In the Penal Colony by Franz Kafka demonstrates a symbiotic relationship between the law and technology. Although technology and law may seem like two completely different topics, Kafka does a brilliant job of exemplifying the dependent nature of both subjects. At a quick glance, it may seem like the two do not have any type of relationship in the story. However, as the reader delves deeper into the true meaning behind Kafka’s words and intentions, the true nature of the relationship is revealed. Kafka shows that in In the Penal Colony, however complicated and advanced technology may be, without a just law, the technology will prove to be ineffective and will come crumbling down.
The law in Kafka’s story, comes off as very unfair and unjust.
…show more content…
“’I do not approve of your procedure,’ said the explorer … ‘So you did not find the procedure convincing,’ he said to himself and smiled, as an old man smiles at childish nonsense yet pursues his own meditations behind the smile.” (Page 160). The explorer disapproves of the law that the officer is still enforcing and plans to tell the new Commandant to remove the apparatus. This destroys the officer because the sole thing that he spent his life guarding and enforcing was disapproved in a second by the explorer. Now that the officer is mentally destroyed, he finds no more reason to live. “Now he stood naked there. The explorer knew very well what was going to happen, but he had no right to obstruct the officer in anything. If the judicial procedure which the officer cherished were really so near its end … then the officer was doing the right thing.” (Page 163). The officer decided to kill himself using the apparatus because, he rather die than continuing living and enforcing a different law. As the officer attempts to use the machine on himself, the apparatus starts to break down and ends up killing him within seconds, rather than the 12 hours it’s supposed to take. The apparatus breaking down symbolizes the technology beginning to break down after the law is unmasked to be unjust. In a harmonious relationship, without the law being able to continue to exist, the technology also fails to
Based on the experiment, it revealed that it was literally impossible for someone to have shot themselves from the distance stated at trial, even for a tall person, who tends to have longer arms. The defendant’s primary challenge to the government was that there was insufficient evidence of his wife’s arm. This argument could be used to defend him, the accused one because in reality, there is no evidence
“On my asking the soldiers why they had fired without order, they said they heard the word fire and suppose it came from Me.” said Captain Thomas Preston. The confusion of the soldiers and the unclear directions from the captain led to the merciless shooting. Had the orders been clearer, eleven men would not have
As a juror, you must render a verdict of guilty or not guilty, and follow the law and do so based on your opinion from the evidence that has presented in court over the last several weeks on the case of Valentine Shortis (Friedland, 1986). After going over my notes from the trial numerous times, the verdict that I have chosen to write down on my ballot is “not guilty.” As a reader, you might not comprehend my reasoning for this vote that goes against all the odds of what the Crown has been trying to persuade me not to consider. I have analyzed all the evidence, and in my opinion, I believe that Valentine Shortis is an insane man, and has suffered from a disease of the mind since childhood. On the night of March 1st 1895, Valentine Shortis
McKenzie and two other prisoners, “got over the walls of the supposed escape proof death house of three men sentenced to die in the electric chair” (McCormick 10A). Pete McKenzie was able to find a way to escape the death house, a task that was considered impossible. He observed the correctional officers, took note of the best times to escape, and planned accordingly with the other prisoners. Not only did he use his clever mind to escape prison, in an incident where a prisoner awaiting electrocution charged at an officer with a razor, McKenzie saved him and took the injury of the razor. After he was applauded, he had a chance to say, “Every time something violent happens to me they say ‘He’s a killer--he’s dangerous’.
“ Judge Briskey leaves the room.” Mr. Montresor would go to live the next ten years in Verona Maximum Security Prison before dying of aids he got from a blood transfusion after an inmate cut his arm with a shank. Mr. Montresor has been asked multiple times afterwards if he regrets killing his friend and every time he responds with the same answer.
The man knows this and feels bad for not liking the man’s eye, but believes his reason makes it okay. “It was the beating of the old man’s heart. It increased my fury, as the beating of a drum stimulates the soldier into courage.” Poe. The beating of the heart began to make him angry.
The documentary “Slavery By Another Name” Connects to the book of “ The Piano Lesson” written by August Wilson very clearly. The documentary discusses about, how thousands of african americans were pulled into forced labor with shocking force and brutality. The book describes the Characteristics of these people who had to experience what the documentary discusses about. “ Lymon bought that truck so he have him a place to sleep and to avoid his sheriff ; the sheriff looking for him” - Boy Willee. Lymon Answers, “ it 's just misunderstanding” In this book of Piano lesson,
In the early 19th century, hanging was the most common form of punishment by execution for major and serious crimes Prisons was a place that was used to hold debaters and people accused of crimes that were waiting or attending a trial. Some countries were not very responsible when it came up to locking up their sentenced criminals, instead they would “dump” their criminals in other lands ( Britain 's criminals deposited in Australia). By the 1830s, many areas in Australia were refusing to be the 'dumping-ground ' for Britain 's criminals. In order to solve this, Britain added 90 more prisons between 1842 and 1877.
While what he did was horrible and insane-like, the narrator did this process very sanely and put lots of thought into it. No absolute insane person would spend days and days watching someone sleep, or acting perfectly normal around victim just so they could tike their kill perfectly, even though watching someone sleep is an insane trait. He was very cautious in this, “But you should have seen how wisely I proceeded -- with what caution -- with what foresight, with what dissimulation, I went to work!” and proved to be quite patient, “It took me an hour to place my whole head within the opening so far that I could see him as he lay upon his bed.’’ So he couldn’t have been totally insane, right?
It is clear that Truman Capote believes that the systematic execution of murderers is flawed, and that the legal system in which death-penalty bound convicts are tried is a skewed one. In the novel, the reader finds out that Perry has been diagnosed by a psychiatrist as a paranoid schizophrenic. “More extensive
The prisoners had seen and experienced so much brutality, endured repeated beatings, and humiliated beyond imagination, so one more death did not affect them. Their emotions hardened to the point of being non-existent… or so they thought. Although the prisoners seemed hardened and unaffected by death, a different hanging did deeply affect them.
Final Essay America, the home of the free, but how free are we really? Incarceration rates over the past 30 years have soared, and currently 25% of all inmates in the world lie behind the bars of American prisons. (Approximately 716 per 100,000 peoples). Whether justified or not, our country locks up more people per year than any other country. Cases such as that of Tamir Rice, and Steven Avery exemplify both spectrums of the exploitation of our judiciary system.
Homicides are unlike many others, since one’s intentions are discrete as soon as they have a reason to murder. Threatened obligations are innumerable due to the character's personality and their way of thinking into certain circumstances, although a distinct detail can affect the situation. When little to none consequences have any impact to the “murderer” who caused victim's injury, or death, they are responsible regardless of what their intentions are. For instance, a distressed officer, U.S. Marshal Edward Mars, pleaded to end his miserable life due to the pain he was suffering from the shrapnel. Everyone in the camp suggests the cruel deed.
He kills the man by slamming a bed over him, then he severs his body and hides him under the floor. Later that night, police come to investigate, but they don’t suspect him. He confidently invites the police man to talk in his house. He is overcome with guilt and ends up
Kafka illustrates in his novel the permanent conflict between an elusive law and a vain search for truth and justice. In The Trial, the law appears to be hidden and distant while still demanding, through its representatives, rigorous obedience. Society is thus divided in two groups differentiating the people incarnating the law to those who must obey it. This submission, however, can lead to the lost of what constitute mankind, the one element, according to René Descarte, that truly differentiates humans to animals: the possession of our souls. Indeed, Joseph K is ashamed of the despicable nature of human kind and dies, in submissiveness towards the law, “like a dog”