Here at the University of Oklahoma, Greek life is a huge part of campus living. Our Greek system has major influence over our students and the atmosphere of the school. Last March, a Fraternity on campus made national news, for a video that was filmed off campus, and not with relations to the university. Was the university at fault for the racist song to be sung and for it to be videoed? Most people would say no, but OU got more backlash for this than the students who created it. David Boren immediately kicked the fraternity off campus and he initiated a plan to prove “not all sooners are racist.” This is where we see the problem and power struggle between Fraternities and Universities lies. All the students in the video were adults and living …show more content…
And even more where is the line between the University protecting their students and protecting their own image when those students make decision that backlash against the school as a whole? Another issue similarly occurred in 2011 when multiple incidents happened at OU leading to a change in campus policy and to put more control on Greek life. The hashtag #FreeOUGreek surfaced from the Greek members saying that there was too much regulation to Greek life. The Interfraternity Council, according to Dillion Cheverere and his relationship with the board, wrote an article saying that, “The #FreeOUGreek movement stems from the Interfraternity Council and Panhellenic regulating and ruling the OU Greeks with an iron fist. They are in full-on crackdown mode right now due to widespread alcohol abuse and sexual abuse allegations” (Cheverere). OU is a dry campus and the University itself made it that way to contain the use of alcohol to off campus activities, which includes Fraternity houses. IFC tries to contain the use of alcohol by threatening the citations and using the “scare tactic”, but without constant reinforcement and regulation, those threats aren’t
By writing “when the ideas, values, and speech of the other side are seen not just as wrong but as willfully aggressive toward innocent victims, it is hard to imagine the kind of mutual respect, negotiation, and compromise that are needed to make politics a positive-sum game”, the authors exhibit their feelings that perceiving differing opinions as aggressive is the wrong viewpoint. Connecting the disputes at college campuses to affecting politics develops a pressing feeling that something needs to change. Many people may view the culture at universities as something that doesn’t affect them or matter, and the writers of this article hope and try to change this outlook by constantly referencing how the increased amount of coddling and protectiveness will poorly affect the future of the students as well as the
Amid recent racial events, protests of students, and the possible boycott by the football team, University of Missouri 's president Tim Wolfe has decided to resign (Svrluga). Tim Wolfe is accused of not "addressing racist and bigoted incidents this academic year, including when the undergraduate student body president was called the n-word, when a white student climbed onto a stage and shouted slurs as a black group rehearsed a skit, and more recently when a swastika was drawn on a wall with human feces" (Svrluga). Even other colleges are chiming in on the issue, saying "the university had 'failed ' its minorities after students rallied on campus with emotional tales of discrimination and insults" (Svrluga). In an effort to ease tensions,
Alpha Phi Gamma Sorority, Incorporated has a strict and disciplinary policy to maintain their privacy. This policy is known as the Code of Secrecy and it is to be followed by every chapter. It is first introduced to any potential new member during the first few meetings and it is to be kept in a potential new member’s burgundy binder that is handed to them. It is about a paragraph in length and does not have to be enunciated word by word. It is located in the Alpha Phi Gamma National Pledge Work Book section of the binder on page six.
Historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) are institutions of higher education in the United States founded primarily for the education of African Americans. Prior to the mid-1960s, HBCUs were virtually the only institutions open to African Americans due to the vast majority of predominantly white institutions prohibiting qualified African Americans from acceptance during the time of segregation. As such, they are institutional products of an era of discrimination and socially constructed racism against African Americans (Joseph, 2013). Successfully, millions of students have been educated in spite of limited resources, public contempt, accreditation violations, and legislative issues. The purpose of this research paper is to discuss
By the 1990s, the college evolved into an institution of indoctrination with unyielding socialist and radical views, predominantly in gender politics. The situation peaked in 1993 after Antioch College’s infamous Sexual Offense Prevention Policy (SOPP) or (SOP) dictated that men would have to ask permission from women during each stage of seduction. The aim of the policy, created by feminist students, was to protect women from violence and rape n campuses. The historical event, created by Womyn of Antioch, was considered to be so bizarre that it received national headlines, and was used in a skit for a Saturday Night Live Television broadcast.
The last month has been, to put it mildly, eventful in American politics. With the at-times hostile protests from leftists at the University of Missouri to GOP presidential frontrunner Donald Trump’s numerous controversial comments, November was marred by outrage from both sides of the spectrum with little room for nonpartisanship. But looking past these individuals, there was a lone bright spot, and it came from someone not known for his politics, but rather his music.
Today’s college students are becoming more sensitized to the harshness of the outside world. Instead of learning to be resilient to others’ comments, they are being taught to take offense to any little word that could in some way be connected with a bad experience they might have had, and college administrators and professors are aiding this childish behavior. They are backing this movement to make adults into children. With this new movement to rid college campuses of any speech that may make anyone feel uncomfortable, students are being treated less like adults, and more like elementary children.
A huge dispute aroused after members of the Alpha Delta fraternity, at Dartmouth College, hosted a "Bloods and Crips" theme party. Members of this fraternity, which are majorily white, dressed up as gang members of two gangs from the South Central Los Angeles area. Aside from dressing up, the members of this party also engaged in racialized language and speech, turning the environment of the themed party into a “ghetto” scene. Although many members of the administration at Dartmouth College condemned this incident as morally wrong, no further action was taken. Even though the members of the fraternity apologized for their wrong acts, students who felt attacked requested others to report this incident as a biased act.
Our situation needs to be used a learning tool so that something that is this horrible will never happen again. As a community, we need to restore the joy that we used to have when mentioning Michigan State. We need own what has happened, we need to be held accountable, and we need to change the culture that we have become accustom too. The victims need to be listened too and not shamed for staying silent out of fear and retaliation. I think that Burke’s appearance on campus progression in our communities effort to talk about the issues regarding sexual assault and how we tackle this issue.
These students had to compete on a level playing field and earn their admission through their own merits. The fact that some students were able to gain admission through fraudulent means undermined the status honor of those universities and value of a degree from these institutions. The scandal exposed the corrupt and unfair practices that were used to gain admission to elite universities, and the parents involved were seen as part of a system that perpetuated inequality and injustice. This criticism and backlash may have undermined the status honor gained by the parents, as their actions were seen as immoral and unethical. The power dynamic in the Varsity
Dangerous traditions: Hazing rituals on campus and university liability. Journal of College and University Law, 26 (3), 511-548. Drout, C. , & Corsoro, C. (2003). Attitudes toward fraternity hazing among fraternity members, sorority members, and non-greek students. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(6), 535-543.
There has been several instances on campus through the history of black student life that has questioned your ability to value our presence. In 1988, the Black Student Union organized a “Day of Outrage Against Racism” that gathered 275 students to protest against racism on Bascom Hill, in response to actions by the fraternity Zeta Beta Tau as they staged a mock slave auction and made pledges blacken their faces and wear Afro wigs. In 2011, there was a mock lynching on Langdon Street. University officials were notified of a life-sized black Spiderman doll that was hung by the neck from the balcony of an apartment building, which depicted lynching.
(Avi, 125) This evidence explains about how the situation gets twisted and turns into more about perspective than the actual reality of it all. The reporters, the school board, and even some faculty, all twist the story. For example, Phillip wasn’t expelled. He was suspended for breaking a rule, not so much as singing the national anthem.
A study done through Journal of American College Health found out that “many students overestimate the amount of alcohol their peers consume, and start drinking to the imaginary drinking level” (Carter). Incidents due to misconceptions are common. According to Bloomberg News “more than 60 people have died in fraternity-related incidents” (Friedman). To avoid problems like this, the Greek life itself or advisors/directors can organize “talk sessions”.
Dorothy Siegel’s argument in the essay “What Is Behind the Growth of Violence on College Campuses?” is persuasive. Siegel persuades the reader by presenting her points and validating them with facts and statistics. One of the strongest aspects of the argument is that contrary to popular belief, students are committing a majority of the crimes that take place on college campuses; the students “themselves may become the assailants”, not persons from outside of the campus. She further supported this by pointing out that students tend to know their attackers. Another strong aspect of her argument is that campus violence is due to substance abuse.