Genetic analysis should be used freely in society, but only to help those who actually need it. The movie advocates the rules of your genetic makeup which leads to certain opportunities being presented to certain people with higher pedigrees than other. If a person's genetic makeup is sub-par you are unable to obtain your goals in life. While this is not true in the real world it could become a possibility in the future. The movie gives evidence of how your genetic makeup could affect who you love, what jobs you get, and expose you to certain discriminations in your life.
When Vincent Freeman, a striving astronaut wanted to get into the program to work for Gattaca, a space organization, his DNA told him otherwise. Vincent was not born by genetic
…show more content…
When Irene, a women who worked alongside Jerome in gattaca started falling for his she decided to sequence his DNA from a strand of hair hidden away in his desk. The results were what she expected, a “9.5, quite a catch”. It amazed me how easily she learned about his genetic makeup. While screening your potential significant other may help in regards to future offspring, it does not leave much to the imagination. In the movie you could fix all the mistakes in your future children with genetic selection, so why screen your potential partner? Before you even go on a first date you could make assumptions and would not get to fall in love with the person they actually are.
Gattaca, in my opinion endorses and goes against society's will to use genetic analysis. To elaborate further, as stated in the previous paragraphs Gattaca seems to show genetic analysis as a way to make decisions about certain people's life choices. But it also shows how people can struggle in contradictory events involving genetic testing, as put into examples in the previous statements. Gattaca shows many times that genetic testing can be beneficial and has completely taken over society but at the same time provides many hardships like discrimination against certain ranks of
I agree. In some cases, knowing that you have a mutation and will be affected with the disease could be very emotional for an individual. One never knows how they will respond to the result and pretesting counseling may not fully prepare the individual for the result. One question that has been raised is should genetic counseling be allowed for diseases that are not treatable? It is thought that if an individual knows they will develop a condition that has no treatment it could cause psychological harm, stigmatization, and possible discrimination.
Through bio-technology parents choose the genes of their children and attempt to replace the creators design. D’Souza quotes leading techno-utopian Lee Silver who states, “The human mind is much more than the genes that brought it into existence” (D’Souza, 2010, para. 17). In changing the child’s genetics, bio-technology changes the child’s entire future existence. The parents determine the traits the child will exhibit and their capabilities. However, the human mind is vast and expands beyond the limitations of the genes which brought it into being.
The Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering also show that genetic engineering can lead to overpopulation and wars. First of all, in Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., everyone is the same and they have strict laws. In Harrison Bergeron, people are made to be the same by putting weights on strong people, making beautiful people wear ugly masks, and hindering smart people’s thoughts. In Jonas’ community, there is Sameness, which is making everything the
It is never ethical for patients to be intimidated or forced into undergoing certain testing. I believe it is the patient’s decision whether to undergo genetic testing and be informed of the results. In my opinion, a lack of genetic counselors compromises the ethics of genetic testing as patients are more vulnerable to being pressured into doing tests or receiving results they never wished to receive. Therefore, I believe genetic testing is done in a more ethical way when genetic counselors are available as counselors operate by listening to patient requests, only providing information of testing he/she wishes to undergo, and only presenting and helping patients understand the requested results. Even the author of Proverbs 11:14 (English Standard Version) points out the ethical importance of counselors by declaring, “[w]here there is no guidance, a people falls, but in an abundance of counselors there is safety.”
The plot of the movie Gattact begins “in the not-too-distant-future where, genetic engineering in humans is common and DNA determines a person's social class, Vincent is conceived and born without the aid of this technology.” Vincent Freeman, the lead character, is fighting the physical deterioration of a congenital heart problem, and a short life expectancy is emanate. The only way he can achieve his lifelong dream of going to space, is to break the law and claim the identity of a "valid" person with the appropriate genetic code. Jerome Morrow, a famous swimmer had a nearly perfect genetic profile. Despite his physical abilities he attempted to commit suicide, yet he still lived and became paralyzed from the waist down.
Learning about vaccinations and their correlations this past week reminded me of a high school class I had long ago. There was a unit on eugenetics in the eighth grade where my teacher Mr. Howk showed us the movie Gattaca. Gattaca exists in a fictional world where parents can choose what traits they want their children to have and scientists can alter the zygote so that can happen. Mr. Howk explained that this would be the greatest thing scientists could achieve, if this were to become real. “We could get rid of mental and physical disorders while children are still in the womb!
Throughout the ages of mankind, asking questions about their future and the world is normal. Whether it 's what causes a person to have certain traits, or why a banana has Potassium in it. When scientists discovered hereditary and genes, it led to the discovery of altering DNA, and how could change our society. Genetic Engineering is modifying the genetic material in foods and organisms. Genetic Engineering is beneficial and should be encouraged in all countries.
DNA was the only thing that contributed to a little girl's death one friday night, when she collapsed from a heart attack suddenly. The doctor said it was simply in her genes, but what does that really mean? Certain mutations and differences can transpire in someone's genes which causes particular genetic diseases and variances to occur. By taking samples of a person's DNA, which is what our genes consist of, doctors can determine mutations in genes that can impact specific traits and illnesses. While this is very intriguing to me, I wanted to understand how accurate genetic testing is, and how it affects people's everyday lives.
The article is “When DNA Is Not Destiny” by Sharon Begley appeared in the Newsweek on December 1, 2008. Begley is a professional science writer who was born in the United States and graduated from Yale University, where she received her Bachelor of Arts degree in 1977. The article discussed whether people should consist the belief of personality is immutable and decided by the genes that we born with. In the article, Begley begins by refuting Wilde’s argument that personality traits are decided at birth and plays a main role throughout one’s life that is constant and unchangeable.
These are advantages to having a society like GATTACA. It would be fairly easy to find people based on DNA if we used their methods of getting a drop of blood or a hair strand. It would allows to accurately determine which person is which. Another thing is having a more structural and built society even though many people would have less than others there will be a stable place where
Considering a society in which myopia or obesity are direct signs of imperfect chromosomes, and lead to a path of discrimination, Gattaca underlines the importance of physical perfection as a necessity to survive in the futuristic world. Juxtaposing this with societal values in the 1990s, the obsession with physical perfection is still prevalent with the availability of plastic surgery, hair and makeup salons and protein powders and slimming pills, all to allowing individuals to achieve societies idea of perfection and thereby become a successful member and role model in society. Considering Eugene, who was engineered to be the ‘perfect human’, a “9.7, (…) a catch” yet he achieves only second place in his swimming race, showing Niccol’s belief that success is not guaranteed through DNA, imposing the idea that someone may always be better, faster and
Gattaca is a science fiction movie that was released in 1997, the author is Andrew Niccole it is set in a future world where people's genetic makeup determines their social status and job opportunities. The story takes place in the near future, where genetic engineering has become a widespread practice. Vincent Freeman, a man with inferior genes, dreams of traveling to space, but his genetic makeup prevents him from being accepted into the prestigious Gattaca Aerospace Corporation. Vincent assumes the identity of a genetically superior man named Jerome Morrow, with the help of Jerome's DNA samples and a forged identity. Vincent's plan is put in jeopardy when the director of the Gattaca Corporation is murdered, and the investigators start to
M6D1 Ethics and Genetic Testing As we all can agree, our genes play a highly important role in making us who we are as humans. If the information produce by genes is normal than everything can turn out normal and infants can be born healthy. There are those incidents the genetic information produce by genes is wrong and results of this information can lead to injury, disease, and/or illness of the fetus (Munson, 2012).
Fukuyama brings up topics that can be split into two categories: risks and benefits of genetic engineering along with the affordability of genetic engineering. Considering scientists aren’t entirely sure how genes work, they bring about several ills they wouldn’t be aware of, whether they be immediate ills or ills that show up much later (Fukuyama, 678). Genetic Engineering could have horrific effects on a population which could lead to the abandoning of genetic modification, just like in the way that hydroelectricity is no longer used as much because of the potential of dam breaks or environmental effects (Fukuyama, 680). There is also a possibility that only the rich will have access to this technology, so the state would possibly have to intervene to fix this inequality (Fukuyama, 680). Fukuyama concludes his writing by posing the fact that no matter what happens with genetic engineering, genetic engineering will change the course of human history on several levels, and on levels greater than that of any human biotechnology (Fukuyama, 681).
Some argue that it is against Christianity. Nonetheless, holy books does not have an explicitly written text about genetic screening. The arguments are only constructed from implications of the holy texts. As the holy texts might hold many different meanings, who can know for sure, if genetic screening is just or unjust way? As this topic is very complicated dilemma and needs a further debates to come to a common consensus, one should consider two outcomes: when it is morally accepted and when it is condemned as unethical thing to do.