehabilitation services (Bobo & Thompson, 227). When both educational and rehabilitation services are not readily available, this contributes to crime and arrest rates, and increases overall recidivism rates. Another factor is the U.S. has what is known as a ‘Mass Incarceration’ society. The effects of having a society such as this are high incarceration rates far above like societies, and “the social concentration of imprisonment effects” (Bobo & Thompson, 227).

Poverty’s effects on crime can be explained through a variety of reasons. There is a higher rate of mental illness among the poor than the rich. Poverty can lead to high levels of stress, which in turn drive individuals to commit theft, robbery or other violent acts. Moreover, poverty may lead to actual or perceived inferior education. Youth with less access to quality schools, jobs, and role models and opportunities end up spending time on the streets associating with gangs.

Unemployment will drive someone to commit crimes as they are unable to afford their daily expenses. People who are unemployed tend to perform more on property crimes such as burglary than violence crime. The higher crime rate will cause local and foreign investors alike to think twice on investing their capital in the country and thus create recession in the national economy. The diagram below shows that the relationship between unemployment and crime rate in Malaysia. Furthermore, unemployment may affect one’s mental health indirectly.

While many criminal justice policies are loosely based on criminological theories if at all. The lack of consideration for criminological theories could come from the reluctance of scholars to test out the implications of theories on policy. In addition policymakers may simply be unfamiliar with crime theories and therefore have no theoretical knowledge to inform polices. Programs that lack theoretical support are more likely to fail, proving that many criminal justice policies are unlikely to be effective due to poor conceptualization. Even polices that are grounded in theory often are not well supported or are difficult to implement.

1. There is no agreed upon definition of restorative justice. a. Within the criminal justice community, there has been no consensus on exactly how restorative justice should be defined. As a result, there is also some confusion within the community on whether or not restorative justice should be viewed as an outcome or a process (Daly, 2015) b. Because there is no agreement on the definition, there are multiple definitions. This can also result/create theoretical and policy confusion.

Another limitation of this map is that it doesn’t tell you what kind of crime that was committed. It doesn 't tell you if it was extremely violent or not. It would be important to know because there is a difference between people losing their valuables versus people losing

In 2016, Los Angeles County saw an increase in homeless people by 5.7% from 2015, according to the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. Unless something is done about this, the number of homeless people will only continue to keep growing. It is time to stop this pattern. Because of gentrification and other economic factors, it is becoming more difficult for low-income and working class people to find affordable housing.

What Makes a Criminal Defense Lawyer Ideal for You? There are times when we commit faults consciously or unconsciously or other times we are at a certain place at the wrong time, and whichever the case, being on the wrong side of the law has its consequences. When you have been accused of doing something wrong, particularly when the matter has been presented to a court of law, you must seek the services of a lawyer. Criminal lawyers are necessary for your case and can help you in respect to your circumstance.