Luminescence of the Incident Imagine people standing right by your house and committing horrendous acts; people whom, if given the chance, would not hesitate for a second before taking your life away. Imagine the fear and terror you would feel, and try to put yourself into the position of such a helpless somebody. The poem “Incident”, written by Natasha Trethewey, deals with a person in such a situation. The poem begins by the speaker telling the reader that the story that would now be told is told annually, emphasizing the significance of the story to “we”, presumably a family, based on clues given later in the poem. Then, using the verse “how we peered from the windows, shades drawn” (Trethewey 2), it immediately puts us in the place of the figures in the poem, by the usage of the imagery about the shades being drawn, as if hiding from something to be scared of, and by the careful choice of the word “peering”, instead of simply “looking” or “staring”, which gives us the sense that the figures are afraid of being seen. Then, despite having set up this mood of fear, the speaker takes a step back, and seems to be trying to calm us, the readers, down by reminding us that nothing really happened and that even the environment around the incident has now returned to its original, vivid colors. Following that, however, we are put back into the mood of fear by the repetition of the verse about peering, which is a benefit the form of a pantoum provides to the poem. Writing the
Conflict: A group of teens that are invited to a 3 day party on an island, start going missing and then are found lifeless, all with different death scenarios. There is only one killer on the island and nobody knows who it is... "Ten teens, Three days, One killer" Theme: The theme of this story is that you cant trust anybody, whether it is a close friend or a complete stranger because you don’t know what people are really capable of. This relates to this story because these teens cant trust anybody when many of them are starting to die and they don’t know who the killer, to them everybody is a suspect. Quotes from the book: "I want to point out that any of us could have committed these murders" "YOU READ MY DIARY???" Setting: This
Although the Landmine and the Rope in Melissa Range’s poems are both made to participate in horrifying violence against the innocent, the Landmine reveals its boastful indifference by twisting imagery of life and hope into a grotesque threat to haunt the world of peace long into the future, while the Rope reveals its humble sympathy by longing for a future that redeems violence by affirming life and beauty. The Landmine and the Rope are both tools of death throughout the two poems. The Landmine claims it will “bloom into a bouquet for an amputee” (4), vividly describing the pain and suffering that it will cause to whoever is unlucky enough to cross its path, even “children”(8). The fact that the Landmine mentions children as a potential victim proves that whether someone is an enemy or not, their lives are in danger.
Although the Landmine and the Rope in Melissa Range’s poems are both made to participate in horrifying violence against the innocent, the Landmine reveals its boastful indifference by twisting imagery of life and hope into a grotesque threat to haunt the world of peace long into the future, while the Rope reveals its humble sympathy by longing for a future that redeems violence by affirming life and beauty. The stories “The Landmine” and “The Rope” both have horrible way of killing people that don’t deserve to die. In the beginning of “The Landmine”, it shows very harsh and dark violence against people who are totally innocent. The Landmine is “in hiding” giving you no time to protect yourself from getting killed by it. It tells us “it
A sense of paranoia is imparted onto the reader as the speaker sits down to his Thanksgiving dinner with his family. The speaker is grateful that as his family enjoys their meal no one mentions the “shadow” hanging over him (20). This shadow is the realization of the possibility that as the speaker sits down to dinner with his family he could be sitting down to his demise as the Wampanoag did at the first Thanksgiving. Unlike in Shine, Perishing Republic this poem suggests that one cannot hide from impending doom, and its onset could happen at any moment, even when one expects it
The Landmine and Ropes Views on Innocent Death Although the Landmine and the Rope in Melissa Ranges poems are both made to participate in horrifying violence against the innocent, the Landmine reveals its boastful indifference by twisting imagery of life and hope into a grotesque threat to haunt the world of peace long into the future, while the rope reveals it's humble sympathy by longing for a future that redeems violence by affirming life and beauty. In the two poems “The Landmine,” and “The Rope,” Melissa Range strives to depict these two items as instruments assisting with violent death of innocent people. In “The Landmine” Melissa Range associates the explosion of a Landmine with the violent and gory title of an “amputee”(3).
In the ordinary hours of life I try not to dwell on it, but now and then, when I’m reading a newspaper or just sitting alone in a room, I’ll look up and see the young man coming out of the morning fog” (Ambush). Tim O’Brien was a father, a son, and a husband, yet he was also able to kill without giving thought to the action. Afterwards, however, when presented with his family, friends, and other civilians, Tim realized the gravity of the deaths he caused. Another example of paradox was the murder that in Queens, New York, around the same period as the Vietnam War. A criminal stabbed a woman outside her home, and out of the thirty-eight people in the neighborhood, zero people called the police or helped the woman.
What is the purpose of all the contrasting, descriptive imagery? What elements underlyingly stand for other items? The poem opens with the speaker reflecting on their past and relating to frogs asserting that they
This shows the juxtaposition of Incompatible objects that was a key component of the surrealist era. When the man arrives at the inn there is a lot of eye threatening imagery that relates to darkness. In this story there is a lot of frost imagery and explains the difference between the conscious and subconscious with the scene of the mirror. During this story he is narrating the events through surrealist imagery such as dream imagery and there is a sense of rupture when he shows the duet of thorns and violent. He paints the picture of the woman with her eyes on a tray and the sense of damage to the eyes is a Freudian idea and links in with the previous works of Dali and Buñuel.
Parker introduces her poem by using imagery to announce the simple development in the setting. It begins by saying, “as the sun rose” (line 7) and continues until she writes, “We didn’t speak until the sun overcame” (line 10). It is an uncomplicated way to provide an additional thought of change. By mentioning the small difference in the setting, Parker wants the reader to understand the importance of the many different aspects, large and small, that are evolving.
She utilises a diptych structure which portrays the contrast of a child’s naive image of death to the more mature understanding they obtain as they transition into adulthood. This highlighted in ‘I Barn Owl’ where the use of emotive language, “I watched, afraid/ …, a lonely child who believed death clean/ and final, not this obscene”, emphasises the confronting nature of death for a child which is further accentuated through the use of enjambment which conveys the narrator’s distress. In contrast, ‘II Nightfall’, the symbolism of life as a “marvellous journey” that comes to an end when “night and day are one” reflects the narrator’s more refined and mature understanding of mortality. Furthermore the reference to the “child once quick/to mischief, grown to learn/what sorrows,… /no words, no tears can mend” reaffirms the change in the narrator’s perspective on death through the contrast of a quality associated with innocence, “mischief”, with more negative emotions associated with adulthood, “sorrows”.
He could imagine his deception of this town “nestled in a paper landscape,” (Collins 534). This image of the speaker shows the first sign of his delusional ideas of the people in his town. Collins create a connection between the speaker’s teacher teaching life and retired life in lines five and six of the poem. These connections are “ chalk dust flurrying down in winter, nights dark as a blackboard,” which compares images that the readers can picture.
Trask’s first stanza is beautifully written, it includes an image of purity with the use of the dove, a common symbol of pureness, and a description of the still undisturbed waters. She then goes on to retell memories of collecting shells and hunting jellyfish creating an image of childhood fun for the reader to connect with. All in all the first stanza is pleasant to image of happiness and innocence, while the next stanza takes a turn for the worse. In stanza two the environment darkness as a storm rolls into the previously calm bay, all light is clouded and the smell of decaying life is detected. This dark image is a crucial turning point in the poem.
Edgar Allan Poe is an influential writer who is well known mainly for his dark and mysterious obscure short stories and poems. Throughout this essay I will analysing how poe uses a series of literary terms such as diction and anaphora in order to convey a bleak, eerie mood and tone. Poe uses these terms in order to contribute to his writing in a positive way, creating vivid images and a cheerless mood. In Poe’s poem, “The Raven”, he uses words such as lonely, stillness, ominous and fiery to add to the building up apprehension within the poem. In addition, he also uses repetition to create fluent yet unruffled, tragic feel for the reader.
These sections set themselves apart from others by their use of imagery: “... and I planted carrot seed that never came up, for the wind breathed a blow-away spell; the wind is warm, was warm, and the days above burst unheeded, explode their atoms of snow-black beanflower and white rose, mock the last intuitive who-dunnit, who-dunnit of the summer thrush...” (Frame 3). These passages serve to highlight how Daphne 's mind deviates from the norm. She has an unusually vivid imagination that seems almost childlike at times. The use of personification puts further emphasis on her childishness, but her overactive imagination is not always harmless and sometimes takes a darker turn, revealing fears that appear to be deeply
The main focus of the poem was the unexpected visit of a raven to the narrator-s house. The bird serves as a constant reminder to the narrator of the death of his true love and the sadness that it brings him. It is left unclear if the bird literally came to his doorstep or the narrator was making it up. Some might say the raven was real because of how the narrator described it, from its color to its feathers. A raven is also a very common animal, so they might think it could still happen.