Are political elites both inevitable and necessary? Political elites can be defined “as persons who, by virtue of their strategic locations in large or otherwise pivotal organizations and movements, are able to affect political outcomes regularly and substantially” (cited in Higley, 2008). In other words, it refers to a small group of individuals that can influence the different political processes of a territory because of the strategic and influential position that they occupy in society. Considering that these selected groups are present in practically all societies it is important to consider the extent to which political elites are necessary and also whether they are inevitable or not. Consequently, the following essay will analyse if political elites are both inevitable and necessary. To do so, this essay will firstly present different views regarding the causes behind the existence of political elites in order to analyse if they are inevitable or not. Secondly, it will examine the extent to which the presence of these groups are a necessary …show more content…
2006). Furthermore, certain groups such as homeless have no public voice and also because the state is not neutral. Neo-pluralism, a reformulated version of classical pluralism, recognises that elite groups with excessive power exist in society as power is unevenly distributed. For instance, Lindblom admitted that large business corporations had extra power in politics as governments depended on them in order to achieve economic objectives (Smith in Hay et al. 2006). The influence of large-scale business could be seen with the bailout of the Northern Rock with British taxpayer’s money. Thus, this suggests that the economic and political structures that are practically impossible to be altered result in the existence of different political
This view is consistent with the theories of David Mayhew (The Electoral Connection, 1974) who asserts that the desire for
The Primary objective of all leaders should be to control citizens. A society that allows authority to be challenged will never succeed. This source depicts an authoritarian or totalitarian view of what a governing body should look like. The author suggests that the primary objective of government should be the “control of the citizens”, and therefore that the individuals should entirely obey said government.
Governmental power is often held by a few, and this also leads to problems as citizens feel that their voices are not being heard. This inequality is not seen only between people and the government, but also different groups of citizens today (gender, race,
As the textbook states, “Politicians at all levels of government succumbed to the financial favors that the wealthy could bestow on them in return for a contract or a favorable decision regarding
A political machine is a party organization that recruits its members by the use of tangible incentives—money, political jobs—and that is characterized by a high degree of leadership control over member activity. For example, the “The Bosses of the Senate '' photo gives the purpose of showing the corruption of government for businessmen to be in favor of legislation (Keppler, Doc. 3). Political machines can seem simple and complex, as most of them had underlying issues. The political machines provided avenues for Irish Americans to get jobs, food, or heating fuel in emergencies, and be rewarded through political appointments. However, the primary goal of political machines was to keep the power within themselves rather than provide good government.
Harvey 2005; Peck 2008; Springer 2010). Combined with an all encompassing commitment to extend the free market into virtually every aspect of life; neoliberalism is characterized by market deregulation, the redistribution of social service provision, and regressive tax policies that significantly enhance the power of elites and expand inequality (Harvey 2005). As a doctrine, neoliberalists "argue for the desirability of a society organized around self-regulating markets, and free, to the extent possible, from social and political intervention" (Glassman 2009: 497). As a policy neoliberalism often differs from its theory and the implementation of neoliberal policy is uneven (ibid).
Political machines obtained power through bribery and rewarding people who voted for them and caused corruption, poor service, racial tensions, and violence in local governments. During the Progress Era a wave of political reform and social activism began and political machines were removed causing various aspects of local government to change in favor of the public’s interest. Reformers politicians were now held more accountable to their community once they reached power when new voting rights were implemented. Minorities, women, and the poor were now able to have their voice heard through voting. By voting, the public’s interests were also heard concerning businesses as well.
After the movement, however, interest groups started to form a centralized role. “ The Progressive electoral reforms increasingly allowed a variety of middle-class and professional interests to be represented outside of the party system.” (Knott & Miller, 1987, p. 81) The effects of this can still be felt today with voter turnout significantly decreased and an increase in split ticket voting. (Knott & Miller, 1987, p. 81)
HIST 3005 Contreras 1 Luis Contreras Sophie Tunney 12/3/2018 The Needs of the people When a form of governing a state becomes obsolete it is sometimes best to do away with that form of governance and install a new form of government. In our “Shaping Of The Modern World” textbook we can find the source “Common sense” by Thomas Paine explaining how ineffective England’s rule over the colonies is, and we can also find “Social Order And Absolute Monarchy” by Jean Domat which argues in favor of absolute rule by the monarchy. Domat’s idea of absolute monarchy is flawed however because when a monarchy is in power it limits the growth of the state, stomp on the natural rights of its citizen’s, their decisions will affect their people
Big powerful special interest groups have interfered with politicians’ decision to do what’s right; it appears that the political system has become corrupted and money plays a big role in their decision and money is very influential in getting the legislators to pass bills. One would believe that our politicians are making the battles between the political parties personally; it appear that if the parties don’t agree with another, they resort to drastic measures such as shutting down the government causing more hardship on
Therefore, there is no threat to aristocracy in this nation. In cities and towns, there is, however, a constant threat of a rebellion and the only way to fix this issue is to give the people what they want: a new constitution. Not only will the constitution satisfy the citizens but it will also give power to the national government to accomplish the goals of a functioning nation. The new government will represent the states and create a strong nation that will strive for greatness. The national government provides a structure for the citizens to have a say in the nation’s direction through the voting process.
Analysis: Societies for centuries have searched for an answer to the enduring problem: “Who should rule us?” This question has been one of the central debates in political philosophy as well as in
He justifies the need for democracy, aristocracy and monarchy depending on location. The three philosophers use their judgment and prior knowledge on each other’s work to validate an ideal society, especially for the uprising continent of America. Governments are an established institution in every society. Though there are multiple types of governments, their purpose is fundamental to determining the influence on a civilization.
1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.
Many people believe that the election plays the most important role in democracy. Because a free and fair election holds the government responsible and forces it to behave on voter's interest. However, some scholars find evidence that election itself is not enough to hold politicians responsible if the institutions are not shaping incentives in a correct way. In other words, the role of the election on democracy, whether it helps to serve the interest of the public or specific groups, depends on other political institutions. I