When comparing Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson’s stance on foreign and domestic policies, there are similarities and differences. One iconic phrase we associate with Roosevelt, “speak softly and carry a big stick,” justly depicts his stance on foreign policy. Roosevelt sought after prestige for America, desiring to stand out among the nations in power and strength. At times, Roosevelt’s foreign pursuit was aggressive and resulted in conflict such as the Spanish-American War, and resistance to Roosevelt’s Corollary. But it did lead to advances of the construction of the Panama Canal, and the absorption of power over the Philippines, Puerto Rico, Guam, Cuba and Hawaii.
War During the Progressive Movement, Roosevelt and Wilson were the only two to get involved in War. Roosevelt was in the Imperialist state of mind while Wilson was drag into the war. Roosevelt main war as president was Spanish-American War. And Roosevelt portrait the War giving independence to Cuba and Philippines from Spain.
In the twentieth century, the United States political reflected a growing of the idea of the Progressive movement. This fundamental of this movement was the government served people better and the economic reforms. In addition, gained in popularity under two presidents; Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Both of them have different approached in progressive reform. Teddy Roosevelt believed that the federal government should be an active manager for reforms.
Thaddeus Russell, author of A Renegade History of The United States, furthers his book by changing his focus to one specific presidency,Franklin D. Roosevelt’s. Roosevelt strays away from democratic policies and tries to swift the nation into an autocracy. Roosevelt’s presidency was on the verge of dictatorship. Russell continues to explain how this one particular presidents ideas and policies were no longer self-governing, but seemingly a tyranny waiting to arise. The president plans on propaganda and censorship were said to make America great again.
The Progressive Era took place in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, it marked and transformed the United States as well as its government. Many groups were an important part of the process that helped this transformation occur. New concepts of government and changes were made based on those notions. Political reforms took place in every aspect of the government. Roosevelt set the pace for progressive reform at the federal level.
The predecessor of Roosevelt stated, “He criticizes me because I prosecuted the Standard Oil Company and the Tobacco Company through to the Supreme Court and got decrees there.” Both Roosevelt and Taft had well thought out campaigns that eventually morphed into attempts to turn the people
Teddy Roosevelt and the Progressives paved the way for future political activism. In the early 20th century the Progressive movement captured many people because of its benevolent nature. This ideal led to an emphasis on increased government regulation and control, and it transitioned into an almost depression era necessity. This movement is now characterized by President Obama and modern day liberals, who once again emphasize the importance of a strong centralized government on the pretense of benevolence. Although Progressivism is characterized by the urge to help better society, it is often translated into big government and sometimes unneeded regulation.
In “George Washington’s Farewell Address”, Washington addresses the nation as a final farewell as a means of resignation of presidency. Washington leaves the nation with compelling ideas in order for continued success. He discusses that the nation benefits with a federal government, we should eliminate political parties, religion and morality are important, to preserve public credit, to steer clear of foreign alliances, and to avoid overgrown military establishments. In “The Rise of Presidential Power before World War II”, author James T. Patterson discusses the development of presidential powers in America from the 19th to 20th century.
He links the struggles of the Civil War era to the modern day, equating the modern-day “sinister influence” of special interests to that of cotton and slavery (5). An industrialized American economy has given rise to new social and economic demands, he argues, that have challenged not only modern society but also the fabric of American democracy. Roosevelt then describes a series of sweeping reforms intended to rectify this: increased regulation of public corporation, a progressive income tax, labor reform, social security, mandated campaign finance disclosure, and more. The speech, remarkable in its comprehensiveness and conciseness, cloaked such radical progressive ideas in classic American rhetoric, thereby appealing to the audience’s sense of
The Progressive Party or the Bull Moose Party campaigned as much as thirty-eight states, which was more than any of the other opponents. There was many competition with the candidates’ and their opponents. One way Teddy campaigned was by addressing speeches to gain voter’s interest. Earlier on the day, before his speech, Roosevelt came to a stop in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He wore his Army coat and in his pocket, he carried his 50 page speech, which was folded double to fit his inside pocket.
As we entered the 21st century, the presidency became very different from the one created in 1878. The constitution limited the presidency so it wouldn’t become a monarchy. However, the limitations subsided because of the attitudes of the founding fathers, and the next two presidents. Washington, Adams and Jefferson shaped the presidency into more of a positively influenced position in the 1800s. But, from that time until about the 1930s, Congress was the most dominant office in the executive branch.
Progressive era (movement) had three presidents. Theodore (teddy) Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and Woodrow Wilson. Roosevelt reforms were to try to balance the activity of business, consumers, and laborers. He passed the Pure Food and Drug Act. He also used the Sherman Antitrust Act to break up monopolies.
The three presidents that served during the progressive era were able to progress the nation but the one that did the most was Roosevelt this is because of the reforms with big businesses and how Teddy tried to stop the forming of monopolies. The workers union was also benefited by The Presidents reforms which made many feel more safe and sable at the workplace. Lastly, Roosevelt was a big supporter of conservatism and based many of the acts that were passed on these beliefs. Therefore because of all of the efforts put into progressing the country evidence points to Roosevelt being the most progressive president. During the 1900s many big businesses had started to get too much power which allowed them to affect the economy.
President Woodrow Wilson was the last of the Progressive Presidents and as such caused great economic, political and social change. He served between 1913 and 1921 during which he imposed economic change through reforms, both national and international political change and a change in the role of women, giving them the right to vote. The effects of Wilsons presidency created abundant change within American society that had long lasting impacts. Political change was imminent in Wilsons second term as he was given emergency presidential power to, in some cases, bypass Congress, to speed up the law-making process. For example, he imposed the Selective Services Act in 1917 which authorised conscription in the US so that the military could be built up quickly and would not have to rely wholly on volunteers; according to Khan Academy this was well received by the American public as they were incredibly patriotic and believed it was their responsibility to support their nation, as such few men dodged.
In his essay, Woodrow Wilson breaks down his essay into three sections, the first of which gives a detail of the history of public administration. Without delay he concedes that technically public administration has been around for a long time. However, he supersedes this through claiming that no one had studied in depth the field and systematic knowledge of public administration until the previous century. He details of during the period of and preceding his essay, people would disproportionately focus on the constitution of the government. These people would focus on the relationship of the constitution and how the laws were made, what laws could be made, and who made the laws.