The supposition is that by knowing a sex offender resides in your community, the community can take steps to prevent being victimised. One of the reasons that communities want to know where sex offenders reside is that it may assist the community to “feel better”, however there is no empirical evidence that public safety is actually increased, and if anything, community notification is more likely to instil fear in
Dealing with sexual offenders is not always an easy task to do. Many of the times, the offender will either cooperate or not cooperate. That being said, ATSA has set up a list of regulations that employees should considered. The one I thought were interesting was the fact that motivation inside of the facility and outside is crucial when it comes to the overall treatment of the offender (“ATSA Practice Guidelines and Ethics Order Form,” 2015). If, for example, the treatment is neglectful from the inside of the facility and no support is given by those at home, there’s a high chance that the offender will become an habitual criminal.
It is extremely important to understand that physical evidence from a crime scene does not define someone as a person. Because of the inability of judges, police, and lawyers to fully understand motives of criminals, forensic psychologists are increasingly called upon in recent years (Wachtel). The wellbeing of society is calling; will you pick up the
In such cases, it is immaterial whether the attacker has committed a serious felony, a misdemeanor, or any crime at all” (Katzenbach et al., 1967). Although this appears to be a sound example of a good policy set forth in the report, it is too opened ended and appears to go against other detailed guidelines that the report states, such as the outlines that specifically say when a weapon can and cannot be used. As we know, many times the usage of a firearm is unwarranted by police (Katzenbach et al., 1967) therefore, can the idea stated above, which outlines that police are supposed to make a choice about what kind of force they should make, undoubtedly in the heat of moment, truly offer protection if we know that the decision often made is unwarranted? Through the Report’s guideline no one can be safe because of the variation and differing degrees of safety that it
All sex offender are required to wear a satellite monitoring devices to locate their location. It has been establishing by the law that once a sex-offender is release from prison that he or she will have to be monitor for the rest of their lives. However, the sex-offender register is in place for the safety of the offender and the community. Because of the nature of this crime, it is untreatable due to a mindset that only the offender can free themselves from when they allow a therapy to help. I am not concerned with a drug dealer or murder because a drug dealer can not focus themselves upon a person unless that person has a desire for the drug and a murder may have committed their crime in order to protect themselves or they lost themselves
According to sex offender statics, sex offenders are kept off of these grounds because this helps reduce the temptation or recidivism rates of that offenders to possible reoffend, due to this statement has been a huge argument, because people say if a sex offender want to offend they will do it anyway. These restrictions of dwelling also bring up argument with recidivism, because it forces the offenders to leave in place where jobs might not be as enrich, treatment may not be available closely, or makes it hard for law enforcement officials to get to. Baltimore county has sex
Addressing this issue causes a huge debate due to stigmas. Many believe that any convicted criminal should be set away from society. This is due to the stigma that anyone convicted is a “delinquent” or is “crooked, evil, or a possible murderer.” But, it is quite naive to believe that prisons should be set separate from society. It is crucial that services are provided inside those walls to aid the inmates whom-with a few exceptions- will be released and it is our job and in our interest to ensure that they will not return to crime and be locked up yet again. Assisting them would be to not lock up people for pretty silly crimes, to relieve the problem of overcrowding, to not believe that a person of a darker skin tone is more likely to commit a violent crime, to as a whole support non violent offenders to turn around their life during their sentence and be released ready to start over and be welcomed back with open arms instead of silenced whispers and icy stares, to rid these prisons of industrialization and profit and encourage rehabilitation, rejuvenation, and
I agree with you that poor training for officer contribute a major part in this situation. The low offender classification result in pairing Garrido with a non-seasoned officer. However, there was clearly visible signs such as information that Garrido had violated his parole, feedback from neighbors, and presence of a 12 year old female during a home visit should have warranted a deeper investigation from the officer. These noticeable signs does not need a seasoned officer to question Garrido actions. Furthermore, regardless of what profession a person have, they are usually paired with a proctor to help him or her learned the basics of the job prior to becoming independent.
As he spends more time at the North Hills Group Home and the rehabilitation centers it is helping Reef not to fall back into his original habits. The quote “Once a criminal, always a criminal” should not be used as they characterize all law breakers, reminding us that certain individuals can learn from their mistakes, reconsidering that criminals can change. A change in lifestyle can affect criminals attitude & mind in a positive way. At the beginning, Reef was sentenced to North Hills Group Home. Reef was limited on such things like his constant swearing and being able to go
America has a strict law, which protects our citizens from predators; sex offender registries are exemplifications. In the article “Protect Yourself, Family From Sex Offenders,” Rick Schneider argues that sex offender’s name should not be taken off even after they had served their time. Many can argue that registries are a good way for the government authorities to keep track, and to protect the community from any violence caused by sex offenders. For example, many people may believe the registry protects people from predators because it allows others to know where the predators are and how likely they are to strike again. On the other hand, some people consider that it is “horribly unfair” to release the names and addresses of offenders that
While watching the news, NBC Connecticut was investigating why a Waterbury police officer was fired, it was found that he was connected to a sex trafficking operation. This was an ironic finding as aren’t police officers and law enforcement supposed to enforce the law and not endorse sex trafficking?Trust in the system and government is something that comes at great cost, many people say that conspiracies and cover ups are kept secret by the government to keep anyone from exposing them. The knowledge of how a police officer in our own backyard was fired as connected to sex trafficking is something that needs to be resolved