In conclusion, I think that Gandhi was quite important in India gaining independence as he had done many things that impacted the peoples view of the British government, however I feel that other factors and individuals should also be given equal credit as they had also played a major part in the gaining of independence of India from Britain as they had not only impacted the wealth of Britain at the time but they had also changed not only the British governments view of the colony in India but also other countries view of it and so in my opinion, should the other factors and individuals not have played a part, Gandhi might not have managed to achieve independence for India from the
One of the major principles of the United States government has always been the freedom of speech given to its citizens, but what really comes with this freedom? Does this founding principle make it socially acceptable to create uncomfortable environments and use words to injure others? I think this right has limitations anywhere you go. Countries like Israel are making the word Nazi outlawed. And this isn’t because they’re trying to limit and control freedom of speech but rather because of its symbolic meaning in history.
The News won the case. Humans as individuals are able to express themselves even if their opinions are different. Freedom Of Speech allows us to speak directly about our opinions and express them. However, what we say shouldn’t have bad or negative effect on another people, in other words we use this right to speak freely but we shouldn’t violate another persons’ right by using Freedom Of Speech as
The Mughal dynasty itself was stripped of all recognition. The associated martial elites suffered a permanent loss of prestige as Indians of succeeding generations. Additionally, the consequence of the mutiny plowed the seeds of Indian nationalism into the minds of the Indian elites. In spite of the fact that some historians including Devji disagree on such a view, others do agree that the significance of the mutiny to the Indian nationalism. Duffett and others contend that the mutiny completely destroyed the fragile relations between the British and the Indians when the British made efforts to build a closer tie between the two groups with education and the liberation of the civil service.
The Indian National Congress was established by well-educated native Indians for political rights of the Indians due to the British government that strictly controlled India(Yue). Not only the advent of the political Congress Party, but also Muslim league, which both called for self-government appeared. In addition, many people who fought for the independence of India arose, such as Gandhi and Nehru. Without the British interception of Indian sovereignty, neither the Congress Party nor any Indians for India’s freedom would have
Which changed Indian history forever. It wasn’t in India Gandhi started campaigning for civil rights, it was when he visited South Africa. That’s where he made his first protest, that lead him to fighting for Indian freedom. Once Gandhi returned home from South Africa, he led the Indian national movement in 1915, which inspired the world to this day.
Speak only when there is something to actually talk about, not just to avoid silence and only provide your opinion when it is asked for. It would be amazing to see people try to be humane to one another and to be kind with their words, yet the tragedy is that the world we live in is simply not like
People often misunderstand how the right to protest free speech, and democracy works, often thinking in an entitled mentality “free speech is important for me” , the need to protest has increasing over past few years, many people are discontent with the globalization and the government. Protesting is a right, but when used for free speech, it is not always the answer. (state posision) The right to protest is one of basic human rights; however, the right to protest does not allow anyone to destroy the property. The injustices being done by groups does not merit the need more violence. As Martin King said “So I have tried to make it clear that it is wrong to use immoral means to attain moral ends.
Freedom of speech and expression is regarded as the first condition of liberty. Freedom of speech plays a crucial role in the formation of public opinion on social, political and economic matters. It embraces within its scope, the freedom of propagation and interchange of ideas, dissemination of information which would help formation of one’s opinion and viewpoint and debates on matters of public concerns.  Freedom of speech and expression implies the right to express one 's own convictions and opinions freely by words of mouth, writing, printing, pictures or any other mode. The phrase ‘speech and expression’ used in Article 19(1)(a) has broad connotation.
I think that if all the people will be respected and their rights of others, the world would be much less grief, tears and injustice. First and foremost human right is his right to life. It must be blessed to all. Also, everyone has the right not just to live your life, but to live it with dignity. To no one else to be humiliated personality, morally or physically.