1. What does Telemachus tell Penelope in regards to the news he heard from Menelaus and Nestor in regards to Odysseus? He tells her the little news he received about Odysseus, but doesn’t tell her he meet Odysseus at the swineherd’s hut.
Dramatic irony is used in book 14 to intensify the element of Nostos, by showing how dire Eumaeus’ want for Odysseus to be home is, when Odysseus is present, but not fully returned. His love for his master is so intense that he can not stop thinking about him and his well being. From the emotion, it is evident how much Eumaeus cares about Odysseus. When he says “so deeply he loved me, cared for me” (171), it shows how he felt when he served Odysseus. He refers to Odysseus as an “old friend” (169) displaying his longing and remembrance of companionship with Odysseus. He also says that “I can scarcely bear to say his name aloud” (170) demonstrating how Eumaeus is grieving the loss of not only his master, but his eternal friend. Eumaeus’ expression
In the play King Oedipus, Sophocles depicts Oedipus’ inevitable downfall, which represents man’s struggle between free will and fate. In an attempt to use the audience’s knowledge to his advantage, Sophocles opens the play seventeen years after Oedipus murders his father, Laius and marries his mother, Jocasta. The sequence in which the story unravels reveals the strong psychological focus towards Oedipus’ character. In search of his identity, Oedipus’ enigmatic quality and moral ambiguity compels readers to question whether his ignorance renders him morally blameless. The vagueness about Oedipus’ intellectual state can be interpreted as unconscious knowledge, which may make him morally culpable. Guilty
He is hopelessly pursuing the murderer of the king Laius, when the killer is really him. In the beginning of the story, Oedipus proclaims, “So I will fight for him as if he were my father.” This quote depicts how truly uninformed he is about the situation. Consumed with finding whoever this person is, Oedipus doesn’t stop once to look at all the evidence that points to him. This just adds on to the stressed irony of the Greek tragedy. Oedipus doesn’t think about the issue from an outside view or even question any of his own past doings. As the story unravels, Oedipus slowly but surely begins to realize that he is a possible verdict in the situation. Even after making this conclusion, Oedipus is still fully unaware that he not only killed his biological father, but also married his own mother, who bore him four children. By the time he learns this, it is too late to take any of his actions back. To sum everything up, readers of this Greek tragedy will tend to see a common pattern of events: Oedipus being clueless about his own behavior, Oedipus being presented the evidence of his actions, and lastly, Oedipus recognizing his fundamentally immoral doings.
Throughout both plays, dramatic irony is used to portray the protagonists as tragic heroes and deliver their meanings as a whole. The heroes are not necasarilly aware of these events of dramatic irony, but they are apparent to the audience. One example is when Oedipus refused to believe Teiresias the blind prophet about the truth of his actions and the prophecy. Oedipus called him a “… sightless, witless, senseless, mad old man,” when ironically Oedipus , “with both [his] eyes”, was the one blind to the prophecy and the severity of his actions (Act1. ll 154, 196) . Afterwards when Oedipus’ parenthood was questioned, he had not yet realised or accepted his biological parents as Iocastê and King Laïus, and the truth of his actions towards them. The audience had inferred the truth long before Oedipus, thus giving them a sense of suspense, waiting for the truth to be revealed. This conveys
past. Throughout the play, we notice that Sophocles makes the center of attention Oedipus's family origin, where we can tell that his true identity is still very much so attached to the past. In the forms of dramatic irony, the reader can see that Oedipus displays that he has been living a lie. The boy who didn't know he was adopted, not knowing he killed his own father, and certainly not knowing he was involved in incestuous relations with his own mother.
Throughout the play Oedipus the King by Sophocles, there are many motifs that connect to universal truths, one motif in the play is ignorance. The motif of ignorance can relate to the universal lesson of, truth is not always the best to have because it can harm yourself and others. To start with, Oedipus wants to find out who his mother and father are so he questions a messenger. In the process of this, Jocosta realizes that she is Oedipus’s mother. In addition of her finding out this new information, she cannot live with herself so she commits suicide. Jocosta cries, “Take my advice, I beg you- do not go on with it.” (Sophocles 61) and Oedipus replies, ”Nothing will move me. I will find out the whole truth”(61). Given that, Oedipus does
Imagine living a joyful life of comorbidities with your beautiful wife and children, only to realize one day that everything you knew was a lie. Examining a work of literature such as Oedipus the King, by Sophocles (406B.C) is an extremely difficult to understand, without using resources such as the schools of criticism it would be even harder. Sophocles (406 B.C) writes a play that although at first sigh seems like the unwanted and unavoidable fate of a character. After taking a closer look, it is not fate but instead it is a subconscious desire that ends up fulfilling the prophecy. Using two schools of criticism, physiological and social-historical we will examine a child’s subconscious love for his mother and Oedipus and Jocasta’s subconscious knowledge of the the prophecy. These are the reasons that
In the beginning of the play, the author portrays Oedipus as a proud and arrogant man which causes him to initiate the search for the answer of the mystery. Oedipus is introduced with a problem in his kingdom so he sends “Creon, Jocasta’s brother, to Apollo, to his Pythian temple..[to] learn there by what act..[Oedipus] could save this city” (78-82). Creon reports that the Black Plague will terminate when “the man whom had murdered the previous king of Thebes, Laius,” receives death or banishment (112-113). Oedipus is oblivious to the fact that he is the killer of Laius so he orders his men to begin to probe for clues. He wants to be projected as a king who will go to any extreme for the kingdom’s prosperity. By showing his dedication, his subjects will respect him at a greater level thus giving him immense power over the city. Oedipus summons a prophet,
Euphemism- The replacement of a cuss word or awkward situation with a term that loses its literal meaning in order to hide its original meaning.
Some of the clever and ironic word play Tiresias uses is when he says “How terrible- to see the truth when the truth is only pain to him who sees” (Sophocles 176), “You bear your burdens, I’ll bear mine. It’s better that way” (Sophocles 177), and “ You criticize my temper . . . unaware of the one you live with” (Sophocles 178). In the first quote, Tiresias uses clever word play to show how the truth brings pains to those who see it, just like when Oedipus sees the truth leads down a path of pain and eventually making him become blind. In the second quote, Tiresias use clever word play to show that everyone has something their burdens some that may not know about them, just like the Oedipus had the burden of killing his father. In the third
A person is able to physically see while being blind to the truth of who they are. One of the most prevalent motifs in Oedipus the King is the idea of sight vs. blindness. Sight is synonymous with ignorance, and blindness is synonymous with knowledge.This particular motif could be emphasizing many different themes, but one theme that applies to Oedipus is self-discovery. All throughout the Greek tragedy, Oedipus is meeting people and going through events to help him discover who he really is and all that he has done. Sophocles used the sight vs. blindness motif in Oedipus the King to emphasize the theme of self-discovery.
This passage of Oedipus Rex appears near the beginning of the play. Tiresias`s defensive statements occur shortly after Oedipus angers him with insulting language. This narration transpires shortly after Oedipus requests the name of Laius`s killer. Despite conversing with Tiresias in a civil, polite manner in the beginning, upon receiving denial in the form of riddles Oedipus reacts with an irrational rage. The anger that erupts inside Oedipus induces Tiresias`s condemning words that predict Oedipus’s downfall. This event emerges as a result of Oedipus’s hubris which leads to his demise. Tiresias`s lines in the passage reflects the derivation for which Oedipus`s fatal flaw, hubris, arises in his character through his comments, riddles, and sense of knowledge.
As stated before, Oedipus the King is replete with all types of irony, predominately dramatic and tragic irony. Irony in this tragedy is depicted in the king’s tragedy of fate. Sophocles, one of the most celebrated dramatic Greek playwrights during the Golden age of the Greek drama, blends dramatic and tragic irony in his play in a more multiplexed way than their abstract definition. It is found in most actions and speeches of the play. The playwright uses this striking dramatic device in Oedipus’ initial declaration. When Oedipus proclaims, at the beginning of the play, hat he is intent to vestige about the murderer of the former king Laius, it is evident that Oedipus, who is the tragic hero of the play, is ignorant. This is because the audience
The irony in Oedipus the King helps to develop the character of Oedipus throughout the play. It accomplishes this by the situational irony of his situation. For instance, Oedipus says, “I take the son’s part...I’ll find the hand that [killed Laius]”(Sophocles 251-255). He says this in a passionate speech about how he will save the city, but later regrets his rash words. When he finally accepts the truth of his parentage and marriage, he cries “Is there a sorrow greater”(1260)? He must also