Challenges arise at some point in everyone 's lives, but the choices a person makes may be more difficult then the challenge itself. What makes a good leader? Sophocles, a greek author, wrote “Oedipus the King” and provides an example of an inadequate leader. It starts off describing the fate of the child of the king and queen of Thebes. To prevent their fate, they give to their child to a shepherd with instructions to let it die on the mountain. The shepherd does not let the child die and the boy grows up in a different kingdom. Eventually he returned home not knowing that he is the son of the king of Thebes. He solved the riddle of the sphinx and was quickly named the king of Thebes. Have his previous actions proved that he was a good leader? The answer can be seen through his impulsive actions, when he stopped thinking about his people, and when he was mercilessly searching for the killer of the previous king. As seen in the following quote Oedipus jumps to conclusions. “You are a clever speaker . . . I have found …show more content…
One cannot deny that Oedipus wanted to find the killer of Laius, and he did everything in his power to do so. That is where the problem lies. Although many believe Oedipus is relentlessly searching for the previous king’s killer, he is actually harming others in order to confirm his fate and wrongdoings. For instance, “One of you twist his arms behind his back quickly!”(Sophocles 85). “You are a dead man if I have to ask you again.”(Sophocles 87) is another prime example of Oedipus’s impudence. Oedipus is very close to figuring out who the killer is, and it shows his inability to show restraint. These quotes also show that Oedipus is willing to kill in order to find out the truth. This is when the audience should question his morality and justification. He was doing whatever he wanted, and no one stopped him. As a result, it can be seen that Oedipus is not fit to be the ruler of
In like manner, Oedipus also lacks the qualities of a good leader when he argues with Creon; “‘But yet/I must be ruler. ’/‘Not if you rule badly. ’/‘O, city, city!’/‘I too have some share/in the city; it is not yours alone. ’”(Sophocles, ln. 732-737)
In conclusion, Oedipus had a very rough life. He tried to be good and everything he did he thought was for the city of Thebes. However, he did some horrible things in the process of trying to be a good leader. The question is, does his ignorance and meaning well
This is illustrated through Oedipus’ blindness throughout the play. Oedipus is angered by the accusations that he killed King Laius. Instead of confronting the problem and rationally coming to the truth, he lashes out in
Oedipus learns that you can’t control everything in life and also things come and go, they never stay. So instead seeing the truth and believing the lies, it’s best to see the lies and believe in the truth. Otherwise
Oedipus Rex essay Final draft Oedipus certainly deserved his fate. Oedipus and his actions are clearly disrespect to the gods , he faces the fate he deserves. He was doing things that would eventually lead up to the unfortunate event of his death , he was even warned by the great and wise Teiresias , but he being himself was to stubborn and did not listen. All the things Teiresias said would happen became the truth. He killed his father, married his mother, yet he tempted his fate , he deserved everything that came his way .
The king felt that the gods words were untrue and his fate was something that he could prevent, but he really couldn’t. He was a very conceited and arrogant man, who felt that he was the gods gift to the earth. He even said “I Oedipus whom all men call the Great.” This was a very haughty statement on his part. As well as his arrogance, he also acted quite invincible, or as though he will never be defeated.
The Blindness Of Oedipus vs The Sight of Teiresias In Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, Oedipus wishes to avenge his city by finding and exiling the killer of the former king, Laios’s killer. Oedipus asks Teiresias who the killer was, or at least for a hint in the right direction. At first, Teiresias refused to tell him but after Oedipus insisted, he finally relented. Teiresias was a blind man but knew that Oedipus was actually the murderer, while the king’s arrogance blinded him from seeing the truth.
Therefore, he will have to punish himself as he promised the people of the town. When Oedipus learns that he is the one who killed Laius, he is angry and unaccepting. He turns to blame the person closest to him, Creon, but, Tiresias says, “Creon is not your enemy. You are your own” (Episode 1).
Background Information: In Oedipus the King, by Sophocles, Oedipus was told that he would kill his father Laius and marry his mother Jocasta. However, Oedipus doesn’t believe that he killed Laius but was blind to the truth for him accept it which led to his demise. 3.Thesis Statement:
Introduction The story of Oedipus the king is gloomy, yet captivating. Going from a child bond around the feet and abandon by the mountainside, to marrying his mother, his story is intriguing. In search of the truth about the prophecy and putting an end to a plague Oedipus, search for king Laius’s killer, did somethings inadvertently, making him a tragic hero. His search for truth in the death of Laius the king, as well as his birth led to the ultimate destruction and downfall of his life.
Niya Kebreab King Oedipus: Moral Ambiguity In the play King Oedipus, Sophocles depicts Oedipus’ inevitable downfall, which represents man’s struggle between free will and fate. In an attempt to use the audience’s knowledge to his advantage, Sophocles opens the play seventeen years after Oedipus murders his father, Laius and marries his mother, Jocasta. The sequence in which the story unravels reveals the strong psychological focus towards Oedipus’ character. In search of his identity, Oedipus’ enigmatic quality and moral ambiguity compels readers to question whether his ignorance renders him morally blameless.
Oedipus stubbornness led him to losing his friend Ceron and making the gods mad. He also did not listen to Tiresias's when he foreshadowed
Every character in stories or in plays has their flaws and strengths; Oedipus is no exception to this. Oedipus has his strengths and weaknesses that shape him into the character he is perceived to be in the play. He is intellectual which is why the city looks up to him, he is caring, and tenacious. Like any other character Oedipus also has his flaws, he jumps to conclusions and makes rash decisions, he has anger issues, and hubris which eventually leads to his downfall. Intelligence is something that is highly respected in individuals, especially in leaders.
Now if that stranger and Laios were” (Sophocles, 43). We are very quick to view things through our own eyes, but we often forget that many norms, things that are so ingrained in our heads, change with time. As bad as it could sound, Oedipus’ actions were not uncommon at the time. Men were constantly trying to prove themselves, something that still happens today but not in as physical of a way, so fighting, that could sometimes lead to death, was not that uncommon. Oedipus was unaware that the man was of royalty, and frankly, even if Oedipus did know, Oedipus was royal himself.
So in the end, Oedipus no longer thinks of himself. Thinking of his children 's impending marriage, Oedipus begs for his children and no longer can think of himself as anything more than a creature that embodies what it means to be pathetic: “When you come to the age ripe for marriage, who will he be who will run the risk, children, to take for himself the reproaches that will be banes for my parents and offspring alike? What evil is absent? Your father slew his father; he ploughed his mother, where he himself was sown, and he sired you in the same fount where he himself was sired.