Pros And Cons Of Federalism

Checks and Balances Secondly, the separation of power provides a system of shared powers or checks and balances. By that I mean, that each branch has the power to limit or check the other two. The Constitution gave the most checks to Congress or the legislature. They did this because the framers did not want the president to gain enough power to become a tyrant. A few legislative checks include; the ability to impeach the president or judges, override a presidential veto, pass laws to overthrow supreme court decisions, and propose amendments to the Constitution.

When writing the Constitution the founding father really tried hard to guard against tyranny by using Federalism, three branches, their powers, and that all states have a say in congress. James Madison was a smart man, he knew that if you give all power to one person or a small group it would go to their heads. So he proposed a compound government, long story short it was incorporated in the Constitution. The compound government meant that their would be two parts of the government. One part would go towards the country as a whole, the other was more focused on the smaller issues such as each individual state.

The first guard against tyranny was federalism. Federalism is a system of government which calls for a strong national government, but still leaves power in the hands of the individual states. In Document A James Madison states, “in the compound republic of America, the power surrendered

By writing a new constitution, the farmers were able to address the problems which the nation faced under the Articles of Confederation. The most important issues were addressed by the establishment of a stronger national government that was selected by the citizens. Unlike the Articles of Confederation, were each state maintain its own sovereign rule, each state was represented equally in Congress through the representatives elected by its citizen. Therefore, power was no longer placed in a single institution such as the states or one overall governing body, but rather in the hands of the people. This government had the power to tax, regulate trade and commerce, and coin a national currency with a majority vote versus a unanimous vote.

In the scope of government, this style of leadership can be referred to as statesmanship. In Federalist 70, Publius calls for a strong executive in order to provide the robust energy needed to maintain the republic. A strong executive can prioritize the country itself over the law of the country, thus going against popular and accepted opinion to do what is best for the country. This behavior of putting the country’s needs over the desires of the public is the key aspect in the statesmanship style of leadership. Furthermore, the statesman is more focused on the long-term impacts that their decisions will make on the institution rather than the immediate satisfaction of the public because the well-being and longevity of the institution is prioritized over what the public desires.

Nixon bestowed his thought on how power should be shared between the state and federal government. It conveyed powers that were previously the federal governments sent it back to the state level. Federal government implies block grants to the states that rectify social issues. Some powers were ejected from the state level allowing the states to regain authority. The new system proposed more money, directed problems with poverty and solved problems instead of creating them between states and local governments.

Constitution DBQ Annalyn McCay The constitution guards against Tyranny in many ways. A tyranny is usually referred to as a person or a group of people that has a lot of power on their hands or having complete control. The constitution guards the U.S. from tyranny by dividing power between the U.S. government and the state governments, it also distribute power between the three branches of government, the Constitution also guards the U.S. from tyranny by having equal representation from all the states. The constitution guards against Tyranny in many ways. The constitution guards America from tyranny by dividing powers in between the state governments and the U.S. government.

Americans in general view America as an ideal democracy in which every citizen has a voice and the views of the public have the power to shape the country. It is somewhat ironic, then, that the Constitutional Convention as a whole was mistrustful of democracy. Perhaps the most prominent holder of this opinion was James Madison, who was very vocal about the oppressive results of majority rule. Madison was of the opinion that the best way to ensure liberty was not leave it in the hands of the general public, but rather to split the federal government and allow each of the resulting branches curtail the power of the others. As Madison said in Federalist No.

Its purpose was to give the public more power in the government. This Act lets the people of America implore Congress to publicize documents from the government, and it was to detain the government from holding important, secret documents ("Restraining the Imperial”). Congress passed a law whose goal was to check the power of the president. The US Attorney 's General had always had the authority to prosecute high officials if they performed any illegal activity. It restricted reasons on which the President could

The British had a Monarchy on them. After they won their independence, they set a Democracy government and Federalism (weak and strong central government power shared), almost all the contrary to how British Monarchy worked. This is important because this shows why the United States broke away from Great Britain and set a new government very different to Great Britain 's type of