Hfka Should Be Allowed In Schools

1013 Words5 Pages
The HHFKA also focused on the kinds of foods accessible in schools. The HHFKA imposed stricter restrictions on the types of food products accepted in schools and advocated for more physical and nutritional education programs (Edwalds, 2013). The HHFKA permitted the USDA to control competitive foods and required more severe nutritional standards for the meals distributed in schools (Edwalds, 2013). Additionally, the HHFKA required the USDA’s nutritional guidelines to be proven by scientific research and be in accordance with the Dietary Guidelines for the U.S. population (Edwalds, 2013). Limited funding has continuously to be a severe problem for the NSLP (Echon, 2014). Subsequently, to get more schools on board to offer more nutritious meals,…show more content…
Also, it lowered the amount of processed foods and sodium in school lunches (Hirschman & Chriqui, 2013). In addition, the number of eligible children registered in school meal programs was raised by about 115,000 children (Hirschman & Chriqui, 2013). The most significant positive outcomes of the HHFKA was the addition of a nutritional education requirements, inclusion of local school wellness policies, and appointment of an official to each educational agency to implement and enforce local wellness policies (Edwalds,…show more content…
in spite of this, it is not effective enough to solve the problem of childhood obesity. On the surface, the restructuring of the NSLP seemed like a great idea. After all, who is against serving healthier food? However, concerns exist regarding if changes can happen in childhood hunger in the U.S. due to these new regulations from the HHFKA. The possible consequences are schools are faced with higher expenses due to these requirements, in response some schools have opted out of the NSL, so they do not need to follow the new rules (Turner & Chaloupka, 2014). Thus, students eligible for the NSLP will not longer have access to free or reduced meals and also, children have expressed their dislike of the new lunch options served through the revised guidelines (Turner & Chaloupka, 2014). In 2012, students at a high school in Kansas made a parody video called “We are Hungry” complaining about lack of energy due to the low calorie meals served at their school for lunch (Yee, 2012). The students argued the HHFKA targets overweight children, which leaves average children feeling fatigued and leaving them hungry (Yee,
Open Document