When I read the article of “Donald Trump Says Drugs Are ‘Big Factor’ in Urban Violence”, I wasn’t surprised at all. The article is about Trump addressed the problem that the country have, before talking about energy. Trump said that drugs are the problem that caused violence in our country or city. When he talked about drugs, he is referring it to the incident in Charlotte, NC. In Charlotte, NC, the police officers killed a man and later on, every other black men and woman tried to protest. Donald said that when people protest, it is disturbing people in the community. Protest prevent people from sleeping because something bad could happen. For instance, guns could be fired or some of the protesters could go to people houses and steal things. To me, this article was not as surprised as I thought it would be. I wasn’t surprised because people who used drugs are most likely to do crazy things. Therefore, drugs in the United States is a major problem that caused violence in our country. …show more content…
The article is about how Trump spent his money on trading with Cuba. This was a big issue in 1998. In 1998, the American citizens were not allowed to trade or involve in any of the Caribbean countries, especially Cuba. Cuba is a communist country, therefore capitalist countries should not interfere with Cuba. Trump also threaten one group of Cuba-Americans in Miami before he launched his campaign. I was surprised when I read this article, because first of all, people would want to be the leader will have to be a great influence on people, instead of threatening lives. Also in my perspective, before someone become the leader, they should have as much background check as possible. If we find something that they did in the past that may possibly affect us, we should not let that person be the
Considering and setting ones-self first does not lead countries for the satisfaction of all. Plus the fact the leadership will be minuscule mean nothing, Meanwhile, everyone is going to think they should be on top and rule. This is the same mind set as Equality “[even Equality stated] but we wished not to be a leader, even though it is a great honor. We wished to be a scholar” (25). After the fact, when Equality was breaking the laws of his council he said, “[the] Council of Scholars has said we all know the things which exist and therefore the things which are not known by all do not exist.
Goldman in the article shows small clips of videos and other articles to back up his view on the topics. I believe that instead of political people making a change there causing more violence in the world. In Goldman article of Trump the rhetorical violence that is represented is him targeting Mexicans specifically. As well as Muslims, African Americans,
In a span of seventeen years, from 1980 to 1997, the number of the incarcerated individuals imprisoned due to non-violent drug offenses increased from forty thousand to five hundred thousand (Drugpolicy.org, n.d.). At the start of the decade only 2% of Americans viewed drugs in America as a major issue, but after only nine years, that number grew to an astonishing 64%. The media and politicians contributed to this meteoric rise in such a short time. Television networks and news programs began to cover the negative side effects of drugs that were ignored during the two previous free living decades.
The history of this problem started in the late 1960’s when recreational drug use was on the rise with the middle class in America. From 1968-1969 the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs was founded, studies linked crime
The consumption of drugs have always been a part of society, from tobacco used by the native Americans to the coco leaf used by mayans, people exhibit a tendency to use narcotics. While drugs were used for medicinal purposes risks were still associated with them as they are today. As with most things, narcotics can be harmful, and even dangerous, while drugs do not usually cause a society to collapse, it does have a profound effect on how societies function as in the case of the 1900s. While there were positives to the initial inaction of prohibition it was more detrimental than beneficial.
During the late 1960 to early 1970, New York city struggling with the Drug laws, and so many pressures and negative affect around the whole city. The country filled with gloomy air and everyone looks depressed, it is a really tough time. In the 1971s, American president Richard Nixon announced that drug abuse as the number one enemy in the United states, he started a war on drugs, there was unprecedented in history and this policy still continues today. The drug war was a huge failure, bringing an unexpected and devastating effect. In the United States, nearly 90 percent of treatment-seeking patients who began using heroin in the previous decade were white, this is a big change from racial representation prior to the 1980s.
The drug trade is sometimes the only company or business to work for in extremely impoverished communities and the U.S government is punishing people for working for the only business in their area, and their only way to acquire a stable income. If drugs like marijuana were not so relentlessly hunted by the local police and DEA, the U.S could see a lot of people in these communities turn their illegal drug hustles into legitimate businesses leading to less violence in these communities and less people falling victim to a system meant to protect them like Dennis. Michelle Alexander further proves the disproportionate effect the War on Drugs has had on black communities when she compares numbers between pre-slavery America and the current America she sees when she looks around. Michelle has a Law degree from Stanford and has served for several years as director of the Racial Justice Project. She proves her prowess and knowledge in the subject of racial disparity in the United states when she states “More African American men are in prison or jail, on probation or parole than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before
Essentially, although drugs have been held accountable for gang violence and other acts of violence that have occurred within communities, the illegality of drugs indeed may have aggravated the situation. In addition, it has become evident that one of the primary objectives of the war on drugs, which is to limit supply and demand, has been largely ineffective. CSDP (2007) “ According to the United Nations, profits in illegal drugs are so inflated that three-quarters of all drug shipments would have
Alexander was rushing to catch a bus to work one morning and saw this bright orange poster on a pole that was encouraging people to join in on a community meeting titled: "The Drug War Is The New Jim Crow. " She dismissed it as a silly claim mainly because as a successful black woman with a well-paying job as an attorney living in a nice neighborhood she had no reason to believe these things were still an issue. I believed she showed a lot of arrogance here and believed she thought she was better than everyone else. But once she went onto further research, Alexander came to grasp the concept and realized how the War on Drugs was blamed more on black and brown people and how secluded the middle and upper class were from the terrors of the lives poor people dealt with living in the city.
In the name of fighting drug abuse, governments unleashed a war on drugs that continues to rage today. Drugs have numerous negative consequences that can result from an addiction, but some can have positive effects when used appropriately and under the care of a healthcare professional. The War on Drugs is a government-led initiative aimed at stopping illegal drug use, distribution, and trade by issuing increased prison sentences for drug-related offenses, and it increased federal funding for drug-control agencies and treatment efforts. Instead, it has resulted in a disproportionate amount of incarcerations of minorities.
In his article, “Toward a Policy on Drugs,” Elliot Currie discusses “the magnitude and severity of our drug crisis” (para. 21), and how “no other country has anything resembling the American drug problem” (para. 21). The best way to describe America’s drug problem is that it is a hole continuously digs itself deeper. America’s drug issues were likely comparable to other country’s at one point in time, but today it can be blamed on the “street cultures” (para. 21) that continue to use and spread the use of illegal drugs. These street cultures transcend the common stereotype of drug users, such as low income communities in cities or welfare recipients, and can be found in every economic class and location. They are groups of people who have
The use of narcotics like cocaine, claimed many lives and earned widespread coverage by media and news. Following this Nancy Reagan began the “War on Drugs”, a campaign to combat pre-existing drug usage and prevent future
If drugs were legal in the Untied States and people were educated on their affects, the drug world would eventually eradicate
He does not set out to be a leader, but becomes one by the equality of his actions and the integrity of his intent" (McCarther 2015). A leader should lead from the front and also have the ability to think quickly on their feet and take care of their Soldiers. Have faith and trust that the leadership is doing their best to keep everything in
The U.S. leads all nations in opioid usage. Another 8 million use cocaine in the U.S. this number is 3rd overall across all nations. These statistics have lead me and many others to believe the war on drugs is anything besides a success. Opposing views claim, that the war on drugs has been rather successful.