Constructive communication is difficult when speaking with people from shared background. In a multicultural environment where these backgrounds are different, it is harder by orders of magnitude. Discussion about cultural and racial differences can quickly escalate into a heated argument, with ad-hominem attacks trumping concrete and racional arguments. Should we avoid difficult conversations then? Not in the slightest, communication is essential to progress, and we should encourage it as much as possible, while keeping it civil. Today’s technology allows anyone access to information and participation in public debate with platforms such as Facebook, and Twitter. Not all, however, are able to guarantee level of communication that is constructive. …show more content…
Quora “a place to share knowledge and better understand the world” (Quora, 2018). Here, users ask questions, answer, edit and organize them.While Facebook users try to take over the conversation, and ramble about unrelated stories, taking attention from primary purpose, Quora community cooperates, being interested in the other members’ opinions, perspectives and views. Users of this platform are adaptable for the benefit of the group. They often clarify, enliven the group conversation with interesting anecdotes, and encourage cohesive group communication by using humor in discussions that are particularly difficult. Moreover, Quora’s rating system promotes answers that are the most helpful. It relies on upvotes and downvotes provided by readers, reputation of the author and the domain …show more content…
To the question “What 's something that sucks about being white?”, Jim Lee answers: “I’m not White; in fact, I’m a Black male. But there is one thing I really wish people would stop doing to Whites: I am sick and tired of my White friends feeling as if they have to walk on eggshells around me. I am a grown man who needs no coddling or protection, and I tell people this all the time.” Morva Ory responding “…by the content of their character, not by the color of their skin. When are we going to stop stressing the differences between us and start working to unity?” gives a great example of cooperation. She inspires participation by using a wonderful quote and asking a question, rather than casting her judgement. Sandra in other place responds to a negative comment by harmonizing the conversation and stating: “That is an overly generalized stereotype, and has no place in an academic setting” (Sentes, 2018). Participants of the discussion were able to utilize Quora to understand the issue and have a conversation that I can come to and benefit from. It is a testimony to the power of social networking platform that thanks to thoughtful responses from informed participants is able to host a constructive
We have a tendency to have dialogue as more of a fight than a conversation. Tannen says that “noticing that public discourse so often takes the form of heated arguments of having a fight” (Tannen, pg. 8).
Due to the invention of modern technology, America has become the melting pot of different cultures and it shows most people are open to becoming cosmopolitan. The invention of technology have given society the ability to communicate with each other from all over the world. Americans have not fully embraced the idea of mutually agreeing about a topic through conversation alone because not every generation of people can see eye to eye. For example, the millennials and the Baby Boomers have two different perspectives on life because of their upbringing and many other factors. There is no peaceful mutual agreement between topics such as abortion, gay marriage or police brutality between the generations.
Universities and junior colleges are places where we learn different things and ideas from the different spheres and influences from our professors and instructors. These are also a place where we should value different opinions from both sides, in order to form a position in where you stand in your beliefs as a person, a balance opinion should be our utmost priority in order to have a constructive dialogue between both sides of the political spectrum. However, not validating and listening to the opinion of others can create a divisive rhetoric, where we end up ridiculing and criticising one another because of his/her political views. In the essay from Christina Hoff Sommers, “For More Balance on Campuses,” she criticises the liberalisation
We live in a world where the communication is the foundation for sharing information between people and debating is a formal way of communicating. Debating on the “Insurance policies obtained through the Affordable Care Act should be replaced by High Deductible Health Plans paired with tax free Health Savings Accounts” was challenging in many ways. My team was on the con side. From the beginning, all members of the team agreed that the Affordable Care Act is a controversial and complicated topic, however, ACA has made a number of positive changes to the health care system and increased access to health care services. In addition, the ACA has a tremendous impact not just on patients, but also on health care providers and workers.
One major problem I have encounter with the Hispanic population is how they distrust their medical provider if the provider is of a different race and does not speak their language and/or understand their culture. A large number of the patient’s we see only speaks Spanish and are from low socioeconomic status, some with little reading and writing comprehension. To complicated the situation they do not share with the medical staff or physician that they cannot read or write. Not being able to communicate makes it difficult to assess pain level; it can lead to the patient taking the medication incorrectly, and makes its difficult to build a relation with the physician. In a study done on 2014, the diabetic patient health outcome was improved
College: An Unsuccessful Diversification Project In her article, “Why America is Self-Segregating,” Danah Boyd emphasizes the importance of diversity in our social connections and explains, as members of a nation, we are segregating ourselves. Through culture, ethnicity, religion, and socioeconomic background, fragmentation is occurring daily. Boyd realizes that diversity is hard, but believes it is a crucial part of a successful democracy. Boyd explains that while the original goal of social media may have been to connect people from different cultures and nations, its effects have been working in the opposite direction.
There is a general belief among social media detractors that this form of communication is dehumanizing. People who spend all of their time updating their social media platforms with 140 characters of thought will fail to recognize the nuance of a real issue. It is common for a person with a potentially controversial stance to be completely dehumanized by social media lynch mobs, who do not care about the nuances of his message, rather, simply want his/her life destroyed for daring to oppose the mainstream narrative. Whether the goals of this opposition are good or bad, their message is often contained within a social media bubble where the nuances are completely missed. This leads to arguments on social media that completely miss people’s real points and instead engage in fallacious arguments that wander off topic (Miller,
There declaration to freedom through their actions and voices will live in our lives and history books forever. In similar fashion, growing up as a young teen in a society that is heavily driven by technology has a huge effect on the way I view our world and the importance of freedom within our speech. Technology gives people expression. Through sites like Facebook, twitter, and many more, a’lot of our social and political views are constructed through the following of others. Major examples include, celebrities, political leaders, religious advocates, and family values.
During childhood I was taught my parents that I was to respect every body no matter if they looked different than me. Having grown in such a diversity community I never encountered problems with people form different racial or ethnic background. I believe it is a blessing to have grown up in such a diverse community because you get to see interaction between people from different cultures. Therefore, I think it enables you to approach people from different ethnic groups with an open
Although social media can be powerful for voicing opinions and thoughts to a wide variety of people within minutes, it does not involve strong-tie connections and therefore results with less participates interested in the commitment and high risks necessary to catalyze a
My interest in intercultural communication and determination of pursuing a career in international education motivated me to apply for the MA ICBP at Warwick University. The decision has been carefully made based on my bachelor degree in International Communications Studies with Spanish, voluntary teaching in primary schools in China and Cameroon. After graduation, I wish to work for as an administrative coordinator in an international education institution or as a program manager of NGO, promoting quality education. With 3-5 year working experience, I will head for a PhD degree to prepare myself for a research-oriented position. Undertaking my bachelor degree in the first Sino foreign university, the University of Nottingham Ningbo China (UNNC), is the first step for me to engage in cross-cultural communication as a learner.
In order to use social media in an effective and responsible manner, one must professionally voice their opinions by using various methods and prevent the amount of misinformation from being rapidly spread. In today’s society, social media is a powerful tool for one to express their opinion. From reviews of a certain product to interpreting a movie’s plot, social media gives the average individual the ability to voice their opinion in which can be heard by millions of users. It is important for one to do this, especially on a platform with a diverse audience, because it assists in informing and persuading others to read and consider viewpoints that differ from their own.
An example of a diverse society is Singapore. The definition of a diverse society is to have different types of people, who do not share the same race, culture, ethnicity, beliefs, practices, race, tradition, et cetera, to ‘come together’ and form a community. Living in a diverse society has its advantages. One of the advantages is that it can increase one’s knowledge, awareness and understanding about others culture, ethnicity, beliefs, practices, customs, tradition, et cetera. Despite that fact that living in a diverse society has its advantages, it also has its disadvantages.
Cultural identity plays a very vital role in cross cultural communication, people from a particular culture communicate with partners and employees from many different cultures and in this situation every individual strives to keep their cultural and individual identity. According to Gardiner and Kosmitzki, identity is defined as “a person 's self-definition as a separate and distinct individual, including behaviours, beliefs, and attitudes” (Gardiner & Kosmitzki, 2008, p. 154). Also, Ting-Toomey defines identity as a "reflective self-conception or self-image that we each derive from our family, gender, cultural, ethnic, and individual socialization process"( Ting-Toomey, 2005). Both definitions bring out the generalisation of cultural identity
“Rules of different kinds guide all communicative interaction, and the learning of rules and of their proper application is essential to our becoming competent members of our society.” This statement means that rules are important in intercultural and interpersonal communication. Intercultural and interpersonal communications are guided by different rules such as family rules and social rules among others. People have to observe the rules of intercultural and interpersonal communication to communicate with different societies.