Innate Knowledge And Plato's Theory Of Knowledge

792 Words4 Pages
Theory of knowledge is a yield of doubt. When we seriously really know anything at all, we innate lead into test of knowing, in the hope of being capable to discriminate the trustworthy beliefs from such as are untrustworthy.
Knowledge is the principal intellectual attainment studies of epistemology. Virtually all theorists agree that true belief is a necessary condition for knowledge and it was once thought that justification, when added to true belief, yield a necessary and sufficient condition for knowledge. All of us have an innate knowledge, concepts, forms, or universals that are an essential and inborn part that compose our mind. Without this rational knowledge would be impossible. Innate knowledge is a field of epistemology, which is the study of how human person can know something. According to Aristotle’s critical study of Plato’s theory of knowledge could not exist by themselves, but only in particular things. Since substances must be capable of independent existence, it appears that they cannot be universals but particulars. However, this generated a dilemma since Aristotle also believed that only knowledge was defined and the object of scientific knowledge ( Introducing Grace Wester Thinker ).
Thus if the substance is knowable, they cannot be particulars. But now it looks as if substance cannot exist at all since they cannot be either knowledge or particulars. According to Plato, knowledge can be gained by researching within, but Plato also addressed the
Open Document