Before going deeper, the definitions of both shared and personal knowledge must be addressed. In the context of this essay, shared knowledge is defined as socio-cultural knowledge; based upon a set of norms, values and cultural morals. According to the IB TOK syllabus, “While individuals contribute to it, shared knowledge does not depend only upon the contributions of a particular individual—there are possibilities for others to check and amend individual contributions and add to the body of knowledge that already exists.” Shared knowledge is shaped by ways of knowing including frames and filters, language, and logic and reasoning. Personal knowledge, however, is defined as knowledge of circumstance or fact, gained directly through first-hand experience or observation. Personal knowledge is sometimes called
It is said, therefore, that “culture is created, shaped, transferred, and learned through communication. Simultaneously, communication practices are largely created, shaped, and transferred by culture”. As a result, to be understood, the two concepts must be studied together. Precisely, culture cannot be known without a study of communication,
A model is based on its basic assumptions. In MOHO, it is believed that a human being is a complex system which is active and have a desire for doing. The personal and environment factors influence each other. In PEOP, there is a basic belief that people are naturally motivated to explore their world and demonstrate mastery in it (Baum and Christiansen, 2011). Considering the structures of these two models, they have shown their own characteristics, as well as some similarities and differences.
Furthermore, discoveries can be triggered by the uncovering of fresh and unique information that challenges one’s predilections. These concepts are explored within Jane Harrison’s Rainbows End, and Craig Silvey’s Jasper Jones, due to the constant challenging of characters prejudices and expectations towards themselves, others, and the world around them. Ultimately, this leads to a plethora of discoveries unfolding within both texts. Discoveries can be influenced by one’s personal, cultural and historical context, leading to a challenging of previously formulated perspectives. These discoveries can be emotionally and spiritually meaningful to an individual, due to a traumatising provocation of one’s values.
Analysis: Personal Space, Schramm’s Model and Social Penetration Theory Looking deeper on E. Hall’s model of proxemics, personal space is dependent on the relationship of both the speaker and the audience; the relationship is founded on the common experiences between the two. Having said those facts, Hall’s model of proxemics is strongly related to Schramm’s model of communication. W. Schramm’s model of communication states that for every communication transaction happening, there is always a common field of experience between the speaker and the audience. It is represented by a venn diagram which signifies each other’s identity. The overlapping area at the center of the venn diagrams is the common field of experience.
In order to effectively answer the question in hand, one must firstly define both terms. Shared knowledge is generated by a large number of people that have an overarching, similar belief over what is ‘right’, and thus what is ‘true’. Personal knowledge on the other hand, is what may be true to a single individual, without taking in account what ‘we know’ but much more what ‘I know’, thus posing a paradox between social conformity and individual beliefs. I have decided to tackle the knowledge question by analysing two areas of knowledge, the Human Sciences and the Arts, investigate the way in which shared knowledge shapes personal knowledge, how personal knowledge prevails over shared knowledge, and, finally, how both these beliefs of truth
In this essay I will be discussing on how shared knowledge can have an influence on personal knowledge. To start with, I will be discussing a situation that is ‘knowing a person’ to prove till a high extent that personal and shared knowledge have a great effect on each other including that shared knowledge can shape personal knowledge. To start with, knowing a person can fall under the two categories that are shared and personal knowledge. On one hand, personal knowledge which is gained from personal experience using intuition and instinct as a way of knowing. Equally important, if the person you know is at a deep level, for instance; a family member or a very close friend.
The word shape in this context implies affect and form. The title suggests that shared knowledge forms and affects our personal knowledge. I take the view that shared knowledge does shape personal knowledge as I treat shared knowledge as a framework of knowledge and through my personal experience, I can accept or reject the shared knowledge based on
Discovery means an individual aims at knowing owns own strengths. The essential element of the individual is Personal change and that happens through a journey of discovery. We can find out more about ourself through basic personality, how to transact with other individuals, preference of thinking and taking decisions through MBTI. As learning styles differ from one individual to other individual it gives a clear insight of what type of learning that we possess, How we do things, out of lot many positive resources that are available to us is