The Ninth Amendment states: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be constructed or deny or disparage others retained by the people” (Bill of Rights). This amendment was made to protect people’s rights. Including things like marriage, abortion, slavery, and police conduct. However, this modification has been compromised several times in the past and the present.
It can be hard to find your political view. Sometimes it takes time and research on political issues in our country and around the world. There are two popular political views; conservative and liberal. The definition for a conservative; is holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion. Liberal definition is; open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values. My political view is in between conservative and liberal, moderate.
Obergefell v Hodges first originated when same-sex couples sued the state governments of Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee in disagreement to the constitutionality of those states ' bans on same-sex marriage and refusal to recognize any legal marriages that took place outside the jurisdiction of the state. The couples argued the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was violated by the state 's’ exclusion of same-sex marriages. In the trial courts of the fourth, seventh, ninth, and tenth districts, state level bans on same-sex marriage were declared
This is and was the main problem with Federalism, as the state government could for instance set a tax, which is not forbidden by the Constitution, but comes into conflict with Congress’s authority to tax. What transpires is a system of essentially an overlapping authority in which the national government has a certain amount of authority over the nation as a whole, while the state governments have powers not limited to national government, but the Constitution. “The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government with power over issues of national concern, while the state governments, generally, have jurisdiction over issues of domestic concern” (Cornell, n.d, para.
Wouldn 't it be wonderful to live in a perfect world? Well it 's not one. This world has this history that is not perfect. There were wars, flames and much more, but the worst of all would have to be racism and the inequality we had just because the color of one 's skin. In the past, we have done things to people that were not fair or right just because their skin was different. They would have two different water fountains, for white people and one for black people. There were as well two different schools and restaurants for black and white. The Supreme Court has impacted many people 's decisions : Shelly vs. kraemer, brown vs. bored of education, loving vs. Virginia.
It's easy to get angry and/or violent protests confused with civil disobedience. Many overlook the effectiveness of civil disobedience and see it as just another way to protest the government but civil disobedience has a long history. A few examples of civil disobedience include Rosa Parks’ famous refusal to move from the back of the bus in 1955; the interracial marriage between Richard and Mildred Loving in 1958; and most recently, the protest against the Dakota Access pipeline construction. In each instance, people stood up for what they thought was just and right.
Federalism is the different types of principle that the government enforce law to ensure the safety for citizen and non citizens. Paragraph 2 of the Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally the supremacy clause can also overtake the state laws and even state constitutions. The founding fathers decide to use federalism as a way to control the people and their actions, they believed that governmental power inevitably poses as a threat to individual citizens for life and liberty because some states may abuse their power so the government decide to make laws to prevent states from taking too much power. only the federal government can intervene with
time period segregation and discrimination were still a hefty part of the social standards of
Today in history, the United States still obeys the Constitution. As everyone knows, it took bravery, courage, and bloodshed for the U.S. to keep and have this document. It took a great mind and a lot of trial and error to create the perfect form of government that was right and fair to all the people. However, the Constitution was not the “first Constitution” for America, the Articles of Confederation were. The Constitution surpasses the Articles of Confederation because of its policies, the reasons for the change, and what the writers did.
Introduction -" I would like to be remembered as a person who wanted to be free... Therefore other people would be also free" is a quote said by a strong independent women, who caught for rights. The civil rights issue big part of history were two types of people were different and discriminated. The Supreme Court has helped to establish equal rights for all people: Dred Scott v. Sanford , Plessy v. Ferguson , Loving v. Virginia.
This mixed government kept power to the people and prevented the central government from becoming too powerful. In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments [state and federal]. The states had their own reserved powers while the federal government had the delegated ones (Doc A). The shared powers of the two were called concurrent powers. Through these, state sovereignty, or power to the people, was maintained and both powers could even tax and make laws. One of the most significant pieces of the constitution is the Bill of Rights, or the first ten amendments. These describe the everyday basic rights of the people in which the federal government can not intervene. By putting these in place the creators of the constitution ensured that the people would always have their rights and there was no chance of the government taking them away, just as had happened with England. Federalism is not the only example of separation of
The vast power of the federal government has been on the rise, crippling the state’s authority. In the early 1800’s there have been cases where the Supreme Court has ruled, for the most part, in the federal government’s benefit. With the Legislative and Judicial Branches making up 2/3 of the federal government’s power, many could speculate the two powers are working to strengthen the federal government. However, the ruling was based off of Necessary and Proper Clause, where it is said that Congress (Legislative Branch) has the authority “to find the great powers, to lay and collect taxes; to borrow money; to regulate commerce; and to declare and conduct a war.” When the states interfere it causes the Judicial Branch to step in and decide what
The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments in the Constitution. In modern day, some of these amendments are considered to be out of date, or need to be improved. These amendments are used all the time in normal life, and in the evolution of America.
Imagine meeting that perfect person and falling in love, but because of the person 's skin color, you cannot marry them. This is true for Mildred and Richard Loving. They went to Washington D.C. to get married because they knew it was legal there, and when returning to your home to Virginia they were arrested and put in jail. They were arrested because Richard was caucasian and Mildred was African American. They met when they were young and began a relationship; when Mildred became pregnant at 18, they decided to get married. It was 1958 at that time and illegal for people of different races to marry each other in the state of Virginia. Richard and Mildred pled guilty to violating state law. The judge banished both Richard and Mildred for twenty-five
Article IV provides that "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities in the several states." The purpose of the clause was to facilitate the unification of the independent states into one