The HHFKA also focused on the kinds of foods accessible in schools. The HHFKA imposed stricter restrictions on the types of food products accepted in schools and advocated for more physical and nutritional education programs (Edwalds, 2013). The HHFKA permitted the USDA to control competitive foods and required more severe nutritional standards for the meals distributed in schools (Edwalds, 2013). Additionally, the HHFKA required the USDA’s nutritional guidelines to be proven by scientific research and be in accordance with the Dietary Guidelines for the U.S. population (Edwalds, 2013). Limited funding has continuously to be a severe problem for the NSLP (Echon, 2014). Subsequently, to get more schools on board to offer more nutritious meals, …show more content…
Also, it lowered the amount of processed foods and sodium in school lunches (Hirschman & Chriqui, 2013). In addition, the number of eligible children registered in school meal programs was raised by about 115,000 children (Hirschman & Chriqui, 2013). The most significant positive outcomes of the HHFKA was the addition of a nutritional education requirements, inclusion of local school wellness policies, and appointment of an official to each educational agency to implement and enforce local wellness policies (Edwalds, …show more content…
in spite of this, it is not effective enough to solve the problem of childhood obesity. On the surface, the restructuring of the NSLP seemed like a great idea. After all, who is against serving healthier food? However, concerns exist regarding if changes can happen in childhood hunger in the U.S. due to these new regulations from the HHFKA. The possible consequences are schools are faced with higher expenses due to these requirements, in response some schools have opted out of the NSL, so they do not need to follow the new rules (Turner & Chaloupka, 2014). Thus, students eligible for the NSLP will not longer have access to free or reduced meals and also, children have expressed their dislike of the new lunch options served through the revised guidelines (Turner & Chaloupka, 2014). In 2012, students at a high school in Kansas made a parody video called “We are Hungry” complaining about lack of energy due to the low calorie meals served at their school for lunch (Yee, 2012). The students argued the HHFKA targets overweight children, which leaves average children feeling fatigued and leaving them hungry (Yee,
Also the websites states the need for plenty of healthy food choices for children instead of cheaper, more calorie-packed alternatives (“Looking for Info?”). This is where federal food programs come into play and can make a difference in children’s lives. Children are dying day after day due to hunger and these food programs can stop that. These federal food programs can keep kids healthy and can make a difference in the future and life they will continue to
The article “The Real Problem With Lunch” written by Bettina Elias Siegel is about the everlasting struggle of replacing unhealthy American public school lunches with better alternatives. She’s reaching out to parents, students, school representatives, and other influential people to change how American society views junk food, in hope that it will affect choices children make about lunches at school. How convincing is Siegel’s argument overall? Although she doesn’t fully address the strides made already by public schools to better their lunches, she strategically balances her use of argumentative tools: pathos, ethos, and logos. She uses statistics, facts, and empathy to urge her point of bettering lunches for children.
The dramatic change in school nutrition standards sparked a need for a food model that matched and was easy for children to
Nicholas Confessore, the author of ”How School Lunch Became the Latest Political Battleground”, displays the challenges of transitioning from the old rules to the new rules as part of Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move!” campaign. It is clear to all parties that childhood obesity is rising at a dangerous rate in America and school lunches are believed to be the necessary first change. Unfortunately, the multiple different parties that are involved in making the changes do not see eye-to-eye. The School Nutrition Association is one of the groups pushing back against the new government policies. Since the SNA is comprised mostly of lunch ladies, they believe the current meals are the healthiest meal most students receive in a given day.
Child Hunger “When the AD council convened focus groups not long ago to help prepare a series of public service announcements on child hunger” In the essay “School’s Out for Summer” Anna Quindlen informs us about child hunger in America because, in America people do not believe this happens in our own country but it does. In this essay, Anna Quindlen, used many examples and scenarios to persuade the reader that, in America, child hunger does exist. Some of the first things Anna talks about in this essay is how during the school year kids will always be about to get a lunch and some even a breakfast because, this is what the school provides for the children. And only 3 million kids are getting a summer lunch program.
Another solution that could be implemented to solve school lunch debt is by providing free meals. By providing free meals to students, they are able to have the exact meals as their peers, parents will not have to worry about finding the funds to pay for school lunches, moreover students are having their nutritional needs met, which is essential to their development. Despite how simple this may sound, this can easily impact local businesses as a result of a decline of how much product that is being sold. According to an article written by Denise-Marie Ordway, “Food purchases decline by an estimated $11 per month, on average, among households with children located in the same zip code as the school offering universal free meals” (Ordway, Section 16). Due to the fact that it wastes food, declines sales in grocery stores, and costs more taxes, this is another solution that is not the best for this particular issue, but can also be used as a potential solution in the
Thus their needs to be policies and programs emplaced to rectify the growing number of foods deserts because it is increasing the rates obesity in America’s population and children. For instance, Michelle Obama has started the Lets move! campaign to bring public attention and create programs to improve children’s nutrition across the nation. It is understood that if the obesity epidemic is not addressed now, America will have to fund numerous obesity and
The Child Nutrition Reauthorization Act (also known as Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act), established in 2010, is a 5-year renewable act that strengthens nutrition levels throughout schools. It imposes new restrictions on certain foods that could lead to childhood obesity across the United States. Since 2010 there have been limitations on milk, whole grain, and sodium. The Child Nutrition Reauthorization Act is constantly working to improve the health and eating habits of millions of public and private school students.
This also shows that the government is only thinking about the children being healthy which is fine, but they also they need to think about how the children feel. Therefore, the government has to think about what the children want and what they want to eat.
It is spending money that we don’t have for a lunch with fruits and vegetables that we just throw away (4)”, students do not want just spend their money on food that is not even the half of the food they used to get in the previous lunch program, counting the price the lunches are higher and students are not happy with it. In addition, some students are choosing to get junk food, because the new federal lunch program do not appetize them “it was kind of ironic that we are downsizing the amount of food to cut down on obesity but kids are going and getting junk food to fill their hunger (6)”, so even if the federal is trying to involve the students to eat healthy, students would always pick the option more accessible for them, and that will fill their
In some schools some principals superintendents have made a decision to opt out of the Healthy choice foods and make there own semi-healthy foods that kids like. To reduce waste and bring back students who have opted to pack a lunch or go off campus for fast food, his districts cafeterias have installed stir-fry stations with abundant vegetables so students can have meals made to order. and he’s added spice bars so kids can even the bland. In schools some principals and administrators are starting to take action.
The media could also give true and important information about nutrition, instead of always promoting entertainment or negative things. The media should support the health of children and adolescents in a positive way. The marketing system could create things that push kids to want to engage in physical activities. Another important factor that is important is eating a balanced meal at least three times a day. This solution is the responsibility of parents and partly the school.
many of us probably can not remember when there was no school lunch We grew up with it and accepted as part of the school every day, but there were times in the history of our nation when school meals were the exception rather than the rule However today's child nutrition programs are present in more than one hundred thousand schools across the nation if you live in Anchorage Alaska or Key West Florida school lunch is available for children What is even more surprising is that the rules and federal nutrition rules They are the same in each of these schools participating in the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program we will see the extraordinary story of how they started and child nutrition programs He grew in
In the lunchroom, the staff has set a STAR goal that 65% of the student’s nutrition education components will demonstrate increased knowledge of healthy eating habits by the end of the ear. The lunchroom staff will offer more healthier lunch choice varieties. The lunchroom will also host a short Healthy Choices trivia game show every to assess knowledge of the
Cafeteria food in schools is made to be healthy for students, but is it really healthy for students if they think it is foul and do not want to eat it? Should schools change the healthy foods to foods that students would actually want to eat? School food’s job is to be healthy and tasty to get the students through their day, but sadly school lunches tend to miss the mark on both accounts. Public schools rely on money from the government to supply food to their students, but due to several cutbacks the thing served in the cafeteria is hardly food at all. We all know the stereotypical school food mystery meat Monday or a slab of grey mush and sadly that is not too far from what it is in reality.