Sarah Lewis
10/26/15
Mr. Bishop
HIS 131-05IN
It Takes Many Men to Make a Country
Joseph J. Ellis reveals just how much each person’s decisions affect the history of America in Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation. It is a good representation of America’s past emphasizing the various people involved. It starts slow but improves as the book progresses by including multiple accounts of the same story, many different sources, and facts to verify the different statements. America came to be on July 4, 1776. Since this day, America has greatly expanded and become one of the world’s leading countries. The development of America and its government did not just occur on its own. It took many great men, difficult decisions, and quite
…show more content…
He covers people such as Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and Thomas Jefferson. He does not cover everything about these people; just the portions of their lives that he feels are the most important to America’s history. The entire first chapter discusses the duel between Hamilton and Burr. It emphasizes the importance of honor these two men wished to obtain. Ellis summarizes the whole purpose of the duel when he says, “Honor mattered because character mattered.” (47) Good character was essential to becoming important in the political world. With a new government just starting out, being involved in the political scene was a high priority for these men. They could not seem to work out their differences so they had a duel. The duel resulted in the death of Alexander Hamilton. Ellis references a viewpoint in favor of Hamilton and one in favor of Burr. Although no one will ever know exactly what happened during the duel, Ellis points out that it forever changed the life of Burr. Burr’s decisions ruined his chance at being a leading man in the government and therefore influenced who would pick up where Burr had left off. This situation emphasizes Ellis’s argument that men make history. Ellis not only uses stories to prove his point; he also used a chart to make his facts easy to …show more content…
The chart on page 102 makes the numbers about the north and the south easy to compare. He also manages to incorporate song lyrics, speeches, and direct quotes. This is an effective method because it utilizes multiple information methods. Joseph Ellis uses various types of sources in Founding Brothers. He gathers material from the founding fathers letters, speeches, biographies of men such as Burr, and novels. Ellis provides an extensive list of creditable sources basing his argument on research. The founding fathers thoughts and words affected their decisions, which influenced the fate of the country. George Washington’s Farewell Speech revealed his decisions to leave the presidency after two terms. “This was both a matter of personal pride and a crucial political precedent.” (149) Washington’s decision to step down after two terms would eventually become a presidential requirement. Washington’s choice affected the history of almost every president that followed
Judith St. George wrote a book called The Duel about the parallel lives of Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr. In the book, with 2 different lenses, she talks about them being students. Burr and hamilton had similar experiences but St. George wanted us to see how they are different as well. At only the age of 13, Burr got accepted to the College of New Jersey, now known as Princeton. Hamilton's lens was different.
“Hamilton” is a popular musical created by Lin-Manuel Marinda, based on the political career of Alexander Hamilton, one of the founding fathers of the United States, but is not completely and truly told leaving misconceptions about some things to be left floating around. Regardless of its praise and success, some viewers of the musical could experience misconceptions and confusion about the events that led to the famous duel between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton. Although the musical accurately presents many historical facts and personal characteristics of the characters, the portrayal of events and characters’ personalities could lead to a misrepresentation of the events that affected the outcome of the duel. The portrayal of Burr could also cause confusion and misconceptions about his true intentions,
In a companion volume to his best-selling biography John Adams (2001), David McCullough closely examines a year of near-mythic status in the American collective memory: 1776. It was the year that the Continental Congress, meeting in steamy Philadelphia, decided, “these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states.” It was also the year that the American Revolution began in earnest and was nearly lost. With his strong sense of narrative and his gift for capturing the humanity of his subjects, McCullough leads readers through a well-known story with both style and grace.
The novel, The Founding Brothers, is a piece of historical literature written by Joseph Ellis that follows the lives of the founding fathers of the United States of America. The story begins as the nation was just entering its beginning days of freedom as the Constitution was being tweaked to perfection, despite differences of opinion the authors of the document faced. The story then proceeds to tell the tale of Burr’s defeat of Hamilton as a result of their famous duel, and Ellis stresses the importance of knowledge of the context of the quarrel. The author then analyzes the truth regarding the dinner discussion of important issues between Jefferson and Madison, and how the account could very easily have been tainted by Jefferson’s bias. Shortly afterwards, the issue of slave trade and the manner in which the issue was handled is analyzed.
In order to understand why and how the feud took place between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr we must walk behind the footsteps of each man before they pulled the trigger on July
After a fiercely fought revolution, the newly independent American nation struggled to establish a concrete government amidst an influx of opposing ideologies. Loosely tied together by the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen sovereign states were far from united. As growing schisms in American society became apparent, an array of esteemed, prominent American men united in 1787 to form the basis of the United States government: the Constitution. Among the most eminent members of this convention were Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. These men, held to an almost godly stature, defined the future of the nation; but were their intentions as honest as they seemed?
Burr is furious at Hamilton for his loss. After many years of disagreement, Burr kills his enemy Hamilton in a duel that went down in history. Even after his success, Burr is left to multiple trials of treason and many hours in court. Many people despise Burr and try to convict him of crime; however, their lawyers are no match to those of Aaron Burr. In the end of the biography, Burr spends time in Europe before going back to the United States to
Chapter one, The Duel, is centered on an “interview” that took place between two important historical figures, Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton. The event was categorized as an “interview” because dueling was illegal at the time. At the “interview,” Hamilton was fatally wounded by a bullet shot by Burr that ricocheted off Hamilton’s rib through several of his vital organs. The feud between the two began in 1789 when Burr strategically manipulated people to take the position of Attorney General of New York, over someone who Hamilton supported. Later, in 1791, Burr beat out Hamilton’s father-in-law to become senator.
America was going through a large amount of transitions and changes in the country during the Revolutionary period . Not only was it fighting for its freedom and Independence from Britain, it was also working and delving into its own form of government, which was not an easy process. With such large scale and important events happening, it took a lot of people to communicate and take action together. One of these men at the epicenter of the nation was Aaron Burr, surrounded by individuals to work with and off of to achieve what he desired. One such individual was
In The Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation by Joseph J Ellis, the founders of America-Washington, The Adams, Hamilton, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, and Burr-are discussed and examined from top to bottom. He goes back in time and goes over the events that took place then, explaining to the reader how the decisions the leaders made created the ripple effect that it had on the current time period. Periods in the timeline such as Washington retiring from The Presidency, The arguing between the North and South side over African slave trade, and the issue of the countries national debt are examples of what he discusses. As the book progresses, the reader is given a chance to view the timeline of events from a modern perspective, and
After a series of “paper wars” between the political opponents, Burr challenged Hamilton to a duel, which Hamilton accepted. According to Freeman, Hamilton accepted Burr’s challenge for a number of reasons. “In his mind, the duel; was a praiseworthy attempt to serve the common good... yet it was also an intensely personal attempt to preserve his public career. To prove to the world, and to himself, that he was a man of his word, a man of courage and principle, a leader.”
In the opening number, Burr introduces Hamilton as a “bastard, orphan, son of a whore and a Scotsman”: lyrics derived from a contemptuous description by John Adams. Burr was born to privilege—his father was the president of the college that became Princeton University, and Jonathan Edwards was his maternal grandfather—but, like Hamilton, he was orphaned at an early age, studied law, and turned to politics. In Miranda’s telling, they are negative images of each other, Hamilton’s heated recklessness contrasting with Burr’s icy caution. “Hamilton is this orphan with nothing to lose, and Burr is this orphan with everything to lose,” Miranda
In the book The Heartbreak of Aaron Burr the author, H.W. Brands, takes and obvious stance in favor of Burr. In comparison to the first chapter of The Duel by Joseph Ellis, many differences in the authors’ opinions are apparent. Brands heavily favors Burr. It is completely clear in many instances of his writing in the book. The most evident tool used in Brands’ near-propaganda is his word choice.
Hamilton, however, refused, claiming he had no recollection of insulting Burr. In Hamilton’s eyes, these were only Cooper’s words and Cooper’s interpretation of what Hamilton had said. Burr did not accept this as a good answer, and in the several letters that followed, he demanded that Hamilton withdraw and renounce any of Hamilton’s previous opinions or statements that harmed Burr’s honor and reputation over the previous fifteen years. Part three: The Duel and its
Founding Brothers In the "Founding Brothers" by Joseph Ellis he tries to tell us a story about our founding fathers and their great generation. He tells us about some of our founding fathers and what they had to do to set the frame work for our government today. He also talks about some of the issues they face and how they will later dissolve into issues to follow later. These leaders are considered to be our revolutionary leaders. They argued that succession from the British empire is enviable.