Servant and Authentic leadership have several characteristic comparisons. Both servant and authentic leadership styles are positive leadership styles. Servant and authentic leaders serve other individuals. They both believe in empowering the employees they serve. The leadership styles possess a high standard of values, displays compassion and passion for integrity to their followers. These leadership styles will not comprise on their character. Both leadership displays relationship with people or followers. They rely on their personal charisma to get things done. Authentic leaders are positive, they are transparent with their followers and have a sense of themselves (Yaacoub, 2018). These leaderships lead because of their own personal …show more content…
K. (2016). Authenticity: Sustainable Benefits Beyond Performance. People & Strategy, 39(4), 47-49. . According to Article Abstracts (2015), a servant leader has characteristic valuing people, humanity, listening, trusting, caring, integrity, service and empowering others. The two styles servant and authentic leaders have similar techniques, yet they have differences in their approach, application, and style. The difference in the approach is the servant leaders attempts to be right whereas, authentic leaders aims to be real. Servant server is normative, which display an example of character that all followers should emulate. The authentic leaders believe all leaders are uniquely formed by a leader’s character and personality. Servant leadership believes one should provide priority to others interest. Leaders should server others to meet their desires, needs and aspiration. Leaders should service and develop their employees (Nahavandi, 2015) leaders do not encourage leaders to go over and beyond to meet the need of the individual problems. Servant leadership listens, persuades, and give empathy during times of crisis. Authentic leaders adapt their style to the situation. Authentic leaders have a positive impact on followers, groups, and organization (Yaacoub, 2016). These leaders can be motivating on one hand and change to another style depending on the condition. Both leadership styles look for ways to partner with people, groups or organization. Servant uses measures to a leaders effectiveness (Reed, Vidaver-Cohet & Colwell, 2011). This leadership to identify organizational, societal, and environmental issues. The true difference is authentic leadership engage in innovation and creative solutions
In reading “Serve To Be Great’ written by Matt Tenney, I was introduced to a new perspective on leadership. Servant leadership is a philosophy and set of practices that enriches the lives of individuals, builds better organizations and ultimately creates a more just and caring world. Servant leadership is more a way of life than a management technique. Tenney believes that making your employee’s happiness the priority
Servant Leaders are leaders who put others needs above their own. Martin Luther King Jr. and Cesar Chavez are two examples of a servant leader. Three things that they both have in common are empathy, able to understand others, conceptualization, the ability to dream good for their people, and community building skills. Martin Luther King Jr. had empathy for people who are being discriminated because he was discriminated for his skin color. Being a civil rights leader King was elected to be in charge of the MIA, Montgomery Improvement Association, where he and the black community organized protest against segregation.
Leaders do more than delegate, dictate, and direct. Leaders help others achieve their highest potential (ANA, 2015). There are several different types of nursing leadership styles such as Servant Leadership, Transformational leadership, Authoritarian or Autocratic Leadership, Laissez-faire Leadership, and etc. Each leadership type highlights a different area and approach into nursing leadership. In the 1970’s, Robert Greenleaf created this term, Servant Leadership, to describe leaders who influence and motivate others by building relationships and developing the skills of individual team members.
Leadership is not limited to one set method, skillset, or personality type. There are many different styles of leadership, but I believe that the most effective style for success in an organization, such as FFA, is servant leadership. Servant leadership is a leadership style in which the leader puts the needs, and goals of others before their own. Servant leadership is an interactive relationship between leaders and other members. It is absolutely essential that leaders within their chapter listen to other members and see value in different
Servant leadership can be applied from the top of an organization to the lowest member because no one team member is more important than another. This is because each member is dependent upon the other to accomplish their job. This form of leadership provides a positive example of leadership for both junior to highest ranking members of the senior personnel, because of a single team member regardless of rank being attentive,supportive, and helpful to those members of staff below and above them. These
Authentic leadership is a reciprocal process because leaders affect members and members influence leaders. Transactional Leadership Theory. This approach emphasizes equitable exchange between the leader and the follower based on honesty and trust.
Robert Greenleaf is credited with having coined the term “servant-leadership” in his 1970 article “The Servant as Leader.” His man-centered leadership model has become extremely popular among leadership theorists (Spears, 2004). Robert K. Greenleaf’s definition of servant leadership is one which is based on teamwork and community, involving others in decision-making, while strongly based on ethical, caring behavior with an intent on enhancing the growth of people (Spears, 1996). These ideas have spearheaded a change in many organizations implementing concepts to empower their leadership to utilize these traits. Spears (1996) further elaborates on the influence of Greenleaf’s theories when he lists all of the organizations, musicians, and authors that have adopted his
The definition of Servant Leadership as defined by Robert K. Greenleaf states that this is a person who is first a servant, and then a leader. He or she starts from the bottom and works their way up the ladder. These people are often focused other people’s priorities, they often share power with all and they are helping their followers or subordinates develop and mature so they can perform at their best. Jim Lovell is a great example of a servant leader.
The basic principle of servant leadership is serving others and the community. The three principles of the servant-leadership are sharing the power, putting the needs of others first and helping people achieve their highest potential so that they may want to serve others. This creates an environment of trust, collaboration, teamwork and group improvement. Robert Greenleaf created the term, Servant Leader, and creating the idea of leading by serving with individuals and organizations. In one of his major essay’s, The Institution as Servant, Greenleaf (as cited in “What is Servant Leadership,” n.d.) expressed what was frequently called the “credo.”
The Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) has helped to suggest that Authentic Leadership leads to increased organizational citizenship and individual satisfaction (Northouse, 2016, p.218). Another measurement survey is the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) suggests that charisma and motivation have the most positive effects and that individualized consideration and intellectual stimulation are the next important factors (Northouse, 2016, pp.187-188). Both surveys were completed, along with others, to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses held in each style, results are the drivers of this philosophy; included in Gap Analysis
Running head: SERVANT LEADERSHIP ANALYSIS 1 Running head: SERVANT LEADERSHIP ANALYSIS 9 Servant Leadership Experience Analysis LDR-630 Servant Leadership Sylvia M. Bermudez February 28, 2018 Servant Leadership Experience Servant leaders understand the importance of building and supporting others and in helping nurture future servant leaders. Servant leaders “want to serve, to serve first,” (Greenleaf, 1970), they inspire and motivate followers through their actions and words and focus on the needs and desires of others, placing them over their own. The concept of servant leadership was first coined in the 1970s by Robert K. Greenleaf, in his essay, “Servant Leaders.” Greenleaf defines servant leadership, as “a philosophy and
Servant Leadership during Natural Disasters Servant leadership is a leader who displays ethical and caring behaviors. These leaders seek to enhance the growth of others while improving quality of life. The two main constructs of this leadership are ethical behavior and concern for subordinates. The characteristics embodied in this are stewardship, foresight, conceptualization, persuasion, building community, listening, empathy, awareness, commitment to growth of people and healing.
Lao-tzo describes servant leadership perfectly. “Many find it hard to accept the phenomenon of servant leadership because they do not understand how a servant can be a leader and how a leader can be a servant; that is, it seems to be an oxymoron” (Focht & Ponton, 2015, p. 44). I believe many people think a leader cannot work under other people as they are the boss, but it is much more simple than that. A leader is not successful if he or she serves the people by managing or demanding work from his or her followers. A true leader leads from the heart and does whatever it takes to inspire the teachers and teach the students.
Leadership is defined as, the action of leading a group of people or an organization. However, a leader would not be able to lead without their servants; individuals who follow the leader and support them. Servants are defined as a person who performs duties for others. Now, in society several people categorize themselves
Awareness - Being mindful of one 's surroundings, and especially being self-aware, will strengthen the servant-leader. Fostering awareness can be difficult, as one never knows what may be discovered. 5. Persuasion - While traditional leaders rely heavily upon their positional authority in making decisions, servant leaders rely on persuasion to convince others in order to build consensus within groups. This principle is noted as one of the clearest distinctions between the traditional authoritarian model and that of servant leadership.