It can be argued through popular opinions that nurture has a prominent role in child development, which is highlighted in Walker and Plomin's research article, where teacher's responses were in favour of the environment for behavioural traits such as personality, behavioural problems and mental illness. These results emphasise that a child is greatly influenced by their surroundings as they grow up and undesirable influences such as adverse family situation and lack of recognition of the importance of education can have detrimental impacts on a child's behaviour. Through the twin study it is also suggested that dizygotic twins only share similarities due to developing in the same environment (Walker & Plomin, 2005). For many individuals, there is the popular belief that sharing an environment will generally result in similar development. However, individuals will respond differently even if they share the same environment as their exposure and experience in their surroundings will cause differences in child development (Slee & Shute,
While nurture is most commonly defined as environment and experiences that we have. Although, nature and nurture plays a big role in child development, nurture seems to be a little bit more of an influence on child development than nature. I believe that children learn by experiences that they have. On one side (nature) of this debate; it says that intrinsic influence such as genetics plays a major
The effect of genes is astonishing in our personalities, intelligence and talent. Genes are one of the important factors that shape our personalities. I almost certain that some people would argue that siblings have similar genes yet they have at times
This can shape a person not their Genes and it is proven that experiences can shape a person's. “The nurture theory holds that genetic influence over abstract traits may exist; however, the environmental factors are the real origins of our behavior”-(Sincero). This states that we may have urges because of our genes but we do not have to follow those urges and we ultimately make the decisions not our genes. This is basically saying if their parents are serial killers they might have the urge maybe to kill but if they were treated well as a child by normal people and did not know their parents they wouldn't kill becuase thats not the environment they were shaped in. ” Although it is true that fraternal twins raised apart have remarkable similarities in most respects, still the intervention of the environment have caused several differences in the way they behave.” The twins may look a like and share some similarities but their genes won't affect the decisions they make and this is self evident of proving the point of family influence is one of the biggest influence of a person.
Scientists used to dispute about which was more influential, nature (biology) or nurture (experience and environment). It is not about nature versus nurture but rather both nature and nurture balanced. Biology, including genetic weaknesses and inclinations, may provide the initial argument, but it is the relationships the children have with their caregivers that form the progression of their growth and development. A safe, constructive, and caring environment can affect depression, anxiety, or other mental issues, and even alter these weaknesses into strengths. Using this information, I want to be able to create an environment and atmosphere that is conducive to the positive development of my children.
ny significant instances and events in one’s lifetime that shape their personality and character. As many people know, significant events during childhood can dramatically affect people’s life and surrounding environments later in life. According to NPR, studies show that, “…our early experiences likely affect us to a certain extent. And we know that due to variations in psychological makeup, some people are more sensitive to environmental factors than others” (NPR). This quote introduces the nurture vs. nature theory which shows how both the environment and genes contribute to the outcome of people’s future.
In this case, similarities in upbringing cannot account. This is not to say that genetics account for most or even most of our attitudes formation. On the contrary, evidence suggests that genetics effects are fairly small. Other factors do not strongly determine attitudes. However, in addition a
Psychology is the science which studies about human thinking patterns and behaviors. Psychology has its different approaches where biological approach stands as one of the oldest divisions psychology had. Biological model is one of the main model in psychology also it has being spreading very widely through the frame of psychology and it has now absorbed all the approaches and the biological module is offering explanation to almost all the human behavior. But the real problem occurs when biological approach tries to offer explanation to the abnormal behavior human have because there are many explanation against the biological explanation to the abnormal behavior people had. Biological approach, offers many explanations how the nervous system,
She bases her conclusion primary on biological theories of nature’s influence over the development of children. Children are passive players in their own development. According to Spencer, environment’s role in development is to guide the development of what is already present and transpiring in the child. She bases her opinions upon her experiences with her own
Genetics are influential on our personalities. Some may say that this is not true because there is no gene for personality. But it is believed by others that certain characteristics that create a persons personality are passed down through genes. Genes play an important part in determining personality traits, such as, social skills, self-control, and our learning ability. Some people may say that our environment we grow up in has more to do with our personality than our genetics.