Ethical Definition Essay

915 Words4 Pages

The German philosopher Immanuel Kant 1724-1804 stated: "So, act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as a means only. This Kant’s second version of his Categorical Imperative it means we should never use a person as a tool or puppet to achieve our objectives. Humans have free will to choose how to live their lives, to make laws governing morality. Only people could judge value and value items in our environment, therefore, individuals have value. Every person should be a valued part of a society. No one person is worth or have more importance than another is the moral standard. It is important for everyone is treated with dignity because only humans are rational agents. …show more content…

One must ascertain if the action is suitable for development into or become a maxim or universal law that can apply to everyone in a community. If the universal law could apply to everyone in the same situation with no changing or the maxim. These maxims where required to apply out with no deviation, no thoughts of circumstances or other considerations. Decisions made do not require our emotions, traditions, religions, authority, and happiness. Nor a person’s desires or intuition. Ethical maxims were the product of our sound, rational insights, using logic. We would know our maxims to be great truths and see them as moral duties. To know if our Universal laws were moral we only need to measure or test them using Kant’s categorical imperative. We start by stating the issue and the possible solution. Teachers in middle and high school are constantly asking students to stop talking and playing on their cell phones. The students’ ring tones when receiving text messages or phone calls takes away from the time the teacher spends teaching in her class. Teachers are catching students using their phones to cheat on the tests information

Open Document