Election day to some people is extremely important, while to others it is just another day. This is impart due to one’s opinion on how democratic the elections truly are and if our voting matters. Some people doubt that using a electoral college is truly representing the people. As one explores the process more, it becomes evident that other factors such as the media and the campaigning staff, have equal if not more influence on who gets elected. In Joe Klein’s novel, Primary Colors, the reader is allowed to experience what being in a presidential campaign is truly like and what these candidates act like behind closed doors. While some readers may become even more cynical due to this book, it also shows how regardless of the imperfection …show more content…
Through many people’s personal experience living in a democratic republic and their continued education on the subject, one can begin to wonder just how democratic it is. As one learns how much fore sight is put into each sentence and movement of the politician, one wonders whether or not the whole person and their beliefs are fabricated as well. How can it truly be a democratic election if the people do not even know the true candidates? However, as the character Jack Stanton states in regard to the practices of politicians, “The stuff we do, the craft of it, has developed very slowly and logically over time… you don’t wrench the art of politics away from its roots…” (pg 422- 423). It becomes clear to the reader why these acts of deceit are necessary while Jack Stanton is conversing with Fred Picker. They discuss how the people want a perfect politician, someone who inspires them and can lead the country well. However, people are not perfect in the slightest, the only thing they can do is to have a perfect public image. While this book has shown how many of the candidates are possibly immoral, it also carries hope with it as some people, like Jack Stanton, really want to help the people. However, regardless of the politician 's intentions, the process itself is put into a non-democratic light by Joe …show more content…
Before being nominated for the party as a whole, each candidate had to fight for the position. This lead to the candidates and other politicians in the party to try to manipulate each other or criticize the other publically. We see this with the interaction between Jack Stanton and Lawrence Harris. As Jack states on page 297, “If we can’t build me up… we are going to tear that motherfucker down. I am going to break his fucking back,” (Klein). Many of the candidates feel the same way about the others and wouldn’t hesitate to attack Stanton. This is seen with Charlie Martin when he states in a debate that Jack Stanton is not moral enough to be president. Rather than focusing on who has the best solutions for the country, they try to drag each other through the dirt. Henry Burton and Olivia Holden refuse to let the Stantons use incriminating information about Picker because it would be immoral and Picker seemed to be not in the race for the fame. However, while Picker’s actions seemed anti-political since he openly discussed issues with Stanton without trying to best him, in reality he was in the race for less moral reasons than Stanton. It is no wonder that the interaction with the political party is negative due to the elitism found in the
In the seventh and final event, Schweikart tells of biased news coverage towards the 2008 election. He claims that this unfair new coverage swayed the election to Barack Obama’s favor. The book itself is written very well. The events are in chronological order and all the chapters have a very nice flow.
“Party Games: The Art of Stealing Elections in the Late-Nineteenth-Century United States,” written by Mark Wahlgren Summers, discusses the elements of trickery and manipulation utilized by Democrats, Republican, and Populists during the Gilded Age in efforts to get their party’s candidate(s) into office. As the text points out, “the broad range of party tricks obscured the people’s will, occasionally thwarted it, and cast a moral cloud over the winner’s title” (425). All of these political schemes that the parties in the Gilded Age were privy to, basically made a mockery of the democracy in the United States. Instead of being represented by the people, America was represented by a bunch of scoundrels, also known as politicians.
Mike Scully was one of these cunning political officials he was also the richest man in Packingtown. He used to have control over the elections in the poorer parts of Chicago. Scully was a democrat and he arranged for democratic victories by buying votes, encouraging people to vote multiple times for money. For example in the book it says that Mike Scully would hire men and give them good working hours with good pay so this gave him good friends and everyone saw him as a great man (Sinclair 96). This goes back to the first point which was political system; its people like Scully who corrupt the political system.
This example of the new forms of campaigning is found on page 447 of the text, and it shows how election of presidency made people resort to such unsophisticated manners of winning. New forms of campaigning can also be seen
“A ‘Corrupt Bargain’ or Politics as Usual” (document three) was written by John Quincy Adams during the Election of 1824, after the electoral votes were counted, but before the House of Representatives final decision. It was written to defend himself against the accusations of a corrupt bargain. In these examples it is obvious that voting, while excluding Indians and black Slaves, was open to anyone who wanted to qualify for it. Throught the Corrupt Bargain it seems that Democracy was lacking, because in this case, majority did not rule, which proves that in the following Jacksonian Era Democracy
This is depicted when the states turns red if a state votes for the majority Republican, or the turns blue if the state votes primarily Democratic despite if there is a close margin. Fiorina discusses the uses the illustration to present the false illusion of political division and the influence media has on the public. The strengths in the text are Fiorina’s ability to persuade the audience. The persuasiveness is achieved by relating to the people.
Jackson’s Democratic-Republicans were renamed simply “Democrats”. On the other side were the Whigs who despised Jackson. They came to prominence through a coalescence of Jackson’s enemies: American System supporters, northern industrialists, and the Anti-Masonic, an Anti-Jackson Party. Sectional tensions have, for better or for worse, dramatically shaped the development of political parties in the United States. As a testament to the soundness of these parties, they are still active today in the forms of Democrats and Republicans, very much true in practice to what they were founded for.
By restraining the influence of the government on daily life, the United States will be able to return to the great nation of freedom; a nation in which its founding fathers so vehemently fought to build. Similarly, politics should not be controlled strictly according to political parties, and Coolidge urged people to support the values they believe in, not a certain political party. In today’s world, I think many politicians would benefit from acting in the way of doing the right thing, rather than supporting sides merely based on political affiliation. For this reason, I am passionate about educating myself as much as possible to candidates beliefs, and I look forward to being able to take part in my first elections in coming
For many years, America’s voting system has been criticized, with the main point of interest being the Electoral College. Some say that the Electoral College is necessary to streamline and simplify the voting process, while others say that it is outdated and takes away power from American citizens. After investigating the subject, it is clear that the Electoral College should be abolished due to the three major defects its critics find in the system; its undemocratic nature, its tendency to give small states’ votes too much power, and its disastrous effects on third-party candidates. The first, and possibly largest, defect in the Electoral College is its undemocratic nature. A professor of political science once said that “the Electoral College violates political equality” (Edwards 453).
The United States currently faces a severe problem with one of their governmental processes. In the democratic system of the United States, politicians are elected by voting from the citizens, in most cases. The problem the United States is facing is that people are no longer voting in elections for officials. This problem is discussed in the article, “In praise of low voter turnout”, written by Charles Krauthammer. The main idea behind this article is that voters are no longer interested in politics, as they were in previous generations.
The Votes that Should Count The United States should abolish the Electoral College, by amending the Constitution, and use the Direct Popular Vote process for presidential elections. Though the U.S. Constitution Article two, section one, clause two states that the appointment of electors belong exclusively to the states (National Conference of State Legislator), it is seemingly pointless to carry out national voting polls of the public if only electoral college votes will hold the count for the next elected president. Every three years around the United States, candidates who decide to run for the seat of presidency begin their campaign to win the votes of Americans, but for what?
Coinage of Gold and Silver was an election circumstance for all parties. Likewise, imperialism and the primary election law were important subjects. The civil service reform, at least from Plunkitt’s opinion, was the greatest concern of all. The primary election law and the civil service reform were devastating to politicians who built their success on favors and “advantages.” Tammany Hall felt attacked by the primary election law and civil service reform.
“The true democracy, living growing and inspiring, puts its faith in the people - faith that the people will not simply elect men who will represent their views ably and faithfully, but will also elect men who will exercise their conscientious judgement - faith that the people will not condemn those whose devotion to principle leads them to unpopular courses, but will reward courage, respect honor, and ultimately recognize right”(Kennedy). As It is
In the short story called, “The American Electoral Process,” Kubic explained to us about why he disagrees with how the Constitution and the Congress take all votes for every single state as well as being unalike in population and size in which he would tell of as
I've noticed that Montag figured out lots with the help of Clarisse that should've been revealed by others earlier on. After Montag questioned the original purpose of firefighters, Beatty admitted it but with misinformation. Clarisse is significant in the novel as a catalyst despite her death. However, her talk of the future show how it would comprise of people with not enough knowledge of the past.