ipl-logo

Evolution Of The Supreme Court Between 1953 And 2003

563 Words3 Pages

In the past, certain principles of the Supreme Court in accordance with the Fourth Amendment changed with each Chief Justice. Between the years 1953 and 2005, there had been three of them, each modifying the main focus and making exceptions to searches and seizures by police. Their names were Chief Justice Earl Warren, Warren E. Burger, and William H Rehnquist. With each alternation of each of them came the names referring to the Supreme Court for those time periods. First, the Warren Court, focused on bringing attention to the exclusionary rule in order to protect citizens from being charged with ilegally-obtained evidence. The principles established in the Burger and Rehnquist Courts made exceptions to this rule, and didn't enforce it quite as much. The Burger and Rehnquist Courts' principles reversed aspects of the original principles of the Warren Court, which enforced Induvidual Rights within the Fourth Amendment. …show more content…

In this period, the Fourth Amendment was strongly upheld along with the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule is made so that police couldn't use any illegally-obtained evidence to convict a defendant. Chief Justice Earl Warren brought the exclusionary rule from local to state-level in the court case of Mapp v. Ohio. In this case, officers forced their way into a home without a search warrant because they suspected Dollree Mapp of hiding an alleged bomber, where they collected evidence so they could use it against him in court. The exclusionary rule was enforced, making none of the evidence found applicable to be used against Mapp in court. The principles of the Warren Court focused mainly on Induvidual Rights within the Fourth

Show More
Related

  • What Is The Case Of Mcculloch Vs Maryland 1819

    3094 Words  | 13 Pages

    Opinion: The opinion for this case was 6-3 upholding to Mapp. She used the First Amendment rights for her case during court. However, Mapps also used the Fourth Amendment to the U.S Constitution saying that because it was an unfair search and seizure. Her house was her privacy and they were unfairly trespassing. 10.

    Read More

  • Maryland Vs Pringle Case Study

    476 Words  | 2 Pages

    The majority explained that the Fourth Amendment, as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, allows for officers to arrests without a warrant where officers have probable cause to believe a suspect has committed a crime in the presence of the officer. In this case, the officers undoubtedly concluded that a felony had been committed, and the question for the Court was if the officers had sufficient probable cause to believe that Pringle had committed a crime. According to Chief Justice Rehnquist, that question was a fact dependent investigation as to whether circumstances allowed officers to conclude not only that a crime was committed but to have specific suspicion of Pringle. In the written opinion Justice Rehnquist stated that three men riding in a car where drugs are found, with all three suspects denying possession, affords officers probable cause to conclude that one or all have committed a crime. The Court rejected Pringle’s assertion that the probable cause in this case amounted to “guilt by association,” distinguishing this case from others in which searches of groups had been limited.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Chief Justice By Ed Cray

    766 Words  | 4 Pages

    Freelance writer and professor Ed Cray presents a thorough recount of Chief Justice Earl Warren’s political and personal life in Chief Justice: A Biography of Earl Warren. Warren first enters the scene as a district attorney and later, the attorney general of California. The second chapter, then, focuses on Warren’s role as the 30th governor of California and the 1948 Republican vice presidential nominee. Finally, the final chapters emphasize his role as a Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, and chair of the Warren Commission. Warren’s involvement in the political scene warrants this comprehensive 700-page biography.

    Read More

  • Justice Hugo Black's Rise To The Supreme Court

    240 Words  | 1 Pages

    Justice Hugo Black was a United States senator for 10 years and served one of the longest terms in Supreme Court history with thirty four years and one month in the court. As a senator, he was a strong supporter of President’s Roosevelt’s New Deal reformation, therefore leading to his nomination to the Supreme Court in 1937. Justice Black’s rise to the Supreme Court was met with outrage and controversy from the public and the media due to his previous affiliation with the Ku Klux Klan and consequently tainted his reputation nearly costing him his seat in the Supreme Court. However, he was also an advocate for rights of racial equality and a defender of the constitutional rights of the accused. His literal interpretation of the Constitution

    Read More

  • Judicial Branch Research Paper

    946 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Constitution was originally divided into seven articles. The first article in the Constitution grants the Legislative Branch its powers along with its limitations. It states that the Legislative Branch- also known as Congress- is divided into two houses: the House of Representatives, and the Senate. Congress has the authority to manage money by taxing, borrowing money, and regulating trade. Additionally, other important powers Congress incorporates is the authority to raise armies and preserving the navy.

    Read More

  • US Supreme Court Of Law: The Exclusionary Rule

    81 Words  | 1 Pages

    The exclusionary rule is “based on U.S. Supreme Court precedent, that incriminating information must be seized according to constitutional specifications of due process or it will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial.” This corresponds with the fourth amendment because it protects us from unreasonable search and seizure from police. So, if police would find something incriminating evidence during an unreasonable search and seizure, it would not go through in the court of law hence the word “Exclusionary rule.”

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Motives Of The Federalists

    787 Words  | 4 Pages

    They didn’t leave out the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court; the wanted the jurisdictions to be limited. There effective argument was the absence of a bill of rights in the

    Read More

  • Supreme Court's Abuse Of Power

    325 Words  | 2 Pages

    The author feels the Supreme court is a bad idea because they think it will lead to abuse of power and the Supreme Court will take over the government because there wasn’t a system of checks to limit its power yet. The author shows this view when they say “In the exercise of this power they will not be subordinate to, but above the legislature . . . The supreme court then has a right, independent of the legislature, to give a construction to the constitution and every part of it, and there is no power provided in this system to correct their construction or do it away.” (Antifederalist 79) This shows he thinks the Supreme Court will have the power to bend the constitution to its whim.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Strategic Auditing In A Political Hierarchy

    1184 Words  | 5 Pages

    Game theory tries to prove that the justices will act strategically when trying to grant writs according to their ideology. In “Strategic Auditing in a political Hierarchy”, Cameron, Segal, and Songer are specifically looking at search and seizure cases from 1972 to 1986, and the writs that were granted by Supreme Court. The study could not account for the district court, but it could account for the circuit and supreme court. In the judicial common space, doctrinal compliance occurs when the lower court conforms to doctrine set by the higher court.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Roles And Powers Essay

    440 Words  | 2 Pages

    How Roles and Power Evolved Over Time Roles and powers of the U.S. Supreme Court has evolved since the founding period. You may hear things like is that what the Founding Fathers might have wanted or that not what they wanted for us. However, there is no real ideal of what our Founding Fathers really wanted for America. Roles and powers has changed during time by methods of constitutional interpretation and the way courts promote both the common good and individual liberty. The Constitutional interpretation is when the judiciary uses methods and strategies to interpret the law.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Justice Argumentative Analysis

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    The unexpected passing of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia immediately set lawyers and politicians talking about who would get the nod from President Barack Obama to fill Scalia 's slot. However, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell 's vow to not confirm any nominee during the remainder of Obama 's term creates an awkward dynamic around any potential pick. Story Continued Below Whoever is nominated will have to consider the possibility of being in limbo for a year or more, if the Senate fails to act during the election year. However, that person might also have a leg up on being nominated by Hillary Clinton, if she wins the nomination and the general election in November.

    Read More

  • Mapp Vs Ohio Case Study

    1872 Words  | 8 Pages

    41. Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Supreme Court ruling that decided that the fourth amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be extended to the states. If there is no probable cause or search warrant issued legally, the evidence found unconstitutionally will be inadmissible in the courtroom and not even considered when pressing charges. The exclusionary rule, in this case, is a right that will restrict the states and not just the federal government, including the states in more of the federal rights as outlined in the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    The exclusionary rule is a lawful principle that the United States use, which expresses that the confirmation that was powerfully utilized by the police can 't be utilized in a criminal trial. The motivation behind why this is done it’s for the security of the established rights. In addition, the exclusionary rule states that in the Fifth Amendment no one "should be denied of life, freedom, or property without due procedure of law." The exclusionary rule additionally expresses that in the Fourth Amendment it is intended to shield residents from unlawful pursuits and seizures. It also applies to the infringement of the Sixth Amendment, which ensures the privilege to counsel.

    Read More

  • Advantages Of The Exclusionary Rule

    313 Words  | 2 Pages

    The exclusionary rule was made to protect people 's rights and ensure justice in court but there are exceptions. One exception to the exclusionary rule is inevitable discovery. The law of inevitable discovery states that even if evidence is obtained illegally, it can still be used against someone in court if the evidence was bound to be found one way or another. For example, if the police were searching for a fugitive and broke into someone 's house without a search warrant because they believed the criminal was inside the house, and find the criminal they can still arrest him because sooner or later they would of gotten a warrant to go inside the house they suspected him to be in. If the police have to go inside someone 's home to find an

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Issues

    1158 Words  | 5 Pages

    The United States Supreme Court is the highest judge on the most important issues that our country faces involving the constitution. These judgements are entrusted to nine men and women who, once appointed, can remain in their positions for as long as they live. There is no other Supreme Court in the world that permits their justices to serve for life (Morrison np). The high court officials of most other countries serve for fixed term lengths or are required to retire at a certain age (Morrison np). It appears that much has changed since the inception of the United States Supreme Court in 1787; and life tenure no longer seems to be the most appropriate approach.

    Read More

More about Evolution Of The Supreme Court Between 1953 And 2003

Open Document