Ingratiation In Interpersonal Behavior

1111 Words5 Pages

Ingratiation
It refers to “a class of strategic behavior illicitly designed to influence a particular other person concerning the attractiveness of one’s personal qualities” (Jones, 1964). These involves complementing another person or indulging in flattery with certain amount of credibility and honesty. It also involves opinion conformity, agreed with another person’s view point. It has been observed that we like those who think or act like us. Rosenfeld et al., (1995) states that ingratiation (facilitates interpersonal relations and enhance harmony within the organization.
Ingratiation is defined as “a class of behaviors employed by a person attractive to another” Wortman & Linsenmeier 1977). Subordinate ingratiation has been demonstrated …show more content…

(Jones, 1990; Jones & Pittman,1982). As Jones (1990) points out, the principal goal of individuals using intimidation is to be seen by other as tenacious and forceful. Those people who use these strategies also run the risk of being perceived unfavourably.
¬¬¬¬¬¬

According to Yukl and Tracey (1992); claim that intimidation might enhance the employee’s ability to get the job done and may lead to being perceived as a hard-charging employee. As a result, the supervisor will rate this employee more favourably. In contrast organizations who value teamwork and cohesiveness will give intimidating people lower performance rating (Falbe & Yukl, 1992). The inference of research studies of Jones & Pittman (1982); Wayne & Liden (1995) is that there are both positive and negative repercussions of intimidation strategies of impression management on performance …show more content…

It can also be defined as the strength of one’s motivation to work in a chosen career role. This definition focuses on motivation and goal’s achievement within a specific career field. The definition is based on Colarelli (1990) and Hall (1971). Research findings by Myrtle, et al., (2008) stated that career commitment is strongly associated with employment-related experiences (Management level, job security, industry segment, position tenure, and the degree to which current position meet up the expectations with career) than try change, career patterns, career stage, and satisfaction with career progression) According to Hall, career is more broadly applied and is commonly considered to be the lifelong sequence of role related experiences of individuals (Hall, 2002).

One of the most basic issues in organizational psychology in the previous decade has been that of the current and future status of a career. Many profound changes have happened to impact on careers causing a change in both the realization and the management of a career. The demise of the traditional career has been due to major organizational changes such as downsizing, re-structuring and new practices as well as the broader society’s understanding of the meaning of a career. These are resulted to various opportunities in terms of career development and

Open Document