Three-Fifths Compromise

817 Words4 Pages
The United States Constitution, which shows law, rule and power, was ratified in 1787. In this professional document there have mention one important concept that is slave. However it did not completely resolve the slavery issue. In the flowing paragraphs, I will explain the ways in which the Constitution did and did not respond slavery and give the answer about in the Constitution why did the founding fathers not outlaw slavery completely. Although the Three-Fifths Compromise responded the issue of slavery, there was no words like slavery or slave appear. This settlement was formed during the constitutional convention and in the Great Compromise that concerned the character of representation in Congress. Because the southern states had huge…show more content…
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was an Act of the United States Congress to give result to the Fugitive Slave Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In this acts, south purposed to assist the recapture and extradition of runaway slaves. In addition, they intended to make federal government giving a pledge to let holding property in slaves be legal. The international slave-trade clause restricted slavery after 20 years. As Waldstreicher illuminated that this clause gave slavery 20 years for wanton trade (2015). Unmistakably, both of two laws did not address slavery because they not only gave slaveholders power to possess slaves as their permanent chattels but also curtailed to pass export duties in slave-grown…show more content…
Because under the capitalist system, the slave is the private property of the southern slave owners, which is as same as the northern capitalists’ private property like land, machinery. Thus, both of them should not be violated because they are sacred; therefore, the abolition of slavery is a contravention action. The reason is that slave was regarded as a chattel rather than treated as a man. In conclusion, Constitution did respond slavery through the three-fifths clause, slave-trade clause and fugitive slave clause. Furthermore, the founding fathers not outlaw slavery totally, primarily because it based on financial, political and capitalist
Open Document