Essay On Greek And Roman Architecture

913 Words4 Pages

The architecture of the Greeks and Romans shared many similarities including temples and structures that were created by either civilization; that made both the Greek and the Roman architecture have a stronger connection. Whether it’s a Roman or Greek structure, both styles of the structures didn’t remain the same as when it was first formed. In fact, it developed by evolving through stages, until it reached to what we can see through the ruins today.

The Roman architecture was so close to that of the Greeks but the Romans also diverged to create their own architectural uniqueness. The term Basilica refers to the function of a building as that of a meeting hall. It was usually located in the form of a Roman town. The basilica is a Latin word derived from the …show more content…

The function of a basilica is also close to that of the Greek stoa, while there were no basilicas before the Roman era. The most famous basilicas were the Basilica Porcia in Rome and Basilica Aemilia in the Roman Forum. In Roman architecture, The basilicas were known to be rectangular buildings in which it 's length is about two or three times the width; and an apse would be added at either one or both ends. The rectangular base was split into aisles by columns and typically covered with a wooden roof. Windows were installed above the central aisle, which allowed light to penetrate inside the structure. Those windows became known as clerestory windows. Greek and Roman architecture varied widely when it comes to building materials. As Romans constructed out of brick and concrete and used marble for columns and ornate pieces of the structure. They also preferred using arches, which gave the structure much more beauty than the simple post-and-lintel system. Romans mostly used the Corinthian style which had a flat roof, unlike the ionic and Doric styles which were at a slant. The preference of Romans in the use of Corinthian columns can be seen in one of the most

Open Document