It is the reason as to why Canada is united with all the provinces and territories, that the British and French have established throughout history. On July 1 1867, the British colonies of Canada, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia united into one Dominion of Canada. This development created independence from Britain, as well as a bilingual government and preservation of the French culture. “The combination of protectionist US trade policy, fears of American aggression and expansion, and Britain's increasing reluctance to maintain the expense of defending British North America, fueled the idea of uniting the BNA colonies in a single country.”(Canadian Encyclopedia). The idea of Confederation was partly inspired by the fear of the United States invading, and the lack of defense British North America had.
After the American Revolution, the Americans were finally able to break away from British rule. They knew they needed to create a government and with that, the Articles of Confederation were born. However, the Articles gave the states too much power and gave almost none to the federal government. The Founders scrapped the Articles and created a new document, the Constitution, which gave more power the federal government than the state governments. In spite of this, not everyone was happy about the new Constitution.
Consequently, British national identity is created through complex relationships with people and places. These relations have played a crucial role in establishing Britishness throughout history. In the past, the country's identity was determined by its 'colonial wealth (and power) of ‘Empire’' (Clarke, 2009, p.234). Other places stood in opposition to this nation, that viewed itself as superior, and its identity drew on racial characterisation of 'British Whites'. Thus, British identity was imagined as stemming from similarity and a common descent (Weber, (1978 ).
Even though the confederation only lasted from 1781-1789, it was still seen to be valuable with its belief that sovereignty belongs to every state. After the Confederation ended in 1789, the U.S. Constitution took place bringing the states together as a whole. While these two documents have the needs of the nation in mind, they both do have quite a bit of a difference as well. The Articles of the Confederation was the first form of government created by the Continental Congress, which developed an alliance between the thirteen states. Congress was a single-chamber legislature which allowed for each state to possess the same amount of authority no matter the size of the community.
I believe everyone wants to know where they came from, to better learn who they are. We in the western civilized world would never accept going back an absolut monarchy, which is a form of dictatorship , still in use in many countries in the middle east and afrika.But a modern constitutional monarchy could be a qualitative evolution for our present liberal , 100% quantitative, only political democracies. Having the king for president,although with less executive power , would be a qualitative change, and might bring back important values like our history, our traditios, what we always stood for...like we have the flag and sing the national anthom. There has to be something right and good about a modern democratic monarchy. Spain, Belgium, The United Kingdom, Holland,Denmark, Sweden, Norway ,are examples of the best countries in the world to live- highest levels of happiness, standard of living, culture, health security and life expectation.
Although, the creators of the Constitution were influenced by many previous documents the most influential documents were the Articles of Confederation, the English Bill of Rights, and the Magna Carta. These documents limited state power, allowed for government criticism, and protected citizen’s individual rights. The failure of the Articles of Confederation created the desire of a stronger federal government and limited state power. The Articles allowed the states to raise
A charter is a document, issued by a sovereign or state, outlining the conditions under which a corporation, colony, city, or other corporate body is organized. This meant the British Government had no direct control of the company; they just informed them of how to properly organize themselves, and by doing this they also approved of the creation the company and allowed them the right of passage to the East Indies. At first the British East India Company had no power in the trade around India specifically the Indian Ocean and the East Indies. The British were regarded by some as the “weaklings” of that time, specifically the Dutch. But it should be known that the British were the only formal company at this time in the area until the Dutch East India Company was organized shortly after when it was chartered in 1602 by the current State General of Netherlands at that time.
Furthermore, we must understand here that the Confederation was created with 13 colonies coming together and forming central government. But it was believed that all of the 13 colonies would get equal representation in the Congress and all these states were also seeking self-government so they could at least take decisions regarding their internal matters. Regardless, both of these things became impossible. While the states were granted some rights, it was declared in the Constitution that the central government would be allowed to interfere in all important matters and its authority would not be questioned. Such articles in the constitution naturally gave immense powers to the central government, which created a rift between the states and the government.
The United Kingdom is well recognized to have an unwritten constitution, even though, they do not exist in a single text, like other countries such as USA and Malaysia, the huge parts of the so called United Kingdom constitution is actually written down and most of it being statutes. Thus, the UK constitution is often defined as ‘partly written and wholly unmodified.’ This doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty states about the correlation between the Parliament and the courts and which one is the supreme. It has been stated above that the UK is recognized to have parliament supremacy, but to what extent the supremacy is. Dicey said that the parliament is supreme, which it gives a meaning that under the English constitution, there is no person or body is recognized by the law of England as having a right to overrule or set aside the legislation of Parliament as the parliament has the right to make or unmake any law
It means that the organization of the political entities tend to be derived from another nation-state. For example, states such as India, Kenya and Nigeria have had long relationships with the UK, thus they to organize politics in respect to the British system of