“Whenever you feel like criticizing anyone… just remember that all the people in this world haven’t had the advantages you had.” -Nick Carroway “People who have been given advantages due to [social] class, education, and/or wealth have more of an obligation to serve others.” - Nick Carroway’s father. The two quotes above state that some people don’t have the luxuries that others have. Unfortunately, those who have the luxuries don’t always put them to good use. I take the same side as Nick Carroway’s father. Those who have been given certain advantages should have more of an obligation to serve their societies. If someone has the resources, will, and/or knowledge to help fellow citizens, then they should put some effort into helping others. …show more content…
A small gesture of philanthropy can help raise people's reputation. But if they just help people for the sheer will of being a good summeritain, then let them. If they don't do anything to help their insignificant others, then they should be scolded for not caring for others or their society. If someone has a higher education, then they can put it to use. This is an unstable part to the supporting side of the quote. If someone does have a higher education than another, then it's not their fault. The person with the lesser education level is to blame. It was their choice to continue with their education or
They mention on page 209, paragraph 1, that not all college degrees or college graduates are equal and that for certain schools, majors, and occupations, college may not be a smart investment.
The Life You Can Save by Peter Singer is a book explaining that our current response to world poverty is not only lacking, but ethically weak. He argues that we need to change our views of what is involved in living a moral life. Throughout the book, Peter proposes ways to save money to donate and then giving it to reliable charities and also, he offers a seven-point plan that mixes personal philanthropy, local activism, and political awareness to help us play our part in bringing about change. In response to this book, some people have taken Singer’s advice and started to follow his plan towards helping end world poverty, while others have criticized him and exclaimed that it is not his place to tell people what to do. I myself agree with
In the articles, “Is College Worth It” written by David Leonhardt and “Why College Isn’t for Everyone” written by Chris Matthews, both writers build an argument to persuade readers that attending college is for everyone and is a time to emphasize one’s thoughts for the future. In the article, “Is College Worth It”, Leonhardt begins his argument by using statistics. Leonhardt states that, “Americans with four-year college degrees made 98 percent more an hour on average in 2013 than people without a degree” (Leonhardt, par. 3). This implies that individuals who have earned a bachelor's degree or higher are more likely to earn more money per hour compared to those who do not have a degree.
In one circumstance, we may feel the need to give to those who are poor to keep them from getting in our personal space; and in other circumstances we feel that we give to others out of the kindness of our heart. I completely agree with Ascher and her views on compassion, because I have been in similar situation where I have questioned why people give money, and whether they give with a whole heart or out of necessity. Furthermore, this essay can teach us plenty of lessons that can be utilized throughout our lives so we can teach others and make them aware of the need to be more
The fact that not everyone needs to go to college is the main point that Stephanie Owen and Isabel Sawhill write about in great detail throughout their essay. Even though the authors do say that people that go to college usually earn more, they state that this is on “average,” and that the key focus of their essay is to focus on those that the benefits are not greater than the cost of going to college. (Page 211, Paragraph 1). They also include a graph right under the text that shows how “on average” people with a college degree earn more than those that are just high school graduates. (Page 211, Figure one).
The more wealth someone has makes them have less empathy toward others. The
Some even make generous philanthropies to the people who are less fortunate. Although it is good to be a “Captain of Industry”, Rockefeller and Walton were both degrading “Robber Barons”. From this moment forward
Wealth, no matter how important an appearance it has, cannot fulfill a life and make a demeaning impact on lives until their
So people should realize that one still could learn important things while working certain jobs that don’t require a college degree and it doesn’t mean that person is not smart. In the article, “Are Too Many People Going to College,” the author mentions how “…college is seen as the open sesame to a good job” (Murray 245). Also it glorifies the benefits of receiving higher education. For example, there are people that make more money with a college degree then someone without one (Murray
1. Short-response prompt (15 points) Read the following excerpt from Patrick Henry's speech to the Convention of Delegates in Virginia (1775): It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, peace, peace — but there is no peace. The war is actually begun.
In Rotherham’s article he says “According to the Bureau of labor Statistics, in 2010, the median weekly earnings for someone with some college but no degree were $712, compared to $1,038 for a college graduate. ”the evidence provided clearly shows that getting a higher education and investing time and money into getting a college degree can result in earning more financially for people to support themselves and their families. The opposing side of this argument might say that “even though begin a college graduate, and having a degree can lead to finding well paying jobs. Graduates are often left drowning in
No matter the amount the poor or George and Lennie put into what they do it seems that they are forever stuck being low class. When one hits that line of poverty it is almost game over for that person; the chances of them moving up the economic ladder is pretty slim for them, especially for the time. In modern times, here in the us it is said that “ There's a 7.5 percent chance someone born into the bottom fifth of America's income distribution gets to the top fifth,” (Smialek). As for staying stuck in their class, on average about 43 percent of people remain in the bottom percentile (“The Numbers Show…”). Compared to the rest of the world this is very low.
So with this data I can confirm that the higher the education that you get the more money you get so people with no degree will end up stuck behind and unable to really help the economy
(Procon.org). Learning and engaging in everything is a skill everyone should have, so like he said we should go to college to be able to do that. Additionally, education shows people to develop more intellectual skill and become more responsible (Pew Social and Demographic Trends). Thus said, being educated and smart is something everyone can do and college helps with that. Likewise, college can make someone more educated and happier.
Then they would really be educated.” Support for Refutation: The counterclaim is wrong that we don’t need a college degree for future jobs because on support #1 it says you don’t need a college degree for those jobs but some of them do because some are high tech and about working in hospital and if you want to learn more you would go to college. “ In order to succeed. Your desire for success should be greater than your fear of