In the essay, “Richer and Poorer” written by Jill Lepore, and published in The New Yorker on March 16, 2015, the author discusses the income inequality in the United States and uses the rhetorical stages logos, ethos, and pathos as methods for trying to inform the educated middle class about the economic inequality and the effects on the individuals.
Jill Lepore used various other sources to prove her point. Using the Gini Index, Lepore states that “income inequality is greater in the United States that in any other democracy in the developing world” (1). She goes on to give a few statistical points influencing her statement on how the inequality has increased throughout the decades. Including how in between 1975 and 1985, for U.S households from .397 to .419; compared to other countered such as Netherlands. France, Germnay, Sweden and Finland
…show more content…
Jill Lepore targets the feelings of viewers to catch the attention and how serious it really is to have such a drastic inequality in our country. This is a great representation of pathos at play. She talk about a portrait called “Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis by authors Simon and Schuster” of four generations. It has a story behind it as far as the lives of poor young people. It embodies how no matter what background a child comes from, equal opportunity is a right. The fact that it is the best way to get Americans to care about poverty. A quoted verse says, “ is a split-screen American nightmare, a community in which kids from the wrong side of the tracks that bisects the town can barely imagine the future that awaits the kids from the right side of the tracks.”(3) Pathos is very obvious for the fact that Lepore is feeding into what people care about most; kids. So the educated middle class can really feel the situation and picture
Oscar Lewis’s paper, “The Culture of Poverty,” discusses many of the different ways poverty can shape people’s actions. The movie Los Olvidados has many examples of the types of lives one can lead in a poverty stricken society. Meche is a young girl that must face the harsh reality of womanhood early and Pedro is a young boy who does not know how to be good and suffers dire consequences because of it. These two characters stand out from the movie because they fit many of the observations from Lewis’s paper. Peter has no father figure in his life because his mother never knew his father and the other children’s father had passed away.
Pathos dominates the article when Ehrenreich allows her nephews mother in law, grandchildren, and daughter to move into her house. The situation focuses on pathos because in Ehrenreich’s personal story she includes that “Peg, was, like several million other Americans, about to lose her home to foreclosure” (338). She is effective in her writing by appealing to the readers’ emotions through visual concepts and personal experiences. When I read the article, I felt emotional because the working poor are not fortunate to know if they will have a house or food the next day. I agree with Ehrenreich in which the poor are as important as the wealthy group who get more recognition.
Economic inequality is the uneven distribution of wealth and differences in economic security found in each individual in a specific country or region. Today, the topic is being discussed profusely by the American presidential candidates and by many writers around the world because of the beliefs of whether there should or should not be wealth redistribution policies put into action. Larry Schwartz, the author of “35 Soul-Crushing Facts about American Income Inequality”, makes a valid claim that economic inequality is the foundation of the problems that the entire American population face such as poverty and a hindrance of economic growth. To begin with, Schwartz has an exceptional argument that the high rate of economic inequality, like is
After reading this book “Mama Might Be Better off Dead” my perception of life has changed. I guess this story open my eyes of to what could happen to a family if they do not have adequate healthcare in America. My eyes became open to the point that many American families are suffering and are crying for help and if not addressed the cry will become louder, due to the expected increase in the ageing population in America in the next twenty years. Coming from a similar background as the Bane’s family, where I’m also African American born and raised on the Westside of Chicago, and also grow up in a life of poverty, I guess this book had a direct affect on me. I seriously began to think critically about the future of my family’s health, particularly my mother.
Pimpare’s article, talks about how Hollywood movies promote that poverty is a “state of mind, rather than a condition we create through our politics and public policy” (Pimpare 2). This show how our society has stereotyped people who are living in poverty, as people who just don’t care. This is clearly rebutted in “Daddy Tucked a Blanket Around Mama’s Shoulders. Tears Were Dropping Off His Cheeks” by Randall Williams. He talks about how hard his dad worked to try to improve their status, “No matter how much money Daddy made we never made much progress up the social ladder”
Lizabeth recalls a snippet of her childhood from a first-person point of view, and she explains that as a kid, she was unaware of the poverty that limited her and her family. Years later, Lizabeth tells, “We children, of course, were only vaguely aware of the extent of our poverty. Having no radios, few newspapers, and no magazines, we were somewhat unaware of the world outside our community” (Collier 444). In her narration, Lizabeth explains that from her perspective as a child, she was oblivious to the true extent of her poverty. Lizabeth’s words, “unaware of the world outside,” show how she is trapped in a bubble of ignorance, believing that she is free when in reality, she cannot escape the oppression her family faces.
To answer question two, to compare and contrast immigration prior and during the late 19th would be that both were for personal well being. Those that settled in America, say the pilgrims, came here for religious freedom more or less. They sought for this new land to bring them new opportunities for a better life. The main difference between these waves of immigration has to be this notion of the “American Dream”. Though this new wave of immigrants did come seeking a better and new life, there was something a little different that separated them from the pilgrims.
I viewed Frontline a documentary series, which episode was entitled Poor Kids. The frontline personnel spent time with three children Kailey, Johnny, and Britany along with their families as they all struggle financially. We perceive a glimpse of what it is like to live below the poverty line in America through a child’s eyes. While observing the documentary, I became consciously aware that children who are considered poor or living below the poverty line were more mindful of the responsibilities of life. The children were worrisome of the lack of employment for their parents, bills, and in Britney’s case; how they would accommodate their way of living to support a new addition to the family.
A generalization that is constantly made about the poor is that they are lethargic and don 't improve their families life. In the motion picture Poor Kids Brittany , Jasmine and Kaylie families are not apathetic they do all that they could to eat get the opportunity to work and give a spot to their children to rest their heads. These families demonstrate that they are resolved to better their
Poverty The essay “What is Poverty” written by Jo Goodwin Parker talks about how she lived in poverty since she was a child, but she also makes it clear that she does not want anyone to feel pity for her or her family. Parker and her three children live in dirt and overall disgusting conditions. She also talks about all the different aspects of living in poverty. For Jo Goodwin Parker, personally, being poor destroyed her and stuck with her through childhood and adulthood.
Wealth and Inequality in America Inequality The inequality in America has increased over time; the gap between the rich and the poor has become a problem that many Americans don’t see. Inequality is the extent of income which is distributed unequally among the citizenry. The inequality of the United has a large gap between the poor and the rich making it unfair to the population, the rich are becoming wealthier and the poor remain poor. The article “Of the 1%, By the 1%, For the 1%”, authored by Joseph E. Stiglitz describes that there is a 1 percent amount of American’s who are consuming about a quarter of the United States income in a year.
In the passage “What is poverty?”, the author Jo Goodwin Parker, describes a variety of things that she considers to portray the poverty in which she lives in. She seems to do this through her use of first-person point of view to deliver a view of poverty created by a focused use of rhetorical questions, metaphors, imagery, and repetition to fill her audience with a sense of empathy towards the poor. The author’s use of first person point of view creates the effect of knowing exactly what she is feeling. “The baby and I suffered on. I have to decide every day if I can bear to put my cracked hands into the cold water and strong soap.”
3.1 How income inequality affect on people live in America. The income gap in America affects people, who live in this country. The issue has a strong impact in America’s society; in particular, the nutritional disparity between rich and poor people. In USA, the food gap becomes the top signal for the class distinction, but it used to be clothing or fashion. The food inequality in America is not only influencing the poverty, it is also cost hundreds of billions of dollar per year because of Non Communicable Diseases (NDCs) (Ferdman, 2014).
The middle class want to become rich and the low class only wants equality.” Orwell’s predictions of the party, the government in modern society, rises to power and the poor stay poor. In LA Times “Income Inequality makes the rich more scrooge-like, study finds”, “Since the 1980’s -- the end of a 30-year period… wealth has grown increasingly concentrated at the top of the economic ladder, while low-income Americans have commanded a smaller and smaller share of the nation’s wealth.” *add where quote is from* ”... top 5 percent of American families saw their real income increase 74.9 percent… the lowest-income fifth saw a decrease in real income of 12.1 percent… Sharply contrasting with the 1947-79 period… with the lowest income group actually seeing the largest gains.”
Inspired by Langston Hughes’ poem, “Harlem” and her own experience, Lorraine Hansberry authored A Raisin in the Sun. Hansberry used the locale of South Side, Chicago where she was born during a time of social and political turmoil as the backdrop to her play. Through the lens of Marxist’s critical theory about contradictions building into social systems that lead to social revolution, Hansberry depicts issues related to racism and discrimination. Hansberry’s father was a successful real estate agent, but despite her family’s wealth, the law of Chicago required the Hansberry family to live in the ghetto South Side. Similar to the plot of the play, Hansberry’s father bought a home in a Caucasian neighborhood and after the family settled into their new home, a brick was thrown through the window almost hitting Hansberry (Plays and Playwrights, 1540).