Explain How The Constitution Guarded Against Tyranny

617 Words3 Pages

The Constitution guarded against tyranny due to the principles of government and the Great Compromise. This argument will be proven by Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and the NJ and VA plans. Federalism guarded against tyranny by making sure the state and central governments can check each other to ensure neither government has total control. In Federalist Papers #51, Madison states, “the different government will each control each other, that at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” Our government, being split into three branches, controls each other and makes sure that one branch won’t be able to gain more power. That keeps one from taking over the entire government and causing issues. Federalism …show more content…

It made sure large states couldn’t be controlled by the small minority. In the Constitution of the United States of America, it states, “representatives… shall be apportioned... according to… population.” It shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand. (Constitution of the United States) Back in 1788, the larger states were happier with their representation in the House. They had more population and where entitled to more reps. The representation in the Senate made the small states happier because each state was given the same amount. It ensured all states had equal say. The most important document, written in 1788, guarded against the possibility of an individual or group from getting too much power. Four main subjects: Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and the Great Compromise, may have proven that the Constitution did, indeed, guard us against tyranny. The Constitution did exactly what they wanted it to do; it protected against the U.S. from having a tyranny. If the Constitution wasn’t made, we would end up with a

Open Document